Jump to content
SAU Community

Strange Ebay Oil Cooler Design

SECURITY

By SECURITY,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

SECURITY Grand Master

SECURITY

Posted
Posted

I was trawling through ebay and found this: http://cgi.ebay.com.au/NEW-12-V8-RACE-EXTE...%3A1|240%3A1318

As im looking for an oil cooler i was trying to think how effective it would be and came up with this;

- the fins dont penetrate deep enough into the oil for it to be effective in transferring heat

- oil pressure on startup will take longer to generate depending on where it is located (the picture in there is showing it to be mounted up high).

looks like just another ebay cheapo item to me. What are your thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258200-strange-ebay-oil-cooler-design/
Share on other sites
QWK32 Veteran

QWK32

Posted
Posted

i think the normal tube/fin style coolers would be more efficient. the one you linked doesn't look like it would have the surface area contact to the cooling fins that a convertional oil cooler would. also i'd think the air flow through a tube/fin coller would be better at removing heat than a larger "solid" cooler would.

JMW Mentor

JMW

Posted
Posted

Yeah agree with you on looking cheap and possibly not doing a great job of cooling. Aluminium does transfer heat well, but it would really need to be mounted with fins running front to rear of the car to work the best. I'd stay clear of it.

BeEnAr Experienced

BeEnAr

Posted
Posted

I've actually seen something like that on a couple of race cars, looks like it works like a massive heatsink like on a PC. Would work better plumber in at the front of the car or somewhere it would get airflow I rekon.

**RB2530** Proficient

**RB2530**

Posted
Posted

My feeling is that these would not work very well at all when compared to more traditional oil coolers..These are the reasons why...

1. Although the oil is able to penetrate the cooling fins the main flow of oil would be through the core of the cooler as this is the path of least resistance. The oil penetrating the fins would stagnate in the fins as there is nothing to cause this oil to flow. So you would end up with most of the oil flowing through the centre of this thing and the cooled oil would remain in the fins.(just as if it was just a length of hose)..Oil has a much lower thermal conductivity than aluminium and therefore you could argue that the fins would be better off if they were solid.

2. The most efficient heat exchangers maximise the ratio of contact surface area vs fluid volume of the hot and the cool fluids..In this case the fluids are oil and air...The most inefficient cross section for doing this is circular...The most efficient is squat rectangular sections that are wide and short. This give the most surface contact between the two fluids. Just like traditional oil coolers...

3. Also for an air type cooler to be effective, free flowing air must flow over a large area to maximise the heat removed. With this design if you had air flowing at 90 degrees to the cooler, the fins themselves would trap air between them which once again would stagnate. At the back of the cooler (the side not facing the airflow) you would also get a low get a low pressure region. This would reduce the heat tranfer from the fins to the air.

So IMO these are worth every cent you pay for them...which is not much by the looks of it...They would be slightly better than no cooler at all but not worth the effort to fit one...

BeEnAr Experienced

BeEnAr

Posted
Posted

I wonder if it would work better if you mounted it longitudinal <--- is that right, rather than horizontal i.e with the opening at the front of car and the exit at the rear of car?? That would eliminate the airflow restriction but I agree traditional works for a reason so why do it differently if it's not as good

**RB2530** Proficient

**RB2530**

Posted
Posted
I wonder if it would work better if you mounted it longitudinal <--- is that right, rather than horizontal i.e with the opening at the front of car and the exit at the rear of car?? That would eliminate the airflow restriction but I agree traditional works for a reason so why do it differently if it's not as good

Changing the orientation so that the air travels along it fixes one shortcoming but creates another...What would happens is the air at ambient temperature would hit the front end of it and as it travels along the fins, the air would be heated...This happens in all coolers...the air traveling out is warmer than the air traveling in...this must happen for the cooler to be cooling...but as the air heats up less and less heat is transferred into it so it becomes less effective at removing heat..

Also the relatively small projected cross sectional area of the cooler that would be exposed to the airflow would be very limiting...If you consider the cooler functioning as follows it will become obvious...

The road speed air at ambient temperature flows over the cooler that is heated by the oil..heat is absorbed by the air as it is drawn out of the oil...Now if you consider the setup in 2D, and that the road speed air has the capacity to absorb only a certain amount of heat...It follows that as the projected area of the cooler increases, the ability of the cooler absorb heat increases directly proportional to its area...Eg If the diameter of this round cooler was say 50mm and it was compared to a standard cooler that was 100x100mm, the 100x100 would cool at least 4-5 times more...(yep couldn't be bothered working area of 50mm dia but you know what I mean)..

So this means that with coolers the projected area of the cooler is more important than the cooler depth. ..So no matter which way you orientate this cooler it wont work better than a conventional one because its projected area to the airflow is small...

hope this makes sense...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • brillo
      Leak from Tokico BM50 Brake Master Cylinder

      By brillo · Posted

      Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Gantai
      R33 GTST Steering Rack (49001-19U05) Rebuild?

      By Gantai · Posted

      PXL_20250828_063541093.TS.mp4
    • Gantai
      R33 GTST Steering Rack (49001-19U05) Rebuild?

      By Gantai · Posted

      Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • PranK
      R35 GT-R production ends after 18 years

      By PranK · Posted

    • SteveL
      Leak from Tokico BM50 Brake Master Cylinder

      By SteveL · Posted

      I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...