Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey delta force..let me get this rit..

u want around 340hp correct?

but u dont wana upgrade the ecu?

the most common problem wit rb25 is the ecus..

becoz of r&rs..we lose out on alot.

esp. mid-range...

but u got a chiped ecu dont u??

dont no how thats gona work wit an upgraded turbo..

anyways..i sent my exhaust housing to hypergear hiflow..

they built me a ATR28 with a G2 core rated to i believe 430hp..i think??

anyways its bein on now for about 3 weeks..still running it in and its going very well :)

there was abit of mod. to get it to fit..but after that...its all sweet!!

and ive got stock ecu, afm & injectors..

and is hold 14psi fine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

without hitting r&r's and i havent max airflow either!!!!!

well thats what my afc neo is saying...

but yeah..2 tuners here said it wouldnt run..or i wouldnt be able to boost past 7psi...

they wer so full of crap...lol

just tryin to sell me one of there turbos..plus supporting parts... etc...

also i believe u cant run a z32 on stock ecu anyways...not sure if u can on a chip thou,??

Now put a ball bearing core in the same wheel combo and then we might have a decent test :)

Comparing two turbo's, with different wheels, to try and show something about bearing type... doesn't work.

Same as the other business trying to plug business without paying trader fee's by comparing old coil packs with his new ones...

Its just not cricket!

yeah.i no i wasnt comparing..lol

i was just simply giving my info and my input..

and saying that he wont max afm/inj/ecu

if he or was to fitted another turbo now...

but again depends on wat turbo he gets :D

Now put a ball bearing core in the same wheel combo and then we might have a decent test :(

Comparing two turbo's, with different wheels, to try and show something about bearing type... doesn't work.

Same as the other business trying to plug business without paying trader fee's by comparing old coil packs with his new ones...

Its just not cricket!

Sorry just have to say some thing. So business who pays your fees makes them a better business and for business who's not a sponsor gets plugged by you?

We were a sponsor for your site for more then 10 month so yes you did take my money. For us to continue our sponsorship You need to change the way of how you setup this site. Just like how NS and Boost cursing has done. So goods from traders do gets exposed to the public on the main page and we did got heaps more clicks on our ads there. I'm very certain lot of other traders do feel the same way.

Edited by hypergear
Sorry just have to say some thing. So business who pays your fees makes them a better business and for business who's not a sponsor gets plugged by you?

We were a sponsor for your site for more then 10 month so yes you did take my money. For us to continue our sponsorship You need to change the way of how you setup this site. Just like how NS and Boost cursing has done. So goods from traders do gets exposed to the public on the main page and we did got heaps more clicks on our ads there. I'm very certain lot of other traders do feel the same way.

No, a sponsor is someone who PAYS to advertise, drum up business, whatever. I never said anything about them being "better" than someone else. They are just following the route of fairness.

We have an obligation to those people to ensure only they are getting their monies worth by not letting other businesses drum business and so on for free.

Your in business, you should be across this concept fairly easily.

And to date, i have not seen any such thoughts/recommendation in the feedback section about your ideas... nor has any other trader said anything.

Well I don’t see how you tried to protect us when we first started on this forum as a sponsor 3 years ago, you gave quite few awful comments just like some others did. As a web master you’ve should’ve never disencourage or negatively comment on a specific Sponsor. You took our money to advertise our stock and encourage with our sales correct?

I fully understand where you stand and how you prefer to manage your site. As a business trader we want the max exposure of our goods to the public.

for example compare at the No. of Clicks on an average traders ad on NS forums vs publishing date vs No. of replies to this forum. You will notice there is a quite abit of difference. and that made us happily sponsoring them for the past 3 years at $190 per month.

Look I'm not a website manager, I'm just giving some advises on a trader’s prospective. by changing the layout, increase business exposure and give the right support will attract more advertisers and maximize your profit as a advertising agent.

any way. I'm replying to those threads giving correct assistance and information. Not advertising our goods.

Edited by hypergear

Were you doing bad tests and so on then too?

Quoting pricing, delivery and so on - is advertising.

As for the trading amount, we are far less than $190/month, so it stands to reason doesnt it? (considering ours is basically half)

Less exposure, less cost.

Also dont forget NS.Com is run as a business (profit). We are run to exist (non profit). Its a community here, not a commercial entity.

There is a key difference. People pay money as much to advertise, as to help out the community that is "SAU". Giving something back in some ways as oppose to just worrying about pure profit which is fair enough if thats how you want to be.

All products are going though in different stages of R&R and development to get close the point of perfection. We've paid you to advertise our products not publically bagging and damage our business image. Regardless if this website is your going business or not, We've paid you in full for your service and you've delivered it horribly. I sincerely hope this does not happen again to any other trade members in this community.

As for advertising, this is your website, so you decide how to run it. since you are a none-profit organization I'm just giving you some advise, and with additional income you can make this site even better and bigger.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What is the current snail?
    • Never an issue with boost control. No weird boost issues pre throttle at partial throttle like you're suggesting. It worked.   As for all the turbo damage claims, they all were started by aftermarket BOV companies. At least turbo timer companies had SOME truth about them, except people failed to realise that except for in extreme circumstances, that small amount of driving you do to park/ through pit lane etc, is enough to not have a need for a turbo timer.
    • I tell people all the time this stuff runs on a 2 MHz 8-bit MCU. The math is a bit arcane, they do a lot to get around their limited resolution and so on but it works great as-shipped. So if an 80 to 160 MHz modern 32-bit MCU can't make it work you've really screwed something up badly. Your average graphing calculator is faster these days, god forbid we start talking about what's hiding in vapes or some stupid internet-connected "smart appliance".  I suspect the lore about off-throttle surge damaging turbos must be very, very old if it was ever true. I still don't think off throttle surge is good for turbos because you're rapidly having air going in and out of the turbo on top of rapid loss in shaft speed which presumably does impart some kind of unusual load on the rotating assembly. As for the recirculating valve, I believe Nissan actually in a press slide deck of some kind explained for the RZ34 they found it improved response. Prior to that they kept the throttle cracked open instead which causes rev hang and because the throttle/engine is a substantial restriction a ton of the energy in the air stream is lost just to pumping past it. Recirculating helps reduce energy loss by bringing the intake side of the compressor up in pressure so it's not working as hard to pull air in. In DCT cars where they can slam gears I believe Porsche hangs the throttle wide open with no fuel injection to keep turbo RPMs as high as possible during the shift. As for running post-throttle boost source, I would be concerned that at partial throttle on boost you would have driveability issues. It would be constantly trying to run crazy amounts of boost before the throttle to compensate for the throttling effect. Maybe with a much more sophisticated boost control setup you could activate a solenoid that goes from a conventional 3-port setup to something that allows the wastegates to see full vacuum in that specific case? 
    • Did you clean everything out? Take all intercooler piping off, empty the intercooler of oil, clean the exhaust out, etc? Intercoolers make great catch cans... Which makes them less useful for intercooling... But very worth cleaning out, along with all adjoining piping.
    • Update Got turbo back from hypergear, installed everything etc. Bled coolant, wasn't smoking so I thought beauty she's sorted now. Went on a drive, car up to temp, let it idle for about 15 seconds, gave it some gas...nice puff of smoke again. Fml No doubt my turbo was pretty worn anyway but nonetheless frustrating that the problem persists.
×
×
  • Create New...