Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'd say that depends on who you talk to....

I believe mine runs heaps better with the pod, even before boost increase.

I'm no mechanic so someone will contradict me for sure, lol.

I think on stock it is noticable but depending on mods some say it is less needed, just a good flowing panel filter in the box is best.

if you have FMIC and can make a CAI and a box to cover the pod, may be best option.

also depends on how much flow the particular filter has.

As i said i read through threads in forced induction, they simply compare filters.

My question is different if you take another look...

I just want to know what would be better for a stock R33 GTS-T. A Pod Filter or a Pannel Filter

As i said i read through threads in forced induction, they simply compare filters.

My question is different if you take another look...

I just want to know what would be better for a stock R33 GTS-T. A Pod Filter or a Pannel Filter

Your lucky R31Nismoid has not closed your thread, as there have been a few threads about this and Ash is a true believer in the stock air box FTW.

Your gonna get mixed answers here, cuz its personal preferance and experiance.

I have to HKS pods as it came with the car and they are doing fine.

I would say stock air box or upgraded high flow panel filters are good for about 300 to 400 kWs.

Pods are very good for high end tuned performance cars. As for stock, it does not make much of a difference, pod or panel filter.

Ask Johnny, he did a test on his R34 GTR with an APexi panel filter then twin APexi pod filters and he had quite a gain in kW's.

I now have a pod on my GTST and as for performance i did notice the responsivness was better but not enough difference to notice anything significant, not running any serious mods so may be a lot different for people that are. One thing I did notice for sure is the induction noise, bit louder with the pod on but that could depend on the brand you get as well?

I now have a pod on my GTST and as for performance i did notice the responsivness was better but not enough difference to notice anything significant, not running any serious mods so may be a lot different for people that are. One thing I did notice for sure is the induction noise, bit louder with the pod on but that could depend on the brand you get as well?

Did you have a decent hi-flow panel filter in there before?

My guess is stock nissan or similar, so of course your going to notice a minor difference going from crap to a decent flowing filter setup.

If stock airboxes can make 400rwkw on BIG GTR's (with the side airbox restrictor thingo removed for the flow in R34's)

Good enough for run of the mill setups below that, plenty of threads on it, Dezz even posted some dyno results which showed such little difference it wasnt worth going pods due to factoring in increased intake temps

ok here is the thread.

This is about airbox with lid on/off

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ai...html&hl=pod

And read the whole thread, interesting points come up over the course of it, and ideas etc

... just get a high flow panel filter like r31nismoid said.

I have a Trust Airinx-GT panel filter in my Stag, is that considered rubbish or should i get a better one? Like Pipercross or something else? Any recommendations? < $100. Or are they all much of a muchness.

Edited by webng

There is no distinct answer, there are so many factors that can influence the results. Mainly if you standard airbox/filter set-up isn't a restriction than you'll see little to no power/response change.

However lets not kid ourselves must people swap to a pod set-up for the induction noise, any upgrade in performance comes as a bonus. :P

I have a Trust Airinx-GT panel filter in my Stag, is that considered rubbish or should i get a better one? Like Pipercross or something else? Any recommendations? < $100. Or are they all much of a muchness.

id go Jap stuff, but thats just me. Pipercross doesnt have panel filters for Skylines

just clean your current one

i am still running my airbox with a k&n (fmic, pfc, avcr, exhaust) and at my last dyno session it was causing a restriction. it seems the issue is with the mouth of the airbox. so if you don't plan on modifying your car, the stock airbox is ok after that though you might need a pod or modify your airbox.

Well from reading it looks like the best option for a stock car is just a hi flow panel filter.

Summer coming up and all will mean higher intake temps unless you get a partition which will set you back another $100 and from what people have said it will make very very little difference if any.

So hi-flow pannel filter

-Cheaper

-Defect free

-Lower intake temps on hot days

Pod Filter

-Intake noise

-Better for highly modified cars

This brings me to my next question on Hi-Flow Pannel Filters..

What kinds are there?

What is the best one(s)?

Thanks guys!

I personally wouldn't recommend using a oiled filter with a hot wire air mass meter set-up. The filament is extremely sensitive and it's common for excess oil to bake onto it and render the units useless.

K&N filters are unfortunately an oiled set-up, most Japanese brands are note.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...