Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The Autospeed article is a good one.

The biggest problem is using the water efficiently. If you spray on heaps it just runs down the cooler onto the ground, and you need gallons of the stuff. If you just mist on a pissy little bit, it is not going to do much.

Probably the best and most efficient way to use water is with a water injection setup. This will help with detonation, but it is not going to increase power potential much, if at all.

If you are happy to cart around a couple of gallons of water, a air/water setup has some real advantages on a street car.

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The power of Water injection isn't if you just install it. As you said it will help with detonation and thats it. Where you win is that with it you can wind up the boost and forward the ignition timing. As I said above, on my Starion I got 50rwhp with it.

Your right with the intercooler sprayer, it is great for street use, my mate runs the circuit from AutoSpeed and says it is really good.

I stuffed around with water injection. Runs off a 10psi hobs pressure switch and sprays mist into the intake of the turbo

20rwhp from extra timing and boost. Had a small fmic so it spun 285rwhp with a supra fount mount. On very cold nights was best

Only problem with Hobbs switch system is that it runs on boost and does not consider demand. For example, my GTR comes on full boost at 4000rpm and stays that way until 8000rpm. The engines consumption is a lot different between these rpms. The hobbs switch method of tuning only allows for a compromise setup.

I also had this same system on my Starion, hobbs switch spraying water into the turbo intake.

Hi GTRman1992, sorry if I seem to be picking on you but your post "on race tracks you are not allowed to drop fluid, so they cannot be used".. I had better tell the Evo drivers in GTP, because all the teams I have seen run them. We also run windscreen and headlight washers as well, ooops big problem.

The water spray actually doesn't find its way onto the track when we are racing, it tries to blow into the engine bay via the intercooler first and then the radiator. By the time it hits the exhaust manifold there is only steam, no liquid as such.

Oil and fuel droppings are of course another matter.

BTW, we have just received an EVO 8 Ralliart Group N kit and it has a water spray for the intercooler. Seems like it's not a passing phase traffic light GP item for them. The problem we have is that the rally cars spend a lot of time at low speeds on dirt and sideways to boot. As a result there is not anywhere near as much airflow through the radiator. Waterspray helps heaps then, not just intercooler but the engine water radiator as well.

Maybe some of the driftos should look at it, considering the number of over heated and blown engines we have seen lately.

Hope that adds to this interesting thread.

Merry Xmas to all

Only problem with Hobbs switch system is that it runs on boost and does not consider demand. For example, my GTR comes on full boost at 4000rpm and stays that way until 8000rpm. The engines consumption is a lot different between these rpms. The hobbs switch method of tuning only allows for a compromise setup.

I also had this same system on my Starion, hobbs switch spraying water into the turbo intake.

This is a good point... How would you propose to activate the water injection then?

Must have got it wrong, unless the fluid rule only applies to drag racing ???

Your Ralliart kit is as you said for cars not getting enough air flow through the intercooler. This agrees with what I have been saying. It is not needed for track cars getting big air flow through the front mount. I am not arguing with this point.

See the Auto Speed online magazine for a circuit. Else you can have a button on the dash ??

just something I've been curious about... when you grab a hot pan with a wet cloth the heat transfers quicker than if you would have used a dry cloth with air inbetween its threads. Hence proving that water transfers heat quicker than air.

Now... if the ambient temperature is higher than that of the intercooler (as is the case on may hot summer days in aust), would the water assist the intercooler in gaining heat rather than dissipating it?

Thinking about this a bit more, with evaporative cooling in cooling towers and such, you try to keep all the cooled surfaces completely wet. So you spray heaps more water than is actually evaporated.

So how about catching the water under the intercooler and returning it to a storage reservoir underneath, and using a decent pump to really keep evey fin on that cooler seriously wet. Some sort of scavenge pump (like with a dry sump) might also work if it comes on with the main spray pump. I realise this may not be practical for several reasons, but it would be the theoretical ideal. But it would certainly solve the water on the road problem.

As far as water injection goes, what about using a second set of suitably sized fuel injectors, and powering them off the main injectors via a suitable electronic drive circuit. This would keep the petrol/water ratio near constant, and you could easily arrange to switch off these extra injectors below a certain boost threshold. If your aftermarket computer has a spare PWM output you could map the water injection easily enough. This should conserve water as well as get the most benefit.

There might be some problems though with corrosion if you feed water through an EFI pump, injectors, rail and regulator ? It would not surprise me if some of these were made with stainless steel components, but have no idea if this is the case. Anyone know for sure ?

Hey....... I just think up these ideas, it is up to you to make them work.

Hay Warpspeed. Interesting ideas. I don't think you could catch the water dripping off the intercooler as you have to remember you are hammering along while spraying so it will blow through the intercooler. Although while stationary it might be worth a thought. Cooling the core waiting to take off.

