Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

going back almost 10yrs ago, my mate ran 450awkw on pump98 with 700cc injectors so in theory, your 1000s would probably support the same power level for e85

Just pump abit more rail pressure. I have heard of 550rwkw on 1000s

Good to know. What pressure are you running? And what psi can the id1000's handle?

-5s are now making 490rwkw at 25psi? :huh:

Doubt it'll ever get the MPH to back that up. Same as the GTX35 with 500rwkw that turned out to be closer to 430rwkw on another dyno (like everyone said it was until the owner saw it himself).

Not trying to be rude here either. Just that by now, surely people realise when they have a result that's 40rwkw higher than everyone else that something isn't right?

-5s are now making 490rwkw at 25psi? :huh:

Doubt it'll ever get the MPH to back that up. Same as the GTX35 with 500rwkw that turned out to be closer to 430rwkw on another dyno (like everyone said it was until the owner saw it himself).

Not trying to be rude here either. Just that by now, surely people realise when they have a result that's 40rwkw higher than everyone else that something isn't right?

I'm trying to stay out if this one so I'm glad you brought it up. A lot of people don't like my unorthodox comments which makes it hard sometimes :D

Considering you make the rules around this joint, why not make it a rule to run a mph before posting? Haha, should sort out the posers from the hosers

Oops. How many people are gonna hate me if that happens?

To be honest I couldn't care less what you think anyway r31nismoid.

Your responses are almost always negative.

Every setup is different and every dyno is different, I'm simply showing my results and some footage on what it's like in the car on a track.

Those dyno results are the MAX reading we got out of the car when it was running the vipec and the silly boost curve with the injectors near maxed to achieve the power. It was done purely to see what numbers it could make.

It would never get the mph to back it up though as its not a gtr. Its rwd gtst and is not built or setup for drag.

You would obviously already know that though as your clearly god behind your keyboard and you know everything about everything.

2 things. Actually no 3 things........ Now I have forgotten the third so now its just 2 again.

1. Well done on your achievement, You get a gold star.

2. A GTR is a rubbish drag car. I know I own one. They are heavy and you need 1.3 times the horsepower to get them as fast as a correctly setup rwd car.

O now I remember....... the third thing.......

MPH is MPH. Regardless of the umpteen million ways to make power on a dyno, there is only 2 ways to run MPH.

Power and Weight.

I'm not disclaiming that what you have done has not been achieved, nor that the numbers are skewed but I agree 100% then MPH is without a doubt the most reliable way to ensure what power you have. As for Nismoid being god or god like, I have had many a discussion about this and its pretty much 50/50 at this stage, the jury is still out on this one.

As for Nismoid being god or god like, I have had many a discussion about this and its pretty much 50/50 at this stage, the jury is still out on this one.

I heard he made some chick pregnant once without even touching her. That's gotta be close right?

Haha yeah fair call, but geting the mph to back it up is still a drama for me as traction is abit of an issue in all gears.

Even skidding all the way through 3rd, you'd still get within 2mph of your fastest.

That is of course.....unless you're chicken?

0.jpg

I'm trying to stay out if this one so I'm glad you brought it up. A lot of people don't like my unorthodox comments which makes it hard sometimes :D

Considering you make the rules around this joint, why not make it a rule to run a mph before posting? Haha, should sort out the posers from the hosers

Oops. How many people are gonna hate me if that happens?

Yeah most people don't, but sometimes it's gotta be done because everyone else around then expects it to be "the norm"... And then we end up with more and more threads like "why am i down on power", when in actual fact they are perfectly fine... They are just expecting something that's not reasonable and trying to explain this to such users can be about as productive as belting ones head against a wall (similar to telling the GTX/500rwkw person that it was not possible, but we were all haters :/)

And for the record, there are no mini-me's running around that i know of :ph34r:

-5s are now making 490rwkw at 25psi? :huh:

Doubt it'll ever get the MPH to back that up. Same as the GTX35 with 500rwkw that turned out to be closer to 430rwkw on another dyno (like everyone said it was until the owner saw it himself).

Not trying to be rude here either. Just that by now, surely people realise when they have a result that's 40rwkw higher than everyone else that something isn't right?

I'm trying to stay out if this one so I'm glad you brought it up. A lot of people don't like my unorthodox comments which makes it hard sometimes :D

Considering you make the rules around this joint, why not make it a rule to run a mph before posting? Haha, should sort out the posers from the hosers

Oops. How many people are gonna hate me if that happens?

I had even typed a post about the eyebrow raising figures but thought I would give it a rest haha

It would never get the mph to back it up though as its not a gtr. Its rwd gtst and is not built or setup for drag.

It would actually have higher mph than a GTR with the same power...

You know, less weight :)

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...