Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

going back almost 10yrs ago, my mate ran 450awkw on pump98 with 700cc injectors so in theory, your 1000s would probably support the same power level for e85

Just pump abit more rail pressure. I have heard of 550rwkw on 1000s

Good to know. What pressure are you running? And what psi can the id1000's handle?

-5s are now making 490rwkw at 25psi? :huh:

Doubt it'll ever get the MPH to back that up. Same as the GTX35 with 500rwkw that turned out to be closer to 430rwkw on another dyno (like everyone said it was until the owner saw it himself).

Not trying to be rude here either. Just that by now, surely people realise when they have a result that's 40rwkw higher than everyone else that something isn't right?

-5s are now making 490rwkw at 25psi? :huh:

Doubt it'll ever get the MPH to back that up. Same as the GTX35 with 500rwkw that turned out to be closer to 430rwkw on another dyno (like everyone said it was until the owner saw it himself).

Not trying to be rude here either. Just that by now, surely people realise when they have a result that's 40rwkw higher than everyone else that something isn't right?

I'm trying to stay out if this one so I'm glad you brought it up. A lot of people don't like my unorthodox comments which makes it hard sometimes :D

Considering you make the rules around this joint, why not make it a rule to run a mph before posting? Haha, should sort out the posers from the hosers

Oops. How many people are gonna hate me if that happens?

To be honest I couldn't care less what you think anyway r31nismoid.

Your responses are almost always negative.

Every setup is different and every dyno is different, I'm simply showing my results and some footage on what it's like in the car on a track.

Those dyno results are the MAX reading we got out of the car when it was running the vipec and the silly boost curve with the injectors near maxed to achieve the power. It was done purely to see what numbers it could make.

It would never get the mph to back it up though as its not a gtr. Its rwd gtst and is not built or setup for drag.

You would obviously already know that though as your clearly god behind your keyboard and you know everything about everything.

2 things. Actually no 3 things........ Now I have forgotten the third so now its just 2 again.

1. Well done on your achievement, You get a gold star.

2. A GTR is a rubbish drag car. I know I own one. They are heavy and you need 1.3 times the horsepower to get them as fast as a correctly setup rwd car.

O now I remember....... the third thing.......

MPH is MPH. Regardless of the umpteen million ways to make power on a dyno, there is only 2 ways to run MPH.

Power and Weight.

I'm not disclaiming that what you have done has not been achieved, nor that the numbers are skewed but I agree 100% then MPH is without a doubt the most reliable way to ensure what power you have. As for Nismoid being god or god like, I have had many a discussion about this and its pretty much 50/50 at this stage, the jury is still out on this one.

As for Nismoid being god or god like, I have had many a discussion about this and its pretty much 50/50 at this stage, the jury is still out on this one.

I heard he made some chick pregnant once without even touching her. That's gotta be close right?

Haha yeah fair call, but geting the mph to back it up is still a drama for me as traction is abit of an issue in all gears.

Even skidding all the way through 3rd, you'd still get within 2mph of your fastest.

That is of course.....unless you're chicken?

0.jpg

I'm trying to stay out if this one so I'm glad you brought it up. A lot of people don't like my unorthodox comments which makes it hard sometimes :D

Considering you make the rules around this joint, why not make it a rule to run a mph before posting? Haha, should sort out the posers from the hosers

Oops. How many people are gonna hate me if that happens?

Yeah most people don't, but sometimes it's gotta be done because everyone else around then expects it to be "the norm"... And then we end up with more and more threads like "why am i down on power", when in actual fact they are perfectly fine... They are just expecting something that's not reasonable and trying to explain this to such users can be about as productive as belting ones head against a wall (similar to telling the GTX/500rwkw person that it was not possible, but we were all haters :/)

And for the record, there are no mini-me's running around that i know of :ph34r:

-5s are now making 490rwkw at 25psi? :huh:

Doubt it'll ever get the MPH to back that up. Same as the GTX35 with 500rwkw that turned out to be closer to 430rwkw on another dyno (like everyone said it was until the owner saw it himself).

Not trying to be rude here either. Just that by now, surely people realise when they have a result that's 40rwkw higher than everyone else that something isn't right?

I'm trying to stay out if this one so I'm glad you brought it up. A lot of people don't like my unorthodox comments which makes it hard sometimes :D

Considering you make the rules around this joint, why not make it a rule to run a mph before posting? Haha, should sort out the posers from the hosers

Oops. How many people are gonna hate me if that happens?

I had even typed a post about the eyebrow raising figures but thought I would give it a rest haha

It would never get the mph to back it up though as its not a gtr. Its rwd gtst and is not built or setup for drag.

It would actually have higher mph than a GTR with the same power...

You know, less weight :)

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...