Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Was a shame I only made it right at the end of the day, but still put the car on the dyno and had a bit of a chat with Jamie and a few others that were hanging around.

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i dont know if its 40kw out or a certain %. My friends 100% standard evo 7 made 150awkw. Does that mean its got closer to 190 with a standard exhaust and standard boost?

A stock standard Evo will not be able to make 190atw. It's probably around the 170ish mark or high 160s.

190kw will require stage 1 mods and increase boost.

However, as many have said, different dynos have different readings.

Edited by sloutch
Was a shame I only made it right at the end of the day, but still put the car on the dyno and had a bit of a chat with Jamie and a few others that were hanging around.

Hey Antony! I PM'd a pic of your exhaust.

Got some last minute pics.

post-46584-1235350877_thumb.jpgpost-46584-1235350866_thumb.jpgpost-46584-1235350893_thumb.jpg

post-46584-1235350904_thumb.jpgpost-46584-1235350921_thumb.jpgpost-46584-1235350934_thumb.jpg

A stock standard Evo will not be able to make 190atw. It's probably around the 170ish mark or high 160s.

190kw will require stage 1 mods and increase boost.

However, as many have said, different dynos have different readings.

More so about 145 - low 150ish.

Thanks for that mate, definatly explains alot :blink:

No worries buddy! :D

More so about 145 - low 150ish.

Yeah thats about right, well at the Kamikaze dyno day, a stock White EVO 7 I saw made about 150 awkW's.

Cuz me and afew friends put a bet on see what it will make and I said 150kW. LOL!

but yeh 200 is easily achieved with an exhaust/cai, ecu and boost.

I was there also (had to go check up on my car thats been sitting there.)

Theres too many variables when it comes to dyno readings so the debate would never stop.

Edited by tenji`

Interesting.

A comparison between my dyno RE Customs and Kamikaze is only 15kw difference.

I logged my run and I attributed it to the fact I had bad fuel and knock.... I've been on holidays for a month, hence the bad/old fuel.

I made 207kw at Kamikaze and 222kw at RE.

The plot thickens =)

Came by at the end of the day and was pleased I could get my car on & off within 20 minutes - no waiting = happy :(

Car is pretty much stock, just a catback exhaust. About 150kw, 11psi MAP reading (my boost gauge reads about 13-14psi, so which one do I use as the accurate figure? Boost restrictor's in place so I figure the lower reading of 11psi is probably right). I figure about 150-160rwkw is about right for a standard gtr, unless someone tells me otherwise?

gtrdyno2.jpg

gtrdyno3.jpg

So you are saying that Dezz's car with a GTRS, injectors, 18psi, etc is really only making 218rwkw. Only 10-20rwkw more than most R33's with std turbo; i really don't think so :(

Or my setup, that is maxing out a 500hp turbo can only produce 284rwkw; highly unlikely.

The dyno is very low reading, but what i thought was consistent, so not all is lost as you can still compare mods to rwkw, between other cars.

Just for the record, with my previous setup, it was dynoed on 3 different dynos (EAS, Autosalon and Racingline) and the 3 read-outs were within 7rwkw of each other. So i am very confident that the EAS dyno is reading accurately.

Maybe it was the way they strapped some of the cars down. My car was strapped that hard that the tyres were well into the guards. This does not allow the car to "climb" onto the front roller and thus will lose traction. With some other cars, the guy running the dyno kept re-adjusting the straps, not sure why he didn't do that with mine as he even commented that the car kept losing traction and the graph clearly shows that at 5300rpm. The other guys that did most the strapping really had little idea, as the main guy kept fixing the straps, when he cbf'd.

same with my car

garrett turbo, 19psi, injectors, pfc etc and making 180rwkw??

i highly doubt it

edit: like i said before standard/standardish cars were making roughly the power they had, where the more powerful cars were down

As long as you use the same dyno to test, thats all you need to worry about etc.

I could get you all a 600rwkw graph for mine, or one with 120rwkw... big deal.

As long as your tuning on the same etc to notice differences, all you need to worry about.

Dyno days are good for a cheap 'check' of AFR/Boost etc

Like @ Dr. Drifts night, i was on 15psi, i thought i was on 12psi, obviously something has changed i need to look at :(

Problem with dynos is that there is no uniform rules on how they should be run etc etc...

whos to know exactly which dyno is the "correct" one.

go run a mph at the strip it will be a good indicator of whether your power is accurate or not.

As long as you use the same dyno to test, thats all you need to worry about etc.

I could get you all a 600rwkw graph for mine, or one with 120rwkw... big deal.

As long as your tuning on the same etc to notice differences, all you need to worry about.

Dyno days are good for a cheap 'check' of AFR/Boost etc

Like @ Dr. Drifts night, i was on 15psi, i thought i was on 12psi, obviously something has changed i need to look at ;)

I disagree. We're talking about legitamite dyno runs here, not temp sensors stuck near exhausts etc.

You can argue that the results are comparable to other cars run on the day, but even that can be disputed (see Aj's vs nick's for example) but at the end of the day you can't argue that that the dyno was giving low numbers for cars with normally decent power.

Hi all, thought I post my result, my car did 140kw on the day its a stock R34 GTT with std boost, only mod is exhaust not full exhaust system, and pod filter. I thnk wen i put on the Sau sticker i got an extra 5kws on each side. :blink:;)

Either it was my first run and the day was great fun, nice 2 meet some of u guys. :)

Came by at the end of the day and was pleased I could get my car on & off within 20 minutes - no waiting = happy ;)

Car is pretty much stock, just a catback exhaust. About 150kw, 11psi MAP reading (my boost gauge reads about 13-14psi, so which one do I use as the accurate figure? Boost restrictor's in place so I figure the lower reading of 11psi is probably right). I figure about 150-160rwkw is about right for a standard gtr, unless someone tells me otherwise?

gtrdyno2.jpg

gtrdyno3.jpg

I was told the dyno was running low on the day at Kamikaze... But ppl are debating weather it is or not...

Friend of mine ran his R32 GTR, which was stock (air box, exhaust, cat and boost) all factory.

He got 155kW at all 4 wheels at RE Customs back in March 2008.

I was expecting alittle more out of the R33 GTR's...

If I were you I would be putting in a aftermarket Down/Front pipes and a high flow cat and it will free up your exhaust a lot more, especialy for GTR's.

+ Other things can effect a dyno run, like doing an oil change will help, check your spark plugs, clean your air filters and the type of fuel you use... A small things can add up...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...