Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

I have just created a Petition thread in the facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=10...gid=32246238262

I want to put together a petition to send to the fuel companies to get in there faces about distributing this fuel more widespread keen as to get it in brissey

so yea chuck on your details and show your support :)

Cheers,

Dan

One thought on petitions... In the States (I'm from Las Vegas) they market E85 as a "Green Fuel".

It helps the environment and is renewable (and drives the food prices up because we are converting grain into ethanol instead of eating it…) so you might consider that approach.

Australia is obsessed with the environment and so called “green” things. So, instead of the “it’s good for my car” approach, try “it will help the environment and make us less dependant on foreign oil!” The government will love that! The servos can market it!

I have friends in the states that have converted their cars to E85 and they love it too!

I ran 15% E85 and 85% Premium in my STI and had great results. (Helps my GTR also!) Alway fun mixing fuels at the pump!

Edited by rapidroy

I have mentioned this before but here we go again.

There is no point doing petitions to get fuel companys to sell e85. Don't you think that if there was a way a fuel company could make more money they would be there making it?

Its not that they don't want to sell E85 its because the cost outlay to get the servo's fuel tank prepared and converted over to e85 is very expensive, it cost Rozelle $40,000 to upgrade the servo to stock E85 and the only reason why they have gone through this trouble is because they have a contract to supply E85 for CSR's company cars so they will be able to continually sell the fuel to make the money back.

Thats why all the other servo's had to stop selling E85 is because they have not had the required upgrades and you could just think about it like this, when could a independant servo be able to afford $40,000 just so they can make 1c a litre of sales from E85.. How many litres of fuel would they have to sell to make the money back before making a profit ?

a hell of alot, for the moment I think we are pretty lucky that United have offered E85 in few outlets they have so we have been able to do some testing and learn a bit out ethanol and even more so we are very lucky that they are selling it to the public as well! yes it does have a great potential but I just don't think that we will be seeing more outlets in the near future just because of this legal requirement to sell e85.

Does anyone know what happens to the E85 that stored in a non approved tank? the extra water that gets in there would be a concern has there been any tests ? do we know for sure what happens to the fuel in non converted tanks? whats the whole reason behind all this bullshit???.

I think that would be the place to start you might get more traction that way.

just something to think about.

555's

If that's 13B turbo 555's they actually flow 565 to 570 cc's at 34 psi. My standard FPR was 38 psi, so they were actually flowing 580 cc's. For the R33GTST I bumped that up to 3 bar, 44 psi, with a Nismo AFPR and they now flow more than 650 cc's plus the atomisation looks better on the flow tester. So 350 rwkw on E85 should be possible.

Cheers

Gary

If that's 13B turbo 555's they actually flow 565 to 570 cc's at 34 psi. My standard FPR was 38 psi, so they were actually flowing 580 cc's. For the R33GTST I bumped that up to 3 bar, 44 psi, with a Nismo AFPR and they now flow more than 650 cc's plus the atomisation looks better on the flow tester. So 350 rwkw on E85 should be possible.

Cheers

Gary

I ran out of injectors with Nismo 740cc at 340rwkw.

I have mentioned this before but here we go again.

There is no point doing petitions to get fuel companys to sell e85. Don't you think that if there was a way a fuel company could make more money they would be there making it?

Its not that they don't want to sell E85 its because the cost outlay to get the servo's fuel tank prepared and converted over to e85 is very expensive, it cost Rozelle $40,000 to upgrade the servo to stock E85 and the only reason why they have gone through this trouble is because they have a contract to supply E85 for CSR's company cars so they will be able to continually sell the fuel to make the money back.

Thats why all the other servo's had to stop selling E85 is because they have not had the required upgrades and you could just think about it like this, when could a independant servo be able to afford $40,000 just so they can make 1c a litre of sales from E85.. How many litres of fuel would they have to sell to make the money back before making a profit ?

a hell of alot, for the moment I think we are pretty lucky that United have offered E85 in few outlets they have so we have been able to do some testing and learn a bit out ethanol and even more so we are very lucky that they are selling it to the public as well! yes it does have a great potential but I just don't think that we will be seeing more outlets in the near future just because of this legal requirement to sell e85.

