Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

going back almost 10yrs ago, my mate ran 450awkw on pump98 with 700cc injectors so in theory, your 1000s would probably support the same power level for e85

Just pump abit more rail pressure. I have heard of 550rwkw on 1000s

Good to know. What pressure are you running? And what psi can the id1000's handle?

-5s are now making 490rwkw at 25psi? :huh:

Doubt it'll ever get the MPH to back that up. Same as the GTX35 with 500rwkw that turned out to be closer to 430rwkw on another dyno (like everyone said it was until the owner saw it himself).

Not trying to be rude here either. Just that by now, surely people realise when they have a result that's 40rwkw higher than everyone else that something isn't right?

-5s are now making 490rwkw at 25psi? :huh:

Doubt it'll ever get the MPH to back that up. Same as the GTX35 with 500rwkw that turned out to be closer to 430rwkw on another dyno (like everyone said it was until the owner saw it himself).

Not trying to be rude here either. Just that by now, surely people realise when they have a result that's 40rwkw higher than everyone else that something isn't right?

I'm trying to stay out if this one so I'm glad you brought it up. A lot of people don't like my unorthodox comments which makes it hard sometimes :D

Considering you make the rules around this joint, why not make it a rule to run a mph before posting? Haha, should sort out the posers from the hosers

Oops. How many people are gonna hate me if that happens?

To be honest I couldn't care less what you think anyway r31nismoid.

Your responses are almost always negative.

Every setup is different and every dyno is different, I'm simply showing my results and some footage on what it's like in the car on a track.

Those dyno results are the MAX reading we got out of the car when it was running the vipec and the silly boost curve with the injectors near maxed to achieve the power. It was done purely to see what numbers it could make.

It would never get the mph to back it up though as its not a gtr. Its rwd gtst and is not built or setup for drag.

You would obviously already know that though as your clearly god behind your keyboard and you know everything about everything.

2 things. Actually no 3 things........ Now I have forgotten the third so now its just 2 again.

1. Well done on your achievement, You get a gold star.

2. A GTR is a rubbish drag car. I know I own one. They are heavy and you need 1.3 times the horsepower to get them as fast as a correctly setup rwd car.

O now I remember....... the third thing.......

MPH is MPH. Regardless of the umpteen million ways to make power on a dyno, there is only 2 ways to run MPH.

Power and Weight.

I'm not disclaiming that what you have done has not been achieved, nor that the numbers are skewed but I agree 100% then MPH is without a doubt the most reliable way to ensure what power you have. As for Nismoid being god or god like, I have had many a discussion about this and its pretty much 50/50 at this stage, the jury is still out on this one.

As for Nismoid being god or god like, I have had many a discussion about this and its pretty much 50/50 at this stage, the jury is still out on this one.

I heard he made some chick pregnant once without even touching her. That's gotta be close right?

Haha yeah fair call, but geting the mph to back it up is still a drama for me as traction is abit of an issue in all gears.

Even skidding all the way through 3rd, you'd still get within 2mph of your fastest.

That is of course.....unless you're chicken?

0.jpg

I'm trying to stay out if this one so I'm glad you brought it up. A lot of people don't like my unorthodox comments which makes it hard sometimes :D

Considering you make the rules around this joint, why not make it a rule to run a mph before posting? Haha, should sort out the posers from the hosers

Oops. How many people are gonna hate me if that happens?

Yeah most people don't, but sometimes it's gotta be done because everyone else around then expects it to be "the norm"... And then we end up with more and more threads like "why am i down on power", when in actual fact they are perfectly fine... They are just expecting something that's not reasonable and trying to explain this to such users can be about as productive as belting ones head against a wall (similar to telling the GTX/500rwkw person that it was not possible, but we were all haters :/)

And for the record, there are no mini-me's running around that i know of :ph34r:

-5s are now making 490rwkw at 25psi? :huh:

Doubt it'll ever get the MPH to back that up. Same as the GTX35 with 500rwkw that turned out to be closer to 430rwkw on another dyno (like everyone said it was until the owner saw it himself).

Not trying to be rude here either. Just that by now, surely people realise when they have a result that's 40rwkw higher than everyone else that something isn't right?

I'm trying to stay out if this one so I'm glad you brought it up. A lot of people don't like my unorthodox comments which makes it hard sometimes :D

Considering you make the rules around this joint, why not make it a rule to run a mph before posting? Haha, should sort out the posers from the hosers

Oops. How many people are gonna hate me if that happens?

I had even typed a post about the eyebrow raising figures but thought I would give it a rest haha

It would never get the mph to back it up though as its not a gtr. Its rwd gtst and is not built or setup for drag.

It would actually have higher mph than a GTR with the same power...

You know, less weight :)

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...