Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

note- looks like rust is on the water/oil pumps and the timing belt bearings, which will be replaced with tomei/n1 items...

is it too far gone?

and are they forgies?

engine kinda fell into my lap

digits on pistons are:RA9603X 0.50

RIB 0.10 SB

Edited by r33cruiser

Those part numbers are from an ACL Race Series forged piston. They are 20thou oversize. Being an RB26, they will actually be a ROSS Piston. If you look on the under side of them straight under the gudgeon pin, you will notice the ROSS brand has been CNC machined off them.

Engine also looks to be R33 GTR or could be N1, check for markings on the block as I can't read them properly on the side from your photos.

The rust will be ok, just have it cleaned properly. Make sure you have the piston to bore clearance checked when you disassemble it to make sure it will be a good engine when you are finished

u are f**king beautiful. i LOVE U!!!!!

the dude gave it to me as a rb25, are u 100% sure its a rb26 ??!?!!?

in that case, i will look out for an rb30 head :P

Edited by r33cruiser
u are f**king beautiful. i LOVE U!!!!!

the dude gave it to me as a rb25, are u 100% sure its a rb26 ??!?!!?

in that case, i will look out for an rb30 head :P

Sure looks like an RB25 block to me, no provision for rear turbo drain, different head gasket pattern. Not familiar enough with an RB30 to say if the block could be that. At .50 mm oversize and with rusty bores you should still be able to rebore it and be safe. The block needs a deck skim, too, to clean the head face surface up.

Sure looks like an RB25 block to me, no provision for rear turbo drain, different head gasket pattern. Not familiar enough with an RB30 to say if the block could be that. At .50 mm oversize and with rusty bores you should still be able to rebore it and be safe. The block needs a deck skim, too, to clean the head face surface up.

edited...see below

Sure looks like an RB25 block to me, no provision for rear turbo drain, different head gasket pattern. Not familiar enough with an RB30 to say if the block could be that. At .50 mm oversize and with rusty bores you should still be able to rebore it and be safe. The block needs a deck skim, too, to clean the head face surface up.

You are actually correct Chris. It is an RB25. I just looked up the part number on the ACL website. The part number of the piston is RB25DET but the block has the provision for the alloy sump with front diff so I'd say it's out of a GTS4. Sorry to get you xcited Cruiser :P

why put an RB30 head on it? they are SOHC. it will be a 2.5litre SOHC nugget.

to me it looks fairly fked. look at the rust on the timing belt gear and how corroded the oil pump is. I'm sure you can save it but it will take some work and money. in the end you probably wont save a lot over just rebuilding a better health RB25 to start with and you may end up spending just as much for an engine that has second hand gear in it. considering it's been outside with no sump on it for a fair while expect the crank to be rusted up nicely too. also check the pistons well, at least one has a nice little chip out of it that will make a hotspot. it's good for free, but just a shame it wasn't looked after. see if you can find out why it was pulled from a car and dissasembled in the first place. it's not normal for people to pull out a perfectly good motor for no reason.

in that case, i will look out for an rb30 head :)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

PS that engine needs full strip, hot tank, deck and most likely all the internals will need hot tanking and so forth (new rings, prolly rusted). Its a fair clunker but if you got it cheap and the rings are cheap good find.

Edited by URAS

lol cheers dano... nfi why i said rb30 head :|.

yea consulted my mechanic.

of course its going to be stripped, chemically bathed, inspected, machined, honed etc etc. he 100% assures me it will be perfect. and he has his work to back that up

your are stupid for even thinking about NOT doing that!!

URAS mate, it was free, u believe that :(:D :D. so saves me about 2-3g's easy

thanks for all your help.

closer inspection of code: 08U, makes it a 25.

thanks again

Edited by r33cruiser

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...