Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

im in the market to get new wheels

currently using stock ones and massive gaps from the wheel to the guard

ive seem some of the jdm pics and i really like those aggressive lookin wheels

prob looking at te37 replicas

but the offset thing is a lil confusing to me, what would make it look phat and stick out of the guard a lil bit

without being too obviously illegal and get defected.

also are the offsets different for different wheels??

im after sizes like this

IMG_0048.jpg

post-139958-1223595402656599381.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/242320-a-good-offset-to-fit-32-gtst/
Share on other sites

te37 replicas would not come with any sizes/offsets to give you the look you are after.

are you plannin on working on your guards? eg. pump/flare? or just a roll with the guards.

what size are you after? 17s?18s? also widths?

im after 17'' matte / black rims

um theres these te37 replicas for lik $800

apparently their offsets are +35 - 40

so thats small?? caz im not really sure with the whole offsets thing.

5x114.3 ? was thinkin of running em with spacers or something?

width im not sure. thats y i had to ask

wat usually gives the best look? size and width wise?

im not really the smartest guy wen it comes to wheel measurements.

and guards ill prob leave for now. lol

hey subie nice rims mate

but sry not the style im looking for tho

Edited by cake69

First picture of the R32 is my old car, those rims have huge offset and are a tight fit for standard R32 guards

Fronts are 17 x 9.5 + 17

Rears are 18 x 10 + 18

Stretched tyres to make them tuck under the guards

Fronts are 215/40/R17

Rears are 235/40/R18

You still need to roll and slightly 'pump' the guards to get them to tuck under, the way it sits though, in Victoria you would get raped as they are protruding out of the guards

First picture of the R32 is my old car, those rims have huge offset and are a tight fit for standard R32 guards

Fronts are 17 x 9.5 + 17

Rears are 18 x 10 + 18

Stretched tyres to make them tuck under the guards

Fronts are 215/40/R17

Rears are 235/40/R18

You still need to roll and slightly 'pump' the guards to get them to tuck under, the way it sits though, in Victoria you would get raped as they are protruding out of the guards

wow u had a very nice 32 with massive dish wheels

i love em

and thx rekin for the advice.

so i should be looking at 17x9 with about +30 offset not looking at any major work on the guards to fill em out?

btw do u no if driftek's have the sizes that i want?

edit: also do i want the front and rear tyres to be same size? width and size wise??

im learning so much :D lol thx fellas

Edited by cake69
also wat do u guys mean rolling the guards?

or 'pump' the guards? i no what flaring is but these ive rarely heard

guard liners? :P lol

take a look under your rear guards on your car.

There will be a thin peice of metal.

Rolling involves flattening that peice of metal to provide more clearance for your rims.

Guard liners are the plastic liners found in your front guards.

you mean like this?

post-24032-1225352141_thumb.jpg

Nah, you don't want something like that. That's Mexican spec. hahaha :sick: Maybe a little camber and it'll look better.

Look under your guards, if it's standard, it'll look something like this,

image040ln9.jpg

image051jg4.jpg

Those guards 'rolled' will look like this,

image038ou7.jpg

image054ym0.jpg

Anything really 'tough' looking is illegal these days. My rear wheels slightly stick out of the guards, not even that tough and they still got me pulled up. This is in a shit bomb of a car too. Just don't let the police see your car from behind and it should be okay... :laugh:

Edited by adam-__-

doesnt take much to roll your gaurds, panel beater, wheel shop. good luck on your choice, driftek should come with the right sizes aswell.

a quick question, not trying to hi-jack just noticed somthing, if you flare your gaurds so as the rim doesnt actually sit out of them is it still illegal due to it being wider than standard?

Gezza

a quick question, not trying to hi-jack just noticed somthing, if you flare your gaurds so as the rim doesnt actually sit out of them is it still illegal due to it being wider than standard?

Gezza

Yeah, most likely will still be illegal. In Victoria, you can only increase your track by ~26mm. For the wheels to come out of the guards in the first place, they would have to exceed that limit. Most cops won't know that anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...