Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Maybe someone can clear a couple of things up for me..

Ive read when tuning the fuel maps with the PFC that the O2 feedback should be turned off. ok, but should it be turned back on after tuning is finished ?

Also, the o2 feedback loop, is it more economical to run with it on or off ?

:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/
Share on other sites

i find with mine turned on it used to retart the ignition when u booted it and back teh fuel out

the tune on the car was farcked anyway what i have to loose i guess

turned it off again

and it would rev beter

not trying to lean it out etc

my engin prefers t run a little rich

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/#findComment-4286129
Share on other sites

typically on when driving normally

it should be off when wideband tuning your car

in most scenarios you will get good economy with it on and a basic tune

if you have an aggressive tune and the tuner has spent lots of time on light cruise with a wideband sensor

you can get better economy with the 02 feedback off - you can also adjust the 02 feedback co-efficient

so its not just a fixed "stuck at 14.7" setting if that makes sense

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/#findComment-4286149
Share on other sites

Ok, so when its on, are the maps setup on the pfc ignored?

Reason i ask, when on monitor, i dont see the ign timing that the map is set to for that specific rpm. ie the map is set to 28' ign for idle yet under monitor the timing is 15' ... this is with feedback on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/#findComment-4288525
Share on other sites

Ok, so when its on, are the maps setup on the pfc ignored?

Reason i ask, when on monitor, i dont see the ign timing that the map is set to for that specific rpm. ie the map is set to 28' ign for idle yet under monitor the timing is 15' ... this is with feedback on.

Closed Loop running doesn't affect the ignition timing, only the fuel delivery. You should notice the fuel ms varying (at cruise only!).

Closed Loop attempts to run the engine at 14.7 AFR by continually reading the O2 sensor output and adjusting the fuel delivery. Because it is reactive, rather than predictive, it continually overshoots 14.7, so the AFR actually cycles between "> 14.7" and "< 14.7" AFR.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/#findComment-4288627
Share on other sites

For the government emissions test they have a low idle and a hight idle test (high idle being they hold the engine to approx 2750rpm).

My car is failing on high idle on carbon monoxide, whether feedback is on or off.

Anyone know if i took fuel out of the cells around that point will it bring the CO down?

Or do I have to put the cat back in (de-cat pipe fitted), in order to pass this damn test? :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/#findComment-4294155
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...