Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

2niunpk.jpg

ok lets look at overall average power to see whats quicker from a to b

the gt35 has approx 15hp more between 3200 and 4200

while the t04z has approx 50hp more between 4500 to 8000

i dont know about you but if ur punting a rb26 you will spend 90% of your time on full throttle above 4500rpm

T04Z wins :)

Are you seriously still pedalling that dyno plot ??

How many times do people need to be told the mid range for the 35r is off due to the boost control? I havent even mentioned the 10.8-10.9 air fuel ratio's yet. Or the fact we didnt spend any time adjusting cams thanks to the rubber delaminating when it was originally tuned.

How about we start comparing apples with apples.

Rezlo, considering you were making only 340rwkw with your 35r I might suggest it wasnt setup particularly well and isnt a good comparison. Perhaps post more details so your not misleading people.

I've come from a poorly setup gt35r which was boring as bat shit (xr6 3540) to my current setup and the difference is chalk and cheese.

archieS had a t04z - next time i see/talk to him ill get him to get the graph and post it if he does

was a stock enough 2.6ltr with just a t04z on the side to add to this.

Rezlo, considering you were making only 340rwkw with your 35r I might suggest it wasnt setup particularly well and isnt a good comparison. Perhaps post more details so your not misleading people.

I've come from a poorly setup gt35r which was boring as bat shit (xr6 3540) to my current setup and the difference is chalk and cheese.

I was making 340rwkw with the 35r? maybe if your going to dig up old posts you want to actualy check thats what I did with the GT30 on the stock 25 with an 11.6 1/4 mile to boot... that was the last time i had my car on a dyno.

My 35R setup was put onto a built motor and almost identical design manifold to when i upgraded to the T04z (my T04z is twin scroll)and it didnt have a 100mm DP and 1000cc injectors... thats about it... RB25 + T04z with @ 2 bar by 4300rpm... I can not see how you say that is misleading anyone.

Again, maybe its just me but im pretty sure when people actualy drive their cars fast they dont keep it under 4500rpm? or maybe you guys race like F&F where half way into the race you change down a gear and put your foot down?

Someone get me the dyno graphs of a T04Z running 20+psi on a 2.6L with no headwork, and 35R running 20+psi on a 2.6L with no headwork.

Its not as easy as you think, hence why I used Nik's and Cerbera's graphs, closest compo I could find, but still FAR from perfect.

I was making 340rwkw with the 35r? maybe if your going to dig up old posts you want to actualy check thats what I did with the GT30 on the stock 25 with an 11.6 1/4 mile to boot... that was the last time i had my car on a dyno.

My 35R setup was put onto a built motor and almost identical design manifold to when i upgraded to the T04z (my T04z is twin scroll)and it didnt have a 100mm DP and 1000cc injectors... thats about it... RB25 + T04z with @ 2 bar by 4300rpm... I can not see how you say that is misleading anyone.

Again, maybe its just me but im pretty sure when people actualy drive their cars fast they dont keep it under 4500rpm? or maybe you guys race like F&F where half way into the race you change down a gear and put your foot down?

sorry, was meant to quote t04gtr's post further down the page - not yours

sorry, was meant to quote t04gtr's post further down the page - not yours

No problem :cool:

By the way, before you all think im a GT35R hater,, im actualy not, I fit them to most the SR20's I build,,, hell a GT35R on a built SR20 is one whole shit load of fun!!! somthing about that 4potter at 1.7 1.8bar makes me smile...

387rwkw on 21psi. It was damn quick but i understand why Archie changed it after going for a spin

now that's the sort of graph that makes me want to consider a T04Z... lol ! 21psi ! :cool:

sorry, was meant to quote t04gtr's post further down the page - not yours

Anna's GT35R (assuming that is the GT35R Dave is talking about) has a .63 rear i wouldn't expect it to make much more than the 345 it did make.

Hmmm the general consensus seams to be pro-T04z :P

For those of you who may not know - I'm deciding between a:

GT3076r (probably the best size but limited for the amount of money spent)

GT3582r (the next best size, but descibed as "boring" by more than one person. Loses too many RPM at gearshifts etc....etc)

....and the mighty T04z (possibly too big for my hp goal but described as fun and exciting lol)

For a maximum horsepower goal of around 450-500 at the treads. That maximum figure will be reached later on down the track as I don't have the biggest budget so for the time being it will probably be no more than 400 or so. For my power goal the GT35r seams to be ideal however everyone (including my tuner) describes it as "boring".

Decisions decisions :cool:

HELP!!!

Edited by tommis85
387rwkw on 21psi. It was damn quick but i understand why Archie changed it after going for a spin

Hey where did u get my graph from mister??

Anyway yeah it was a whole lot of fun with that power but not suited to my application which was circuit.

As i have said in a previous post in this thread, u can't race a dyno graph and it's all about average power for circuit.

wrxkilla, i'd stick with the 35 if i was you :cool:

One vote for GT35 :P

Good idea - start a poll for GT3076R, GT3582R and T04Z :)

A .63a/r GT3582R will choke it a bit, I'd go a .82a/r on an RB26. I can understand why people would call the GT3582Rs "boring" as they are very competant about their power delivery, they don't "snap" onto boost - more NA in their power delivery instead of snapping onto full boost. I'd personally call a GT3076R a bit on the small side for a GTR.

Yeh a pole wouldn't be bad but you'd probably want to start a new thread for that. Yeh Lithium, I wasn't even concidering anything smaller than the 0.82A/R for the GT3582R. Queensland Raceway has a very nice straight and it would be a pitty if the car was a bit choked.

gt3076r gets my vote for what you want!!!

been in many a car with gt3582r, including sr's, rb25's, rb26's and 2jz's....

none have impressed me much at all, but someone told me nick was taking me for a lap at motorvation this weekend to prove me wrong :D

I'm still astounded by the lack of love of the GT35Rs on here, I wonder what the story is - for AGES (and with good reason) they have been one of those turbos which is an "easy bet". They are for everyone else in the world a turbo which isn't excessively laggy, very responsive and can make a good amount of power. I've been in and/or drive cars with 1.8litre, 2litre, 2.5, 2.6 and 3litre engines of different sorts running them at anywhere from 270kw to 450kw (yes, 450kw @ wheels- 9second street car stuff in the right setup) and the only ones who said they'd have gone for something different were people who were after 300kw @ wheels tops and were told to get them by people who aren't that clued up on turbos but have in 90% of cases been correct about the choice as they have worked so well on so many other cars...

There is a few Skylines running low 10s in Oz on GT35Rs, and at least one car I know of off the top of my head running 9s over there (and quite a few 9 and 10s cars over here running them) - how many 9 and 10s cars running T04Zs are there? Given they have been around for a while now, if they were that much better they'd be sticking out in the drag results threads etc around the place? All the EVO guys use them on their track cars over here, thats on little 2litre motors and often on tight tracks - hell I have been in a factory displacement EVO street car the owner uses for sealed sprints/hill climbs and that runs a .82a/r GT35R on pump gas. If he can get sufficient response out of it on his 2litre to beat out dedicated race cars etc etc (there have been GTRs running low mount twins etc at some of these events) - I don't know what you guys are doing with your 2.5 to 3litre engines to make them boring and unresponsive.

Edited by Lithium

Running a 9 with a 0.86 GT35R in a 1500+kg car (GTR) ?

I've bought a GT35R, but even I find that pretty hard to believe.

I would have thought a high-10 was a stretch in a street GTR.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...