Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^^ LOL! Yeah.

Its cool Craig, its cool!

R32 GTR N1's had a more Refined engine or Race Spec engine. So upgraded pistons, rods, crank, cams, block and turbos etc all from the Nissan factory.

ABS, A/C, sound system, rear wiper and carpets were removed and s et of light weighted head light were used, all to save weight.

Only avaliable in Crystle White paint.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241141-n1-r32/#findComment-4210870
Share on other sites

^^ LOL! Yeah.

Its cool Craig, its cool!

R32 GTR N1's had a more Refined engine or Race Spec engine. So upgraded pistons, rods, crank, cams, block and turbos etc all from the Nissan factory.

ABS, A/C, sound system, rear wiper and carpets were removed and s et of light weighted head light were used, all to save weight.

Only avaliable in Crystle White paint.

yep,

Also body received bonnet lip spoiler, boot lip spoiler and i believe side skirts

91-92 N1's had standard brakes, where as 93-94 N1's were based on V-specs so also had Brembo's.

I've been told no clear coat on paint as well. Some say to save weight, other say cause they pretty much repainted by race teams straightaway, there was no need for it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241141-n1-r32/#findComment-4211002
Share on other sites

I only asking for some help bout the 2 models. No need for that. It people like you that give SAU a bad name.

I wasn't aware that SAU had a bad name....

actually its the ricers and wingers and dump people that give SAU a bad name

I think you mean Dumb :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241141-n1-r32/#findComment-4211173
Share on other sites

I wasn't aware that SAU had a bad name....

Well if he's been called a f**king retard and he's a newbie, then straight up he's gonna think where all arrogant, rude SAU members...

yep,

Also body received bonnet lip spoiler, boot lip spoiler and i believe side skirts

91-92 N1's had standard brakes, where as 93-94 N1's were based on V-specs so also had Brembo's.

I've been told no clear coat on paint as well. Some say to save weight, other say cause they pretty much repainted by race teams straightaway, there was no need for it.

+1

Yeah no clear coat was to save weight.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241141-n1-r32/#findComment-4212429
Share on other sites

he's been on since april.. plenty of time.. it's just lazy people who cbf searching the website and just post.. as if there isnt enough GTR N1 posts already.. i was reading one not a couple of weeks ago.. so yeah i can be rude but i'm gonna be rude when they don't search

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241141-n1-r32/#findComment-4212864
Share on other sites

What? Are you kidding?

LOL!

Well if you think about it, how many litres is it to paint the clear coat of a car..?

(I don't know how many litres is used to paint a car / clear coat) but for example, if they use 6 Litres to paint a clear coat, which = an extra 6 Kilograms of weight to carry.

1 Litre = 1 Kilogram.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241141-n1-r32/#findComment-4213001
Share on other sites

LOL!

Well if you think about it, how many litres is it to paint the clear coat of a car..?

(I don't know how many litres is used to paint a car / clear coat) but for example, if they use 6 Litres to paint a clear coat, which = an extra 6 Kilograms of weight to carry.

1 Litre = 1 Kilogram.

I guess.. but that is ridiculous taking it to that length.

And FYI - litre does not always equate exactly to 1 kilogram as the density of different liquids effects its weight.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241141-n1-r32/#findComment-4213185
Share on other sites

he's been on since april.. plenty of time.. it's just lazy people who cbf searching the website and just post.. as if there isnt enough GTR N1 posts already.. i was reading one not a couple of weeks ago.. so yeah i can be rude but i'm gonna be rude when they don't search

Anger management buddy!

Dont like the post??? dont reply! quite simple really! sometimes the search tool can be overwhelming!

Take a pill... go for drive, just chill out!

New posts about the same topics can be interesting for people who were not looking for this information inparticular but stumbled upon it because it's new on the thread list!

If you know everything there is to know about N1's and you've read every post in your fancy search tool, than why are you even clickin on the link? and commenting multiple times? :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241141-n1-r32/#findComment-4218090
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
×
×
  • Create New...