Does anyone know what happens to the E85 that stored in a non approved tank? the extra water that gets in there would be a concern has there been any tests ? do we know for sure what happens to the fuel in non converted tanks? whats the whole reason behind all this bullshit???.

I think that would be the place to start you might get more traction that way.

just something to think about.

This is very interesting. Around $40K is what it would cost these days to install a complete new underground tank of around 10,000 litres based on what I heard around the servos a few years back when 98 was introduced. Some had to have an extra tank and pumps installed so they could sell 92, 95 and 98. I can't see how it would be necessary to spend $40K to upgrade an existing tank for E85, a water filter and control valve would be a few hundered dollars and most. Recalibrating the existing pumps is a no brainer, lucky to cost $500 to do it. My thoughts are that anyone quoting $40K is talking about installing a brand new tank, not upgrading an existing one.

That's were the volume comes into play, obviously Rozelle had enough volume to justify the extra tank hence the $40K, or maybe CSR subsidised the tank. Once Holden introduces the E85 Commodore I suspect that the volume will be there for new tanks to be installed. Until then the only viable option would be for servos to convert existing tanks to E85. That means losing one other variety of fuel that they currently sell. That's still a volume question, will they sell more E85 than the current fue lthat is in that tank. Right now my guess would be no, there simply isn't the volume of E85 users.

But there is another alternative, instead of making only 1 or 2 cents per litre from the current E85 cost of 99 cents per litre, how about they charge the same as unleaded 92, that's $1.10 to $1.30 depending on the day of the week. Now that's 11 to 31 cents profit per litre, hence paying for the $40K tank with around 2,000 tank fills. I for one wouldn't mind paying 92 ron prices for 105 ron fuel. The truth is I would save the difference by not having to drive to Rozelle or Lansdown. Plus it's cheaper than buying E85 in drums which some guys do now.

Food for thought?

Cheers

Gary

yeah it is all well and good to sell e85 at 92 ron prices for the racers out there but I don't think people would pay that price in flex cars because then they could get more km's out of a tank of 92 for the same price then a tank of e85.

I believe the whole bowser needs to be replaced and the tank needs to be completly re-lined on the inside for e85 ??

I aint 100 % sure of the process but I was told that it costs 40k to convert over and seeing the amount of servo's that have had the upgrades you would think that there would be high cost involved.

I ran out of injectors with Nismo 740cc at 340rwkw.

What fuel pressure?

What boost?

What RPM?

It's a bit of a circle, as usual with cars.

Smaller injector plus higher pressure = higher flow

Until the fuel pump runs out of flow at that pressure

Then bigger injectors at lower pressure works as the pump doesn't have to work as hard against that lower pressure

That is further complicated when we add boost into the equation. Effective fuel pressure for the injectors + boost pressure = pressure that the pump must deliver.

It is possible for one car to make 340 rwkw at 1 bar, but another car might take 2.5 bar to make 340 rwkw, this effects the fuel flow.

Add to that the fact that a 340 at 1 bar engine can accommodate a wole lot more ignition timing and runs lower inlet temps, so it makes the 340 "easier" than the 340 at 2.5 bar engine.

To further complicate it, the higher rpm the 340 is developed at the smaller time the injector has to be effectively open (ie; while the inlet valve is open).

Should I mention tuning variations? Suffice to say there are still quite few arguments going on about what A/F ratios to use for the best from E85.

Keeping the above factors in mind I couldn't give an absolute yes or no, hence why "350 rwkw on E85 should be possible". Most certainly not guaranteed and very much depending on lots of factors.

Cheers

Gary

yeah it is all well and good to sell e85 at 92 ron prices for the racers out there but I don't think people would pay that price in flex cars because then they could get more km's out of a tank of 92 for the same price then a tank of e85.

