Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i always read that on power fc's that you read the knock of the engine...now do i need to buy an extra sensor to be able to see the knock reading or is it standardly(if thats a word) built into the engine r34gtt neo.

so just plug in the power fc and it reads the knock right away.

or

do i need an extra (item)(upgrade) to be able to see the knock reading???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/243491-knock-sensoris-it-standard-built-in/
Share on other sites

The knock sensors were put there by nissan, you just never had anything displaying what they say before

not in the slightest bit accurate.

if its a high number, you can almost sasume your knocking, but not necessarily.

if its low however you can probably assume you arent

lol @ not the slightest bit accurate

What a load of crap. If the sensor is dead or faulty... fair enough, but... then its not working correctly now is it?

Knock between 20-35 is acceptable for a good tune from a PFC.

40-100 your tune really needs attention... over 100 its just plain crap :P

Sometimes if you hit the limiter it will smash over 100 etc. As the knock sensors do at times pickup other noises as "knock" but this is not common.

lol @ not the slightest bit accurate

What a load of crap. If the sensor is dead or faulty... fair enough, but... then its not working correctly now is it?

Knock between 20-35 is acceptable for a good tune from a PFC.

40-100 your tune really needs attention... over 100 its just plain crap :P

Sometimes if you hit the limiter it will smash over 100 etc. As the knock sensors do at times pickup other noises as "knock" but this is not common.

I'm really interested in the use of the standard knock sensor. I have an SITC and a SAFC and want to tune my own engine. I got an LM2 to do the afrs but have been looking for a knock detection device. Guilt Toy suggests that you need a K-Mon device at about $1200 to do the job but are you suggesting that if i can get something to read from the standard knock sensors that i can use that reading to adjust timing across the rev range?

Adriano, any idea on the ecu address for monitoring knock readings? In particular a 32gtst ecu.. I'm running remapped stock ecu and have a carpc with Datascan running all the time so would be nice to get a knock readout :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...