Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes, if you've got easy access to the injectors its worth getting them cleaned and flowed. Mine were blocked even though it hadn't manifested in pinging or rough idle yet. I haven't driven my car yet so I can't comment on the difference, but I remember on SDU people were raving about smoother throttle control, smoother running and better fuel economy after cleaning injectors.

I can highly reconmend EFIS in East Vic Park (as referred to me by Steve-SST). Don't know how much they charge to clean injectors but they were reasonable in fixing up a stuff up another injector place made with my injectors.

I have a bunch of 25% off vouchers for EFIS that you are welcome to. Don't know if they're still valid though.

What did united mean by "leak in the middle"? The middle injectors in the fuel rail leaking? Or some fault in the centre of a injector making it leak? EFIS pressure tested my rail once the injectors were back in and none of them leaked.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24625-injectors/#findComment-524757
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Gradenko

Yes, if you've got easy access to the injectors its worth getting them cleaned and flowed. Mine were blocked even though it hadn't manifested in pinging or rough idle yet. I haven't driven my car yet so I can't comment on the difference, but I remember on SDU people were raving about smoother throttle control, smoother running and better fuel economy after cleaning injectors.  

I can highly reconmend EFIS in East Vic Park (as referred to me by Steve-SST). Don't know how much they charge to clean injectors but they were reasonable in fixing up a stuff up another injector place made with my injectors.

I have a bunch of 25% off vouchers for EFIS that you are welcome to. Don't know if they're still valid though.

What did united mean by "leak in the middle"? The middle injectors in the fuel rail leaking? Or some fault in the centre of a injector making it leak? EFIS pressure tested my rail once the injectors were back in and none of them leaked.

I havent really got easy access to the injectors still have the stock plenum in the way. I was just thinking it'd be worth pulling them out, cleaning them and checking the flow before I start leaning on the engine with the ecu tune. I think I might try these people, how/when can I get one of those vouchers off you gradenko?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24625-injectors/#findComment-525464
Share on other sites

rob77, I'd be hesitant to remove the plenum just to get to the injectors. Pulling the plenum is an absolute PITA, so only do it if you have to. Unbelievably the gasket between the upper and lower plenum in $85 from Nissan.

I think rev210 has removed injectors with the plenum still on, so give that a go and pm him if you get stuck. ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24625-injectors/#findComment-525612
Share on other sites

R32-GTS, maybe the rb20 plenum has bolts in different locations, but theres no way you're going to pull a rb25det plenum in 20 minutes.

Just buy a new manifold gasket from nissan that costs 10 bucks.

?? Have you priced these for the rb25det? They're not $10.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24625-injectors/#findComment-526016
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...