Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , I went to plug the new Datalogit kit int my PFC and find that it wont plug in . The male plugs on the extension cable and the black box have plastic guide pegs that are too long/wide to fit in the PFC boxes socket .

The Apexi Commander's plug fits fine and when compared the difference is very obvious .

Surely to christ I'm not expected to break the plastic pegs out of these male plugs to get them to fit the PFC's socket ?

I have a home made extension cable made from a 6 pin din plug that's had the 6th pin and the plastic peg removed and yes I made sure it haden't lost any pins in the PFC's socket .

Does everyone attack these male plugs or is it just mine that have a problem .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/243743-prob-with-datalogit-kit/
Share on other sites

Upon closer inspection the supplied datalogit plugs seem to have the plastic pegs in the wrong place , they look like generic 6 pin din plugs but with only 5 pins .

The PFC unit and the Apexi Commander must have a slightly different version of a "Din Plug" system because their plugs have the plastic peg offset downwards towards the dimple that lines up with the small square hole at the base of the socket .

BINGO - just sussed it out !

Whilst glancing at my old dinosaur laptop I spied a "Din" socket on the back of it . Methinks I wonder if the Datalogit plug or the supplied extension cable fits in there - which of course they didn't ...

Then brain drops into gear and remembers that computers don't use Din sockets - they use PS2 sockets .

I just happened to have an old PS2/USB adapter plug within reach and gess what , it fits the lap tops port and looks just like the Apexi Commanders plug - only 6 pins instead of 5 .

The burning question seems to be why would FC Datalogit supply the gear with Din plugs when the Power FC's socket and the Commanders male plug are PS2 plugs - minus one pine ie 5 ?

I really hope someone thats been around these Apexi Power FC's , like Paul33 , can shed some light on this issue .

Lastly one for the computer hardware nuts , is there such a thing as a 6 pin Din/PS2 adapter plug available because that would adapt me from PS2 to Din and solve the problem .

I should NOT have to break the plastic lugs from the Datalogit plugs to make them work , they should be the correct type .

The silence is deffening , cheers Adrian .

http://www.accesscomms.com.au/reference/ou...lugsminidin.htm

PS Have a look at plugs C and D - note the lug in the middle of the plug diagrams . This is why the "5 Pin mini DIN" wont fit in a "6 pin mini DIN socket even without the 6th pin .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini-DIN_connector

5 pin and 6 pin . The size and the offset of the "middle" peg .

Edited by discopotato03
  • 2 weeks later...

well, i can help with my solution. my datalogit fitted the pfc tight but OK, but the ps2 cable I used to extend it required a small cutting of the middle peg.

it is important that the fittings are very tight.....a loose cable will cause intermittent loss of power in the ecu even though it is only running a hand controller or datalogit

I'm not sure if I posted this but I did eventually get the supplied extension cord to fit under duress into my PFC's socket .

I hate to admit I guttsed it but with a few prayers it did go in - it's just a whole lot tighter than it should be .

The risk here is pushing the plug so hard that the socket in the PFC could break its mount and fall inside the box .

I think the the bastards at Apexi don't use an industry standard 5 pin mini DIN socket , their rectangular hole for the plastic guide peg is smaller than a std 5 pin mini DINs peg .

They possibly realised that 5 and 6 pin mini DIN plugs and sockets are very similar , all thats different is the 6th pin and the plastic guide peg/hole .

Apexi's is basically a std 5 pin with a "custom" smaller guide peg hole to suit the commanders plug - which has a real skinny non standard plastic guide pin .

Anyway the extension cord lives in the car and runs behind the carpet and under the edge of the console out of sight so that the black box and laptop can easily reach from the co pilots seat .

I now need to nut out the software and interface the Tech Edge WB02 and start tuning .

Going to be different working with MAF rather than MAP like the old Haltech and Autronic computers I had used .

Cheers A .

PS Also now in the Yahoo users group and have posted asking why some MAF Toyotas have a "base " AFR fuel table as well as the usual fueling table . Why doesn't the Nissan FC Logit software have this feature ?

Edited by discopotato03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...