Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As i said before the car drives really well for the power it makes.we all know you cant use 550kw on the street so as for anything over 350kw being usless your right.

But i built the car to race on a wed night street meet at the drags on radial street tyres.

No its not a race car if anyone wants to go for a cruise im more than happy to go :D

Paul i dont know why they didnt have it in shoot out mode ill ask and let you know

Thanx

Edited by superjet760
  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i just cannot see how that car could be usefull in getting good times on the drag strip. I would like someone to explain it to me if possible.. (serious request)

If that japs were getting good times with a smaller capacity then the 3L motor here then why won't it work is the question, the car still has a full boost band of 4,000 rpm which at this stage for a " street tune " is more than enough, coupled with the power and extra torque from the larger cc motor is should do very well?

How will it be at a drag strip?

Old school vid, same turbos, 2.6L though

Fast forward to 4.26

It will be a monster :D

Whats the time limit bfore WSID boot people out? 10.00?

but does it have such a narrow band of power?

How will it be at a drag strip?

Old school vid, same turbos, 2.6L though

Fast forward to 4.26

It will be a monster :D

Whats the time limit bfore WSID boot people out? 10.00?

i soo enjoyed that video :)

As i said before the car drives really well for the power it makes.we all know you cant use 550kw on the street so as for anything over 350kw being usless your right.

But i built the car to race on a wed night street meet at the drags on radial street tyres.

No its not a race car if anyone wants to go for a cruise im more than happy to go :D

Paul i dont know why they didnt have it in shoot out mode ill ask and let you know

Thanx

Hell I am happy to go for a cruise !!!!!!. You drive, I ride shotgun in the passenger seat.!

But fantastic result and a Gorgeous car

i just cannot see how that car could be usefull in getting good times on the drag strip. I would like someone to explain it to me if possible.. (serious request)

Well with some well suited ratio's in the box and diff and getting the power to the ground without wheelspin is the way it will cut a good time at the track! Just because it makes huge power later in the rev range doesn't make it worse off, you just have to match the power & revs to the right gears and tyres..

rev limit 9000 rpm on standard crank? Be careful with that man...

RIPS has been known to spin his up to near 10,000rpm - his 240Z's RB30 has been running standard crank for as long as it has been running and it started off in the 10s and has been working through to low 8s with a LOT of runs under its belt, the stock cranks seem to do ok with proper care etc.

Check this out:

RIPS has been known to spin his up to near 10,000rpm - his 240Z's RB30 has been running standard crank for as long as it has been running and it started off in the 10s and has been working through to low 8s with a LOT of runs under its belt, the stock cranks seem to do ok with proper care etc.

Check this out:

2nd that, they've been running consistant low to mid 8's with a stock crank, have been for a while now, their car and other customers cars over 1000hp are also running stock cranks and reving to high numbers, and they've never had an engine failure, ever, just goes to show the rb series cranks can handle some spin when prepped right!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...