Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i did a search and went back to about mid 07 and thought no point going further back due to development. or i typed the wrong shit in.

any ways i have an rb25det s1 pulled down and it will be rebuilt with pistons and rods, bearings, studs, gaskets of major brands. the motor will see drift work plus track/grip. is there anything i should spend my money on to avoid say oil problems or somthing simialr which is easy to fix but can cause big problems if i dont.

any help you can give would be great.

cheers, steve.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249968-comman-problems-with-rb25det/
Share on other sites

there is a massive thread based on the oiling problems that plague the RB25.

I'd find it and do everything that it suggests, because most of the problems arise when doing track work, in high revs.

Dry sump will fix everything :P

But upgrade the oil pump

Good catch can and breather setup

Maybe head to sump oil drain

500mls extra oil.

dude, putting a bigger oil pump on, and not doing the rear head drain, or blocking the rear oil feed in the head makes the problem worse.

The whole problem is oil pooling in the head do to bad drainage at high RPM. If you put a bigger oil pump on, it will simply pump more up there and into the catch can, creating a disaster. I've seen this happen - GTR oil pump on a RB25 with no extra drains... or the rear feed blocked. Blew most of the oil into the catch can.. and then when the sump was starved... bang.

You're giving bad advice I'm afraid...

Edited by The Mafia
dude, putting a bigger oil pump on, and not doing the rear head drain, or blocking the rear oil feed in the head makes the problem worse.

The whole problem is oil pooling in the head do to bad drainage at high RPM. If you put a bigger oil pump on, it will simply pump more up there and into the catch can, creating a disaster. I've seen this happen - GTR oil pump on a RB25 with no extra drains... or the rear feed blocked. Blew most of the oil into the catch can.. and then when the sump was starved... bang.

You're giving bad advice I'm afraid...

The advice I've been given by most engine builders is not to restrict the oil getting up top. It's all in freeing up getting it back down to the sump.

IE, you REALLY want a good drain setup to get it out of the head. Then, you're all sweet.

The issue is only at high RPM, so who knows what it's doing when you're blocking an oil feed off and sticking to low RPMs. You might be starving the head of oil slightly.

I did see a drain set-up for RB30 heads on ebay, was simply a fitting tapped into the rear of the head for extra drainage. Would thios also work on an RB25?

I'm just using the fitting that TUF_RX3 from here made, which is press fitting into the back of the head.

Others drill and tap a fitting in.

The advice I've been given by most engine builders is not to restrict the oil getting up top. It's all in freeing up getting it back down to the sump.

IE, you REALLY want a good drain setup to get it out of the head. Then, you're all sweet.

The issue is only at high RPM, so who knows what it's doing when you're blocking an oil feed off and sticking to low RPMs. You might be starving the head of oil slightly.

Well, the GTR have a blocked feed from the factory, and a restricted feed up the front. So less again.

I'm pretty sure SK has said that even with a blocked feed at the back, there is still more than enough oil for the hydraulic lifters in the RB25.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 😅
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 🫠    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
    • But they do so for the other reasons to have a compressor bypass. It's in the name.
×
×
  • Create New...