Jump to content
SAU Community

Australian Man Granted Patent For "circular Transportation Facilitation Device" Aka "the Wheel"

TheTunersGroup
 Share

Recommended Posts

TheTunersGroup Proficient

TheTunersGroup

Posted
Posted

Hi all,

I was sent this by a lawyer I know. Super funny and the government actually granted the guy this patent for a "circular transportation facilitation device" icon_mrgreen.gif ROFLMAO !

The drawings and description of the "invention" in his patent application are side-splittingly funny. Check out the diagram on page 4 of his patent application LMAO !!

LOL !!

- Adam

sh@un Grand Master

sh@un

Posted
Posted

imagine the royalty payments from the manufacturers of cars, trucks, buses, trains, wheel-barrows, rollerskates, etc, etc...

LOL!

TheTunersGroup Proficient

TheTunersGroup

Posted
  • Author
Posted
imagine the royalty payments from the manufacturers of cars, trucks, buses, trains, wheel-barrows, rollerskates, etc, etc...

LOL!

This bit really cracked me up ...

"he has no plan to patent fire, crop rotation or other fundamental advances in civilization".

LMAO !!!

- Adam

saliya Rising Star

saliya

Posted
Posted (edited)
Hi all,

I was sent this by a lawyer I know. Super funny and the government actually granted the guy this patent for a "circular transportation facilitation device" icon_mrgreen.gif ROFLMAO !

I'm really not sure what the big deal is. Mr Keogh's argument seems to be with the title of the granted object ('patent' rather than 'something else').

If you read the first page of the document describing the granted Innovation patent, you see two important things:

1) They are granted without examination (i.e. the substance of a patent request is unchecked, for example to see whether someone is attempting to patent the wheel).

2) After being granted, examination must occur before the owner can commerce (sic), or threaten to commence legal proceedings.

http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/patents/what_innovation.shtml says basically the same thing - that you satisfy the formalities, and the Innovation patent is granted.

But, "An innovation patent is only legally enforceable and certified if it has been examined by IP Australia and has met the requirements of the Patents Act."

So yeah, according to that you, I, or anybody else could also register an Innovation patent of the wheel as well (after all, they aren't examined before granting).

But for either Mr Keogh or anyone else to enforce any rights regarding the granted Innovation patent, it would need to be examined... and then they'd have 6 months

to overcome the objections of the examiner (unlikely :P) after which the patent ceases.

Regards,

Saliya

Edited by saliya
scathing Grand Master

scathing

Posted
Posted
someone must have been asleep at the office to let this pass..ha. good on him. doesnt it cost money to patent stuff? Is he gonna use it to scam the system like they do with trademarks?

Aside from the issues below where it has to be examined, even if it were to pass it wouldn't matter. "Prior art" is what people use to get around stupid patents like this in a practical sense, and the wheel has been around for longer than this guy has.

Still, it's a good highlight to prove how flawed the system is.

Iron Chef Grand Master

Iron Chef

Posted
Posted

Still, it's pretty funny to read the patent application. Amazing how technical you can make a wheel sound when you put your mind to it.

The article's from 2001, btw :P

a20089 Veteran

a20089

Posted
Posted

Old news, the point the lawyer was trying to make is quite true. The petty patent were all just accepted without being checked.

The patent is useless really.

sneakey pete Grand Master

sneakey pete

Posted
Posted

Yes, its accepted, but its useless unless it really is a real patent. quite a handy system, if you ask me, because it allows small time people to chuck in a patent for something that they've made without having to make a big time and money commitment. and if their idea turns out to be good down the track, they can enact the patent (which then will get checked out and passed if its logical). if their idea is useless, its less money wasted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Latest Posts

    • CF.Panda
      R34 25GT Engine Light 21

      By CF.Panda · Posted

      By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • joshuaho96
      R34 25GT Engine Light 21

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • brillo
      Leak from Tokico BM50 Brake Master Cylinder

      By brillo · Posted

      Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Gantai
      R33 GTST Steering Rack (49001-19U05) Rebuild?

      By Gantai · Posted

      PXL_20250828_063541093.TS.mp4
    • Gantai
      R33 GTST Steering Rack (49001-19U05) Rebuild?

      By Gantai · Posted

      Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
×
×
  • Create New...