Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After a sleepless night last night anticipating how to handle tuning possibly australia's tuffest R34 GTT (built by James @ OH Performance) things went remarkably smooth. With a smidge over 2bar we cracked 1002HP ATW (746.8rwKW) and 1046NM!!!! more than enough to kill any illusion that i would be able to keep top dog on my own dyno with my own unfinished project (twin T04Z turboed 427ci windsor 77' LTD)

Who said PFC's cant handle HP????

post-34927-1222161944_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1222161963_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1222162021_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/237291-tuned-1002hp-r34-t88gk-18cm-monster/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 374
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats just showing off now....

Wanna put up some Specs.... so everyone can drool some more.

haha nah this car is a real credit to its owner and builder not me, for a car to come in a pull a final result such as this with no dramas at all is a rare occurence. Most big builds that come in to be tuned run into dramas of one kind or another (fuel delivery, piping etc) but this car just played ball all day... a stuborn boost controller and a change from coppers to GREDDY racing pro plugs (super fine electrode and number 9 heat range) were the only issues and once sorted saw us crack the ton.

basic specs;

tall deck 2.8 liter

280 degree cams

T88GK 18cm not the 22cm which is most often used.... this is a daily driver and response was more important. (full boost was a low 6000rpm)

HKS dog box

ULTRA DLi ignition (HKS twin power equiv)

std coils

GREDDY racing pro plugs (coppers would not go past 900 consistantly)

Powerfc Djetro

Greddy plenum

ARC cooler

BLITZ 1000cc injectors

we did a few pulls into the 9k rpm range but the 18cm housing rolled off after 8200 so we limited it to 8300, no doubt with the 22cm rear housing 1300 ood hp would be a walk in the park and peak @9000-9200rpm.

Edited by URAS
this is a daily driver and response was more important. (full boost was a low 6000rpm)

HKS dog box

lol

Daily, with a dog box, and 1002hp? That brings a new meaning to the term "traffic light battle"

lol

Daily, with a dog box, and 1002hp? That brings a new meaning to the term "traffic light battle"

Apart from a worn 4th dog ring it is actually very easy to drive... the tripple plate is light but bites quick and is the only tricky part.

i have lived with dog boxes in street cars and a good one is actually (aprt fom noise) easier to drive as im lazy and am happy to slap around the town without the clutch :)

interesting....

does your dyno read lower then a Mainline ?

yeah it seems to read a bit lower than a popular mainline here in vic but on a 250rwkw car it is only about 10-15rwkw

OH dont do thier own tuning?

Nice drive from the west to the easts :)

Not sure about street car lol, that thing has a canary flagging bigger than a warship!

Great result without a doubt... although come on, SIF twin Z's wont make more

the reason i askin, is that my 515hp at wheels, pushed 1083nm... but thats from a 3 litre... i find it hard that 500cc could make that much difference?

i also noticed the power band... wow that car would be something... well.. challenging

yeah it seems to read a bit lower than a popular mainline here in vic but on a 250rwkw car it is only about 10-15rwkw
the reason i askin, is that my 515hp at wheels, pushed 1083nm... but thats from a 3 litre... i find it hard that 500cc could make that much difference?

i also noticed the power band... wow that car would be something... well.. challenging

haha sorry yeah in torque the dynapack is the only dyno to give realistic torque ie close to engine dyno readings, luckily it has both readings, i just switched it accross to mainline / dyno dynamics figures this car pulled 4299nm.... big differrence.

the only other car to come close to this torque was a 408ci blown v8 with 653rwkw and 1022NM, honestley without sounding arrogant there is no way your car made even close to 1083nm, i would expect closer to 600-650nm from your setup, which is still very respectable.

Edited by URAS
damn!

what will this be used for ? dyno days etc etc??? serious question..

well it was loaded with house tiles and driven to ocean grove.... just to put some kays on it.... daily enough?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...