Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ahhh...I know what you mean now!! About the inducer. Yes, the inducer on the 52T showed does look like it is tapered whereas yours goes straight down. But, having said that...I am sure I remember looking at mine the other time and it does fall straight down, but maybe that was on the 56T - that was on my car. I will check tonight to see if it's so and if there is a difference between the 52T and the 56T inducer. But if you hadn't said that I wouldn't have noticed. You're very observant :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2381-hks-turbo/page/5/#findComment-435622
Share on other sites

Hmm...not sure how much better the GT-RS is, but I believe it would be better being a newer designed turbo. I thought it was supposed to supercede the 2540 which was supposed to be more laggy and give only a small increase in power. I would pay the extra money and buy the GT-RS new.

Steve: I thought the GT3037S was the only "S" turbo, and as such is the only turbo to have the inducer? I know the GT2835R also has a 100mm inlet, but no inducer. The same thing goes for the GT3240. I didn't know there was another "S" turbo?

Yeah, I wonder what the rationale is behind the turbo prices.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2381-hks-turbo/page/5/#findComment-436068
Share on other sites

My 2835 ProS has a T3. I think standard 2835 have something different. HKS USA site has them all. I also have a 044 in tank. I do however have surge problems. I am informed 044's are best at pushing and not sucking. I know other people however that do not have fuel surge problems.

Steve-Do you have fuel surge problems? Mine can happen as low as half a tank. Did you fit yours yourself. Even your favoured James from D1 said 044 can have this problem sujesting to go GTR pump. Another rumour is that the filter supplied with 044 is not as pourous as standard. Everyone wants to give me a surge tank. Firstly I will pull the pump myself and check. It was fitted by a reputable mechanic.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2381-hks-turbo/page/5/#findComment-437275
Share on other sites

Well I havent been giving it much yet, because it isnt tuned to the new injectors, just correction via the power fc.

I drove it just on empty, took 57 litres to fill and no probs.

Richard (also D1) gave me a hand fitting it - got me to trace around the stock pump on a piece of cardboard to make sure the pickup (transferred from the stock pump) was in exactly the same spot.

The other major problem (according to richard) is that sometimes, because it is quite difficult, the pump doesnt get put in the tank quite to the same depth as the stock one, therefore problems when the fuel level gets down.

It took a little massaging of the locating lugs on the stock bracket, but eventually got it in place properly, so the pickup sits right on the bottom - but all seems fine so far, touch wood.

INASNT, I dont think it is a major problem if you get a turbo with a GT25 flange, just get an adaptor plate made up - costing me about $50 (from memory) to get one made (Evan-PSI Fabrication), and that is matched to the manifold and turbine housing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2381-hks-turbo/page/5/#findComment-437399
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...