Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not really because its unavoiable to stop swarf entering the sump when drilling the hole for the fitting. I doubt a one way valve is needed but if you want to fit one it shouldnt hurt. The other place you could use is the external oil returns from the head and the turbo (Although I have read on here that its not ideal)

The fittings are easy to get, I have some sitting infront of me right now. I use PSI Parts (from this forum) and www.vpw.com.au They are generally dearer than the catch can itself.

Edited by MintR33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256116-catch-can/#findComment-4415652
Share on other sites

i had mine tapped into my oil return off my turbo

that would be the best way to do it. even weld a hose onto the turbo drain pipe and T it off there. you could also get a T piece made and connect that to the rubber piece that goes from the turbo drain to the block.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256116-catch-can/#findComment-4415969
Share on other sites

I guess you could plumb it into the turbo drain if you use a one way valve. Heres what SK says

You can have a return (drain) to the sump form the catch can if you like. Don't T it into the turbo oil return as it is under a bit of pressure and the oil can run up into the catch can.

:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256116-catch-can/#findComment-4416020
Share on other sites

I personally wouldn't T' it in to the turbo's oil drain.

If you are not concerned with emissions (which I presume your not as chances are you have a larger turbo, injectors etc) hide the catch can under the exhaust manifold, shove a little filter on top and run a separate 3/4" hose to the sump.

The biggest advantage of doing this is the sump is now venting to atmo so there's considerably less pressure if any within the sump, power increases 'slightly' and oil is able to drain from the head back to the sump considerably quicker.

We all know RB's tend to throw a lot of oil in to the head, that oil then struggles to return to the sump.

Remove the sump pressure and it greatly aids oil return from the head.

I personally am a fan of 'slightly' restricting oil to the head combined with venting the sump.

Do it once do it properly. :(

Edited by TheRogue
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256116-catch-can/#findComment-4420708
Share on other sites

im in the same boat, i have a rear of head mod to sump, and now a catch can which will be plumbed into the sump.....\

do i need to have a filter on the line form the can to the sump??? can i make it a straight line and be vented to atmo??? will it affect anything with the oil??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256116-catch-can/#findComment-4420797
Share on other sites

i have a dash 10 screw fitting on the sump, 2 of them, next to each other, one for the hear return, other for catch can,

its on the turbo side so wouldnt the swing of the crank sorta suck the oil down instead of pressureise it???

whats a AN fitting???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256116-catch-can/#findComment-4420964
Share on other sites

i have a dash 10 screw fitting on the sump, 2 of them, next to each other, one for the hear return, other for catch can,

its on the turbo side so wouldnt the swing of the crank sorta suck the oil down instead of pressureise it???

whats a AN fitting???

AN is derived by the standard set by the Army Navy for fittings. They are the type of fittings you have, and are measured in dashes, i.e. dash 10 (aka. -10). Each dash is an increment of 1/16".

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256116-catch-can/#findComment-4421077
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
×
×
  • Create New...