Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey, does this include the price for purchasing the product.

If so you are looking at $2000 for the plug in microtech for the R33. I have one of these and it works great. If you need some advise om me. I could also rfer you to the guys that did mine. (if your in melb).

The LT-12 microtech is also cheaper but not the plug in version.

Cheers.

syndey kid, how hard are autronics to install and tune. The self learning package that is?

They are roughly the same price as a new power fc.

And you chuck away the airflow metre, which is always a good thing! Save up to $300 for the z32 one that you dont need.

have you had any experience with the autronic self learning packages on the rb25dets. Good results? Have had a rough price of around $2500 installed and tuned.

cheers

Sorry bolf, that post didn't answer your question.

Bin a while since I used an Autronic, on the BMW SuperTourer. The Motec self learn is more recent use for me and they are similar in execution. Self learning is great if you have a fast and wide lambda sensor, but they cost $2K on their own. Trying to tune using a narrow and slow lambda sensor ($300) is a waste of time. The self learn software was about $800'ish if I remember rightly, the whole M8 Pro package was around $5K, so that sounds right.

I recommend a lot of Motec self learn systems for guys with no easy access to dynos, expensive but works brilliantly. We tuned a car in 2 laps at Bathurst a couple of years ago, just drove it around. Took it back to the dyno I could barely squeeze a few horsepower out of it despite a couple of hours of trying. Damn accurate, better than many tuners I have seen.

Hope that helps

my mistake around $1700 + install/tune. which was roughly $700.

Is it true that the autronic and the nissan coils, can be a bit of a hassel? It may be an involved ecu, but that can be a good thing, giving more options, functions, and settings to control. In the right hands i think it could work well.

just need to know how compatable they are to a rb25det motor...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...