Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It can be done, just wire them in accordingly and use the computer from the S2 and you'll be set. You'll probably have to change the TPS and Tbody if you do so.

I would have to ask why as it's a pretty silly thing to do. Why not just extend the wiring and hide the unit you have?

The S2 coilpack will give you no performance gain so you'll be spending a fair amount of money just so you don't have to look at something.

Mount it on the firewall or something, or near the brake booster if you must.

Seen it done a few times as the ingitors sometimes to get a bit angry with heat (i think a gibson GTR had it this way, and some cars from the motherland)

But ye, as above... a lot of expense and dicking around just to get rid of a small black box

If you paint up the rockers/piping it'll draw attention away from it as another idea

its more a factor of trying to eliminate a common item that screws up, plus i will be buying new coils soon so looking at the option of getting S2 coils and doing away with the igniter all together, as mentioned i have a power fc so no need to change ecu just wondering what else needs to be done wiring wise.

I wouldnt call it a common thing to let go.

No more common than any other part on the long list of sensors that can fail (CAS, AFM, TPS).

It'll cost you 3-4 times the amount to do the swap over than it would be to just grab another ignitor (should it actually fail).

I wouldnt call it a common thing to let go.

No more common than any other part on the long list of sensors that can fail (CAS, AFM, TPS).

It'll cost you 3-4 times the amount to do the swap over than it would be to just grab another ignitor (should it actually fail).

+1

Never seen one actually fail unless subjected to stressful situations like extreme heat when cooking a cylinder head. I know they have failed on one or two other peoples cars but the majority of what people may be reading is when someone has a problem and they say 'Have replaced:' then there is always the PTU. But it's never actually the cause.

So yeah, definitely NOT a common issue.

Brett: I can give you a list of common issues with Skylines if you like, then you can replace all that stuff too if you like.

  • 2 years later...

Reviving the dead.

Having recently sold my S1 33, I am refitting the guys motor from his wrecked S2.

Now, I sold the car with no motor but left the intact S1 wiring harness in the car.. The guys car was an S2 and he still has the entire car to work with. Now what I did not sell with the car are coilpacks..

From my reading and understanding, I will simply need to change the S1 'ignitor plug' with the S2 'coil loom plug'.

Can anyone correct me if I am wrong as I have not bothered to read and trace back the full engine wirring diagram yet.

As a basis of my ability I have done stuff like (and far from limited to) wire redtop SR's into S14s using the S13 ECU and sensors but S14 harness (later nistune and consult capable). So this will be a walk in the park either way, but if someone with some experience can save me (and future readers) some time in saying YES or NO that would be great.

Thanks,

CONFIRMED:

As confirmed by BH_SLO32

The swap is doable and will work fine. Need to trace wiring back to correct cylinders and can eliminate the ignitor box by wiring a harness in and using S2 coils.

I will post more detailed info after Saturday once I've done it.

Have now successfully rewired S2 coils into an S1.

Process is dead simple. The colour coded wires that plug into the S1 ignitor (from ECU) are identically coloured to those that plug into the S2 coil harness (male plug from ECU).

The S2 harness will have a black solid wire (earth) which will not match with its counterpart on the S1, the S1 was black with a yellow trace. It is the middle wire on the 7 pin plug, also identifiable as earth on the ignitor (marked E).

Hope this is helpful for anyone else in my position!

I didnt take any actually.. I can take a photo when I go back next week, I still need to change the coolant temp sensors (lucky I still have the S1 intake in the garage). The S1 ecu and S2 coolant sensors dont seem to be compatible, the dash doesnt show a reading and the ecu shuts the motor down when its idling.

If you want photos of the coil swap let me know.. Its all soldered in and taped up but I can still try get you an idea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...