Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ive just finished builing my new single turbo setup with a t04z use to have twin t517zs making 511 hp on 22 psi

with the to4z it makes 353kws at 15psi as soon as you wind the boost up fom 15 psi it stops making the power goes back wards its like its hitting a brick wall

afrs are 12

ignitons not breaking down was thinking the cams are to small or the standard plume and throttle bodys could be doing it any help would be appreciated thanks tim

engine specs

built bottom end

pored head

tomei type b springs and cams

new guides

800cc injectors

m and w cdi ignition

haltech e11v2 with 3 bar map

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cat/exhaust or wastegate?

the car has

no cat striaght pipe

three and a half inch from turbo back straight through exhaust

and a turbo smart 50mill pro gate

i think they should be up to the task

need some more info. What amount of ign timing? does the timing drop off very rapid once it hits the higher load point? Sounds like its running out of cam though. What specs are the cams. What comp ratio is the engine. etc.

Just throwing around some ideas.

need some more info. What amount of ign timing? does the timing drop off very rapid once it hits the higher load point? Sounds like its running out of cam though. What specs are the cams. What comp ratio is the engine. etc.

Just throwing around some ideas.

the timing is about between 32 at 5000 and 20 at 9000 the cams are 260 by 9.15 and the comp is 8.3

possibly a boost/exhaust leak then? have you checked all your piping, vacuum hoses, exhaust flanges and the rest?

theres no leaks checked every thing in the leak department ive also done a compresion test today and they are all between 120 and 122

the car has

no cat striaght pipe

three and a half inch from turbo back straight through exhaust

and a turbo smart 50mill pro gate

i think they should be up to the task

Have you dropped the exhaust from before the cat to be 100% certain?

Hmm. Sounds very odd. That turbo should be able to generate much more hp.

Any other mods done at the time of the turbo change or just the turbo change.

only the turbo gate and manifold and exhuast to cat all new and its also laggy compared to others on the forum should a t04z with a .82 split housing make 22 psi before 6000

Exhaust manifold design?

Where are the cams set also

the exhaust manifold is a 1.5 inch steam pipe equally length runner at 500 mill each and the cams are set to 0 on inlet and exhaust should such little cams be really lumpy

the manifold collector has to have all the runners peaked for good flow. How lumpy? will be a little lumpy.

Who is the tuner.

So many factors will cause lag.

Can give you the name of a really good tuner in the area, may be able to help you out

the manifold collector has to have all the runners peaked for good flow. How lumpy? will be a little lumpy.

Who is the tuner.

So many factors will cause lag.

Can give you the name of a really good tuner in the area, may be able to help you out

mark at mrc has been tuning it and he cant figure out why its not making power and why its so laggy he does a good job its lumpyer then the rb26/30 he tuned with 290 by 12 cams what do you mean by peaked

the car has no cat i dont run one as the car is a track car

I know that...

Well from where the "de-cat" pipe is, same spot, matters not... So i take it as a NO you have not tried the 10mins quick test to totally discount exhaust

All 6 runners merge into a peak and then into the turbo unlike some of them that have runners facing eachother.

Have you guys played with cam timing yet?

all the runner come to a point then into the turbo tryed playing with the timing on the old setup but didnt make much of a difference only moved the powerband around no gains from it whats the name of the tuner that you no thanks tim

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...