Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi was wondering if anyone has any experience with this...

in order to get a nice intake happening, i have moved the z32 afm into the cooler piping. car seems to run fine, but what i was wondering is if i can run boost through this plastic thing?

ie will it still give reliable ratios under boost or will it wander around as the temps change?

and will it melt or crack with 280kw or so of air?

I eagerly await your opinions :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/247870-afm-in-cooler-piping/
Share on other sites

im also keen to know more about this.

I know of one bloke with 410ish rwhp on a rb25 with a z32 inside the cooler piping, he hasnt reported bad things yet though. My understanding is that if you just put it in the piping without getting it tuned to suit you'll have problems.

My brother just put a z32 on the hotside of the piping in his r33 with a gt3076r, should be on the dyno in 2 weeks so i'll let you know how it goes. Definately cleans up the engine bay, and you can have a nice 4inch s/s intake that looks very neat.

There are a few problems that i see. It is quite common in Japan, but the big drama is it gets fouled up rather quickly. Thankfully airflow does not stall through the element because it retains most of its velocity, but oil deposits from the oil intake, be it from breather recirc etc etc means tis best to keep it as close to the air filter as possible as there is less likely to be contamination and therefore get more accurate readings

nothing in front of mine but compressor wheels and pods, no recirc BOV's or oily air inputs.

only issue was the idle unit, had to plumb that in after the afm obviously whereas before it was just behind the air filter,

funny the stock position would have worked fine lol.

runs very similar to before, but it hit around 80 on the fc knock reading tonight wheras before it would not do that. Was almost full throttle, around 1.3 bar... it was only the once though so may have been something else. but yeah idles and drives same as before. Outside that one incident max knock was about 40 while backing off which is normal for my car, so I'm happy.

i think the verdict is everything is ok. i will get it on a dyno and see how it reacts to real heat though... i'm not worried about it holding pressure or measuring boosted air, but i am still worried about it sort of melting

Well the afm measures the mass amount of air flowing through, so it shouldn't matter what temp or pressure you are running. The only issues would be how it physically holds up against the increased temps/pressure (ie it could leak or temps may cause premature failure of the circuitry inside the AFM. That and oily air as mentioned.

If you want to clean up the intake get yourself a MAP and inlet temp sensors.

Well the afm measures the mass amount of air flowing through, so it shouldn't matter what temp or pressure you are running. The only issues would be how it physically holds up against the increased temps/pressure (ie it could leak or temps may cause premature failure of the circuitry inside the AFM. That and oily air as mentioned.

If you want to clean up the intake get yourself a MAP and inlet temp sensors.

Most of the people doing this will be r33 owners with power fc's since there is no djetro version to run a map sensor. You can use the gtr djetro but then you need another unit to control vct etc.

The main thing im worried about is it popping off, being plastic you cant really wrentch the crap out of them with t-clamps since they'll break. Oh well, i'll wait till my bros gets done :D

Most of the people doing this will be r33 owners with power fc's since there is no djetro version to run a map sensor. You can use the gtr djetro but then you need another unit to control vct etc.

to be honest those chasing a dejtro have probably changed turbo and the vct is of little consequence wityh a bit of tweaking.

that said i do a few AFM to pipe conversions, but usually cut the afm out of the housing as it tends to explode over 18psi :P there is a few people making alloy housings but they are overpriced.

i was running 20psi through my vh41... but it would get weird readings where sumtimes i put it down to it was located just after a bend and maby the air was buffeting around the corner and not flowing past smoothly. plus i had to remove the lil screen inside it due to it was a massive restriction.

to be honest those chasing a dejtro have probably changed turbo and the vct is of little consequence wityh a bit of tweaking.

that said i do a few AFM to pipe conversions, but usually cut the afm out of the housing as it tends to explode over 18psi :D there is a few people making alloy housings but they are overpriced.

if vct is there it might as well be used, especailly for people like my bro that only want a mild setup.

I didnt know that they would break under big boost, might have a look into that. I know a few boat builders so i might get one of those alloy afm's made up, looks very trick :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...