Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,

Well ITs been a LONG time since I decided I was serious about wanting an import. I couldn't do anything until I sold my first car (Subaru Liberty) so I sold that, which was about 3 months ago. I was looking at mainly R32's, R33's, S13's (although not preferable) and 180SX's, with the odd glance at Stagea's or a Toyota of some description. After MANY arguements with Dad about Turbo's he finally agreed to letting me own a 4cyl Turbo, and I found one.

Its a 1998 (according to ID Plate, 1995 according to rego???) 180SX. Its done 111,xxx km's and the only mods are the clear tail lights, 3inch cat back exhaust and coilovers. The guy gave me the stock tail lights incase I wanted to change them, but might leave it for now.

Overall its in good condition, there is a few chips that have been covered on the roof and a few small scratches, but only noticable if you're really looking. The drivers seat is slightly pushed in/squashed from getting in and out but the inteerior is in great condition also. It runs well and the gears are nice, but I wouldn't know much as it is my first.

I picked it up saturday morning and not driven manual for a good couple of weeks (been driving my sisters car around the block every now and then) I managed to stall it leaving the guys house :ermm:

But now I'm doing a lot better and a lot smoother.

Anyway I didn't tell ANY of my mates and since my two best mates were coming back from QLD that night, I ddecided to go pick them up in it, what a surprise haha!

So I've been driving it around all weekend, stupid idea was a bay run today. Insane traffic banked up. Getting used to it slowly.

Now with the year mix ups, I just got a mate to Nissan FAST it using the VIN, and it said it was made in 95/07. Why would the ID plate say 98 but the VIN from the same plate say its a 95

(which is what it is rego'd as). Very confusing, is there anything I can check to determine the year? Did they even make non type X models in 98? My original theory was they sold all the Type X bits and replaced them with standard parts, but thats obviously not right. Anyone know why it'd have 98 stamped in?

But anyway, it drives, so here's a few quick snaps from my phone over the weekend:

l_0dab85e0fd7b444a98a1c119569e29ed.jpg

l_86a19205e8744c439250ee4273f640a7.jpg

l_1d8c10e90be34222aab037f70236141f.jpg

l_c566aebe703749ae831f37b9bfef688e.jpg

l_7128cdd560194793b69e014cf28e6548.jpg

l_a5b5e0039d9d4b3ba3969e7ac8c39e95.jpg

l_83df839d324f406d95c9ff862f5d53af.jpg

I will post better pics when I take them (probably next weekend).

Thanks for looking! Tom.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239905-my-new-car/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nice buy. I would personally be looking to replace them tail lights with a set of Type X rear tail lights :) what engine is it - CA or SR?

+1

get black drifteks on that and it will look king ,

let me know if you want to see what im talkin about ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239905-my-new-car/#findComment-4190377
Share on other sites

Wow quick replys.

Its a Blacktop SR20DET, Manual.

Pete, taken straight from the ad on carpoint: 'SR20 Black Top Motor, 3 Inch Exhaust System from the CAT Back, Coil Over Suspension, LED Tail Lights (Have original Tail Lights), Car Alarm / Immobiliser, Keyless Entry, CD / Mini Disk Player, Serviced & in good condition, RAA Checked & able to view report,

Complied December 2007'

So 98 can't be compliance date.

I won't be doing any mods for a while, or atleast until I build my bank account back up! I'll probably get a new head unit and the side window visors forst, then think about a Type X wing and tail lights and maybe a rear window spoiler. Rims, well I was thinking bronze/gold XD9's? But thats a long way off yet.

Interior pics will come later. Here's the one from carpoint:

4308188.jpg

Engine:

4209066.jpg

And Mitch care to share your pics?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239905-my-new-car/#findComment-4190405
Share on other sites

Yeah, XD9's aren't that expensive though mate. Just abit over $3,000 with tires. 18x8.5 and 18x9.5 with 35 offset would sit nice on that. Bit of dish etc. You wouldn't really need a kit on it, would look tough (and different) with the stock one on. That's all you would really need to do exterior wise. Keep it clean and keep it simple.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239905-my-new-car/#findComment-4190420
Share on other sites

yeah i like white 180's pretty much all 180's cept for champagne gold :)

if you want tinted windows and a better alarm ring Ric from Auto Perfection let him know Steve from Skylines Australia told you to go there

Don't get drift-teks, everyone has them. Wait for the AUS$ to strengthen and get some good Jap rims under yourself.

+1

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239905-my-new-car/#findComment-4190421
Share on other sites

Thanks Steve, its actually got a Cyclops alarm, so its alright, will keep the tint in mind.

Unfortunately I gotta wait a while before I can spend any on it, as I did have to pay cash so my bank account is very low. Unlike most people my age, I have to pay for it myself.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239905-my-new-car/#findComment-4190431
Share on other sites

Thanks Steve, its actually got a Cyclops alarm, so its alright, will keep the tint in mind.

Unfortunately I gotta wait a while before I can spend any on it, as I did have to pay cash so my bank account is very low. Unlike most people my age, I have to pay for it myself.

Paid cash for mine when I imported it, was my first car and import, pay for all my mods cash too. You learn something new everyday about them. You've been on here long enough to know anyone here will help you when and if you need it. Just don't get yourself a girlfriend, work more, spendless and you'll have all the mods done before you know it.

How much you paying for insurance?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239905-my-new-car/#findComment-4190437
Share on other sites

Well since I'm a 17 year old male driving a turbo, comprehensive was something insane like $3k a year and I don't wanna know the excess.

So third party property, fire and theft is about $530 or something with an excess of about $1700 for an accident, and $1150 for fire and theft.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239905-my-new-car/#findComment-4190442
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...