Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im looking at the next upgrade on the engine...

I have a stock gts25t with:

pod

10psi

racing clutch

3" cat back

im looking at the next upgrade...

things in my mind are:

turbo back exhaust

safc or new comp

fmic

My question to you guys are should I get a safc or a new comp?

i got quoted $1795 with $200 for tuning for a microtech, im still learning about my car so any advice would be welcome... thanks guys..

PS. im sure there was many posts like this but im new... :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25376-bang-for-buck-upgrades/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

fane - suss the forced induction performance section in the general board. this has some really good info...

general suggestions are to set a power target - as this will dictate what mods you do. a full ECU upgrade is better in the long run if you want big upgrades and big power, but that's not for everyone.

Putting a WA spin on it - a lot of people in the forced induction section write off the WOLF as an ecu, because there seems to be a shortage of capable wolf tuners in some parts of east AUS. However, there are a number of guys in WA who have had really good results with WOLFs...probably largely due to the fact that there is a guy in WA who is experienced at tuning them..

That's not an endorsement persae, just information to enable you to make an informed decision. there's a bulkload of info on here about the benefits and disadvantages of each ECU, so go looking and ye shall find(e).

The Wolf can loose the AFM also and has full PC tuning and a life time Australian warranty plus many extra inputs and outputs and air temp comp noto mention if customs get you ( ask Micko)

and the ECU can be upgraded in a few days so it stays current.

SAU members get discounts also.

The wolf has more features and is easier to tune though

can you give any more information here paul? cos alot of people i know who arent on the forum are having to make the wolf vs power fc decision, and its nice to know the facts on both ECUs before makin a $2,000 decision!

cheers

Adam, Sure there are alot of differences between the two, many of which have already been outlined.

MAP senor inbuilt

laptop software

more map sites than the PowerFC

airtemp compensation

inbuilt boost controller

able to control large injectors, unlike PowerFC

rotational idle, anti-lag

programable output's

extra inputs

able to switch between maps on the fly

Hope that outlines some of the reasons it's better.

fane,

If you've got flat spots in your rev range go the AFC :P I personally would go for a Hybrid Front Mount before an AFC next time.

I've got a stock dump pipe, and a 2.5" (restrictive, but "jap spec") cat and ran a pretty good time without an AFC :(

ie. My next mod will be a Front Mount :)

Paul, I'm running 700cc injectors with a PFC and I've heard of cars that run 1000cc injectors with it. Not sure what you consider large injectors but they are plenty big enough for anybody out there :P

They both have their pros and cons. Tuning for the PFC is now a lot easier and better with the Datalogit as Steve has said, and stuff like antilag isn't for street use anyway. Air temp correction is available using this too I believe. From everyone I've spoken to for street cars AFM's are better for driveability, MAP's are better for racing..

How many map sites do the wolf use?? PFC uses 20 x 20 AFAIK..

As others have said it's all about personal preference and depending on what your tuner likes may sway your decision...

You can get brand new PFC's for around the $1,400 mark now..

my 2c.

Brett

Brett, Ask N4SPD about running large injectors with the PowerFC:uh-huh:

Although the Datalogit does increase the functionality of the hand-controller it is still a more tedious process.

Wolf can run virtually any AFM aswell.

PowerFC's are good for GTR's but other than that there loosing the battle unless they decide to update there ECU.

I think if you polled the number of PFC users compared to Wolf users the stats would tell you otherwise.. :P

For mild to mid modded cars either one is more than capable, but once you start getting serious most people don't use either of these.

How good is the standard maps in the wolf? Is it as plug and play as the PFC???

Brett

And datalogit is only available for some PFC's. And not every tuner has access to datalogit, Wolf software is downloadable off the net.

Don't get me wrong, I think PFC's are great. But when you consider local warranty, price etc etc etc, Wolf comes out very very far in front.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the GTR fuel pump. Yellow shows 12V, orange shows earth. The ECU provides the earth to activate the fuel pump relay. The ECU side of teh relay will pull low when the ECU activates. This is the RB20 fuel pump. Almost the same, but a little simpler. You can see I indicated (above) where the 12V line goes down to the RB20 diagram on the overall diagram, whch shows both RB26 and RB20. This is where I show it coming in on the RB20 diagram below. You can see that the dropping resistor is handled differently. When the fuel pump control is not providing earth to the pump, the pump earths through the dropping resistor and thus runs at lower voltage (some is wasted over the resistor) and runs slower. I showed that "not 12V and not quite earth" portion of the wiring in a paler orange. The rest of the wiring that I did not colour on that little section below the pump would be orange when the fuel pump coontroller is providing earth. This drop is handled inside the fuel pump controller in the GTR. Regardless, you can see where 12V is supposed to be, where earth is supposed to be. The key on prime is via the ECU providing the pump for only a few seconds the switching off. You should be able to see that happen.
    • Yeah so when you turn key to IGN the fuel pump should run for a few seconds. If you find the fuel pump relay (and have a multimeter, and a second person) to can check the relay inputs.  One trigger pin should be either fully earthed  The other trigger pin should get 12v from the ECU for say 3 seconds when you turn key to IGN, and at all times that key is at START (note, I said this from memory, it may be the other way around, ie one pin always has IGN 12v and the earth has continuity to earth when you turn the key) One Pin should have a good battery voltage The last pin goes to the fuel pump + Also note that if the power to the relay is good, and the relay is working, it is worth checking the pump has a good earth too. There is a computer in the standard system that increases the earth resistance to slow down the pump when not required, pretty old school and it may have failed
    • All this talk about fuel and fancy ECUs, meanwhile my poor old R32 has neither.... When the ignition is turned on, should there be power running o the fuel pump constantly or just for the few seconds it usually takes to prime the pump? About to go have another look at it, have watched some YouTube vids on how to use a  multimeter and looked at some wiring diagrams but really have NFI what I'm looking for because electricity is invisible  
    • Yuh....but weren't all the supertourers, except maybe the Audis, FWD? I don't recall any of the others being AWD.
    • They ran them in Oz Super Tourers too https://www.supertouringregister.com/register/vehicle/212/ (I'm so old I remember racing with Matthew Fox) They ran them in Oz Super Tourers too https://www.supertouringregister.com/register/vehicle/212/ (I'm so old I remember racing with Matthew Fox)
×
×
  • Create New...