I don't think the ambient air will ever be hotter than the air blowing through the intercooler, even on a hot day. When a turbo is pumping the air can easily get over 100deg I believe.

I've had a look into using standard injectors for the W/M system but came up with the same problem with corrosion. Thats why I'm building a system using spray jets and regulating the pump speed to ensure the ideal mix.

If you do come accross some water happy injectors I'd love to know as that is HEAPS easier.

Quite right. At high speed the water is going to be blown all over the engine. But if you are going a million miles per hour, and have a good airstream, you might not actually need the water. Or perhaps you could turn it off at high road speeds, or in the higher gears?

OK, almost science degrees aside because I only have a Mech Eng Degree and a Masters of Engineering, here is what I have found by using Autospeed's IC water spray controller on the stock IC with a high resolution high freq temp probe in the post IC airflow, Rigoli modded stock turbo and my home made boost controller @11psi.

On a 35 degree Melbourne day I am maintaining charge temps 20 degrees below standard.

Without the water spray the temps take forever to drop from over 57 deg to 40 deg but with it running with the fuzzy logic from two bimetallic temp elements it is a matter of 30-50 seconds to get to 28 deg or so down from 42-43.

Now I haven't fully applied the 'scientific method' but I am pretty secure with my findings as a definite improvement over an air only IC. I also now run a throttle position induction water spray post IC and find that a positive step as well for suppressing detonation.

My advice...you have the autospeed link, spend $150 and try it out and stop supposing. It works and works well.

Maybe one day I will tell you about oxygen injecting my Lynx to a 7 sec 0-100 machine.

As far as water injection goes, what about using a second set of suitably sized fuel injectors, and powering them off the main injectors via a suitable electronic drive circuit. This would keep the petrol/water ratio near constant, and you could easily arrange to switch off these extra injectors below a certain boost threshold. If your aftermarket computer has a spare PWM output you could map the water injection easily enough. This should conserve water as well as get the most benefit.

A couple of questions.

Why use fuel injectors at all? Besides all the obvious corrosion problems, they won't finely atomise the water at all, which is a primary goal when designing a water injection system.

The only reason I could see for using fuel injectors like you are talking about is if you were to use 6 of them and plumb them into the runners, secondary set of injectors-style. But this doesn't work either as you need to inject the water far enough up the intake piping for it to absorb the heat from the intake air, heat up as it travels along the intake piping until it hits the cylinders where it turns to steam. Somewhere between "before the turbo compressor", to "just after the intercooler" is best. Injecting it straight down the runners won't work at all.

Merli

the water spray into the induction limits detonation in the cylinder, not so much by cooling the air but a poorly understood phenomenon that needs more research. The water takes up enough space that it's cooling (compressing) effect is negated by that but it cleans the cylinder and suppresses the dets, and is therefore a good thing.

It does cool the charge a bit, but you have to spray it into at least the runners to each cylinder to get even distribution (discussed above).

As skylinegeoff saif the other effect (as I understand) is that it increases the density of the charge and therefore supresses the pre-ignition (detonation). This allows you to run more boost and more agressive timing.

Merli

the water spray into the induction limits detonation in the cylinder, not so much by cooling the air but a poorly understood phenomenon that needs more research. The water takes up enough space that it's cooling (compressing) effect is negated by that but it cleans the cylinder and suppresses the dets, and is therefore a good thing.

Intake charge cooling is DEFINITELY one of the benefits of water injection, and not taking advantage of it would be quite silly.

Water injection works in three ways. 

Firstly, when the water is injected into the intake system prior to the cylinder head, the small droplets absorb heat from the intake air. Water has a very high specific heat rating (it can absorb lots of energy while only slowly increasing in temperature) and so the intake air is initially cooled. 

Next, the small drops of water start to evaporate. Water has a very high latent heat of evaporation (its change of state absorbs a lot of heat) and so the intake air charge is cooled still further. 

Finally, when the remaining water droplets and water vapour reach the combustion chamber, steam is produced. This acts as an anti-detonant and also keeps the interior of the engine very clean, so preventing the build-up of carbon "hot spots".

As you can see, each stage of the water changing from liquid to gas absorbs heat, and this takes time. There isn't enough time to fully realise the full effect of water injection if you inject the water straight down the runners.

It does cool the charge a bit, but you have to spray it into at least the runners to each cylinder to get even distribution (discussed above). 

As skylinegeoff saif the other effect (as I understand) is that it increases the density of the charge and therefore supresses the pre-ignition (detonation). This allows you to run more boost and more agressive timing.

It increases the density of the charge by lowering the temperature of the air. That's all.

