Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys. not sure if this has been spoken about or not. i haev a S2 r33 97 model and if for example you put your blinker on to turn right as you come up to a roundabout and then turn the wheel to the left a little tooo far, the blinker will click off. not sure if this is meant to happen or if there is something wrong with the blinker assembly in my car? i have driven other cars before that this happens on but they were brand new so i'm assuming its meant to happen on some cars?

if it is then fair enough, but it is a bit of a pain sometimes so if skylines aren't meant to have this i'd like to know so i can fix it.

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239330-blinker-wont-stay-on/
Share on other sites

I also noticed that when getting my skyline... its bloody annoying to be honest. I think it may be a nissan thing, my mother-in-law had a maxima, and it also behaved the same way.

do you have an aftermarket boss kit and steering wheel? if so it not aligned correctly?

lol most cars do this.. there is a bush in your steering rack behind your steering wheel.. it has two protrusions that click the indicator off just in case you forget to turn it off.. you could always take it out and grind off the protrusions..

do you have an aftermarket boss kit and steering wheel? if so it not aligned correctly?

Nah, it's the standard wheel.

lol most cars do this.. there is a bush in your steering rack behind your steering wheel.. it has two protrusions that click the indicator off just in case you forget to turn it off.. you could always take it out and grind off the protrusions..

Hehe, i'll add that to the ever growing list of improvements i'd like to make to the car one-day :P

Edited by themeaton

yes but most cars blinkers will stay on when you click it the wrong way though. thats the way it is in most cars in the world. just seems that a couple cars i have driven lately do it the way my skyline does. if its the way it is standard then i guess i'll just deal with it i guess. it becomes habit after a while anyway because you expect it to happen.

nope i dissagree, most cars do what the nissan does, off the top of my head ford transit van does it, all nissans to my knowledge do it, early 90's magnas do it (not sure of the newer ones) kia rios and sportage do it, excel did it, rolls royce silver spirit did it, 300e mercedes does it..... the only car that i have noticed that doidnt do it is my gf's new astra coupe, it has some electronic thing that turns the indicator off only when the car has been going straight for a few car lengths, its annoying at first but i think its a good idea. makes you indicate like a granny (if they would decide to indicate)

but its simple enough to adjust it and put it to your specs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...