The two flex cars I have tried, both SAAB's, used 25% to 30% more E85 than 92, about 20% to 25% more than 98. So the same price for 92 and E85 would work out around the same cost per K. And slightly lower cost per K than 98, both for better performance.

I believe the whole bowser needs to be replaced and the tank needs to be completly re-lined on the inside for e85 ??

About 1/3rd of all undergrounds tanks are the older, uncoated style. They have to be replaced, regardless of E85, in the next 5 years to pass EPA requirements. The later under ground tanks (the other 2/3rds) are all coated. So I don't see that E85 is a big issue for the 2/3rds and the other 1/3rd has to do it anyway. That was the situation in 2005 when the audit was carried out by AAL. Obviously it's better (more coated tanks) now.

I aint 100 % sure of the process but I was told that it costs 40k to convert over and seeing the amount of servo's that have had the upgrades you would think that there would be high cost involved.
Neither am I, but I do know that you could spend $40K on new multiple outlet, temperature and fuel density corrected, EFT enabled pumps. And they are being installed everyday in servos all over the place. If the volume is there then the money is, the trick is getting past the time of small volume, because there is no doubt that E85 will be mainstream in not too many years.

In the electronic industry we are what would be called "Early Adopters" and as such we have to pay more for the priveledge of being first with the latest. Compared to what blue ray players and their DVD's cost, paying for E85 at 92 prices is not so bad. In car speak, people pay more for a Prius than an Echo, just for the sake of being seen green, we wouldn't be paying more for being green, just the same or even less if you talk 98. That's not so terrible after all.

Cheers

Gary

Who's pulled their pump recently to checkout their sock after running E85?

E85CloggedFilter.jpg

Almost thinking its a bogus pic. :S

Damn!! thats a concern!!!

I will have to check mine when if i ever see my car again

Definitely that sock looks fairly extreme.

I've got mine apart again doing a little more work so I might as well pull the pump and check out the socks condition.

yeah you need to post up results and info etc etc

ok guys, my car is now running on E85. It's a NISTUNE remap and i don't have the cable or software yet, so yeah... can't switch if i run out of fuel in the middle of nowhere :P

Thought i'd add some thoughts on the injector talk. I've got 480cc Nismo's at the moment in the car, and stock FPR. We're running out of injectors at around 260rwkw, 15psi.

By rough calculations, 480cc = 480hp = ~350kw less 50kw drive-train loss = 300rwkw. That's what i was thinking... but yes, forgot to add that there is a 30% fuel increase with E85 :D So yah, we ran out... bugger.

To add to more good results with this fuel, i was getting 250rwkw at 17.5psi and with 2.5psi less, and not quite a flat AFR (runs pretty rich near top end, there's a little bit there if that's flattened out) we got +10rwkw, increased full boost response by about 100-200rpm and about 30nm more torque i believe. Don't have the dyno sheet, but yeah, basically the curve moved left and up, a weird looking combo, but cool none-the-less :P

getting some 740cc injectors asap. My tuner doesn't like adj FPR's, so we didn't go down that road.

That would be Paul,

His car is an animal. One of the quickest S13s in the country.

The 3076 is rated at 525hp. So it makes sense that the current power level is the highest efficient limit.

348 is at 19psi and 6800rpm.

At 23psi we might reach 360rwkw which would be really pushing the turbo. For the sake of reliability 350rwkw is plenty.

Just got an email from PJ (Paul) and he just ran 503 rwhp on the JEM dyno with 25 psi on a 3076 and 1.12 exhaust housing on E85 with 1600cc indy blue injectors.

He mentioned they did run up to 27.5 psi boost and made more power but were concerned for the intregity of the SR20 block as it wasn't sleeved.

376 rwks' has surely got to be a record out of a 3076 on any engine.....

Edited by juggernaut1

I had a short chat with the manager at Lansdowne today, he has locked the E85 pump until something is cleared up, wouldn't tell me what, why or when. So it's back to Rozelle for me.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...