So if you're not taking full effect of the cooling (e.g. by injecting the water down the runners), you're not increasing the density of the charge as much as you could be, in turn you won't be able to increase boost or advance timing as much as you could be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Back again. I returned to Japan in Jul/Aug to spend time with the car on my birthday and remind myself what all the sacrifice and compromise is for. It happened to line up with the monthly morning meet in Okutama, which I have been wanting to go to for a long time. It's a unique event at a unique spot with really rare, interesting, and quirky cars. It's where all the oldheads and OGs gather. The nighttime scene at DKF certainly has its place and should be experienced if you're into cars, but there's too much bad attention and negativity around it now. IMO the better time is Sunday morning at DKF or Okutama; it's more chill and relaxed. I'm glad I was finally able to go, but not sure it's worth the drive from all the way from Nagoya immediately the day before, unless I was already staying in Tokyo for the days right before the meet, because you have to wake up quite early to make it in time. Funnily enough though I didn't drive the car all that much this trip because it was just too damn hot. While there were zero issues and running temps were nominal and the A/C was strong, RBs already run crazy hot as it is. Sure, it took it all like a champ but something about driving these cars in the ridiculous heat/humidity bothers me and makes me feel like I'm asking too much of it. I'm just me being weird and treating the car like a living thing with feelings; I'm mechanically sympathetic to a fault. Instead I was mainly driving something else around - a KX4(silver) 2001 X-Trail GT, that I acquired in May. There's a few different flavors to choose from with Xs, but visually it's the Nissan version of the Honda CR-V. Mechanically it's a whole different story as this, being the top-trim GT, has an SR20VET mated to a four speed auto and full-time AWD! It was a very affordable buy in exceptional condition inside and out, with very low mileage...only 48k kms. Most likely it was owned by an older person who kept it garaged and well-maintained, so I'm really happy with how it all worked out. It literally needs zero attention at the moment, albeit except for some minor visual touch-ups. I wanted something quirky, interesting, and practical and for sure it handily delivers on all three of those aspects. I was immediately able to utilize the cargo and passenger capacity to it's full extent. It's a lot of fun to drive and is quite punchy through 1st and 2nd. It's very unassuming -in the twisty bits it's a lot more composed than one would think at a glance- and it'll be even better once I get better tires on it(yes, it's an SUV but still a little boat-y for my liking). So...now I have two golden-era Nissans in silver. One sports car and one that does everything else; the perfect two-car solution I think👍 The rest of the trip...I was able to turn my stressed brain off and enjoy it, although I didn't quite get to do as much as I thought. I did some interesting things, met some interesting people, and happened into some interesting situations however, that's all for another post though only if people really want to know. Project-wise, I went back to Mine's again to discuss more plans and am hoping to wrap that up real soon; keep watching this space if that interests you. Additionally, while working in the tormenting sweatbox that is the warehouse, I was able to organize most of the myriad of parts that my friend is storing for me along with the cars, and the 34 has a nice little spot carved out for it: And since it can get so damn hot in there, that made it all the more easy to remove all the damn gauges that have mostly been an eyesore all this time. Huzzah. I was standing there looking at the car and said 'f**k it'. The heat basically makes the adhesive backing on the gauge mounts more pliable to work with, so it was far less stressful getting this done. I didn't fully clean it up or chase the wiring though; that will happen once I have the car in closer possession. Another major reason to remove all that stuff is to give people less reasons to get in my car and steal s**t while it's being exported/imported when/if the time comes, which leads us to my next point... ...and that is even though it's time in Japan is technically almost up since it's a November car and the X would be coming in March, I'm still not entirely sure where my life and career is headed; I don't really know what the future looks like and where I'm going to end up. I feel there's a great deal of uncertainty with me and as a result of that, it feels like I'm at a crossroads moreso now than any point in my life thus far and there are some choices I need to make. Yes, I've had some years to consider things and prepare myself, however too much has happened in that time to maintain confidence and everything feels so up in the air; tenuous one might say. Simply put, there's just too much nonsense going on right now from multiple vectors. Admittedly, I'm struggling to stay in the game and keep my eyes on the prize. So much so in fact, that very recently I came the closest I ever have before to calling it quits outright; selling everything and moving on and not looking back. The astute among you will pick up on key subtext within this paragraph. In the meantime I've still managed to slowly acquire some final bits for the car, but it feels nice knowing there's not much left to get and I'm almost across that finish line; I have almost everything I'll ever want for my interpretation and expression on what it is I think an R34 should be. 'til later.
    • Thanks for that, hadn’t used my brain enough to think about that. 
    • Also playing with fire if they start to flow more air down low than what the stock twins can. It's not even up top you need to worry, it can be at 3000rpm and part throttle and it's getting way more flow than it should.
    • Any G40/1000 or G40/1250 results out there?  
    • You still want a proper tune on the stock ECU though. Stock tune + stock ECU with GT-SS/-9s is probably playing with fire if you're running more than stock airflow/power.
×
×
  • Create New...