Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ive just finished builing my new single turbo setup with a t04z use to have twin t517zs making 511 hp on 22 psi

with the to4z it makes 353kws at 15psi as soon as you wind the boost up fom 15 psi it stops making the power goes back wards its like its hitting a brick wall

afrs are 12

ignitons not breaking down was thinking the cams are to small or the standard plume and throttle bodys could be doing it any help would be appreciated thanks tim

engine specs

built bottom end

pored head

tomei type b springs and cams

new guides

800cc injectors

m and w cdi ignition

haltech e11v2 with 3 bar map

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cat/exhaust or wastegate?

the car has

no cat striaght pipe

three and a half inch from turbo back straight through exhaust

and a turbo smart 50mill pro gate

i think they should be up to the task

need some more info. What amount of ign timing? does the timing drop off very rapid once it hits the higher load point? Sounds like its running out of cam though. What specs are the cams. What comp ratio is the engine. etc.

Just throwing around some ideas.

need some more info. What amount of ign timing? does the timing drop off very rapid once it hits the higher load point? Sounds like its running out of cam though. What specs are the cams. What comp ratio is the engine. etc.

Just throwing around some ideas.

the timing is about between 32 at 5000 and 20 at 9000 the cams are 260 by 9.15 and the comp is 8.3

possibly a boost/exhaust leak then? have you checked all your piping, vacuum hoses, exhaust flanges and the rest?

theres no leaks checked every thing in the leak department ive also done a compresion test today and they are all between 120 and 122

the car has

no cat striaght pipe

three and a half inch from turbo back straight through exhaust

and a turbo smart 50mill pro gate

i think they should be up to the task

Have you dropped the exhaust from before the cat to be 100% certain?

Hmm. Sounds very odd. That turbo should be able to generate much more hp.

Any other mods done at the time of the turbo change or just the turbo change.

only the turbo gate and manifold and exhuast to cat all new and its also laggy compared to others on the forum should a t04z with a .82 split housing make 22 psi before 6000

Exhaust manifold design?

Where are the cams set also

the exhaust manifold is a 1.5 inch steam pipe equally length runner at 500 mill each and the cams are set to 0 on inlet and exhaust should such little cams be really lumpy

the manifold collector has to have all the runners peaked for good flow. How lumpy? will be a little lumpy.

Who is the tuner.

So many factors will cause lag.

Can give you the name of a really good tuner in the area, may be able to help you out

the manifold collector has to have all the runners peaked for good flow. How lumpy? will be a little lumpy.

Who is the tuner.

So many factors will cause lag.

Can give you the name of a really good tuner in the area, may be able to help you out

mark at mrc has been tuning it and he cant figure out why its not making power and why its so laggy he does a good job its lumpyer then the rb26/30 he tuned with 290 by 12 cams what do you mean by peaked

the car has no cat i dont run one as the car is a track car

I know that...

Well from where the "de-cat" pipe is, same spot, matters not... So i take it as a NO you have not tried the 10mins quick test to totally discount exhaust

All 6 runners merge into a peak and then into the turbo unlike some of them that have runners facing eachother.

Have you guys played with cam timing yet?

all the runner come to a point then into the turbo tryed playing with the timing on the old setup but didnt make much of a difference only moved the powerband around no gains from it whats the name of the tuner that you no thanks tim

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And make sure the belts are tightened appropriately too.
    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
×
×
  • Create New...