Jump to content
SAU Community

Inner West Crew Whoretown (toowong/st Lucia/kenmore/indooroopilly And Sometimes Sunnybank?)


Recommended Posts

yup. I know the gsm pretty well and the DP.

What ya need

Alyssa is looking at getting an auto K13 or an i20 (in green or black) and wants to trade in her 2004 1.5 auto 3dr Getz. And get a really good deal :)

blown exhaust?

i didnt hear about that... i had the volume down low (wife was sleeping)...

Yea it is where they let the engine over run when they brake to keep exhaust gasses go over the rear diffuser to help in stabilty. aparantly mercedes powered cars are allowed to but the renaults are not for some reason..

but who cares.... GO WEBBER

team orders with red bull meaning webber wasn't allowed to overtake vettel and get 2nd.

Discuss......

Oh and hello everyone! I'm back :action-smiley-069:

Didn't Ferrari get into a bit of strife a few years back for the same sort of shenanigans with Schumacher being given a win he didn't deserve thanks to a 1-2 Ferrari finish?

Team orders are allowed now, but I think last night it was a case of common sense. Webber wouldn't have been able to get the job done so I think the team was just making sure they didn't take each other out on the last corner.

Mangs,

Got the bike working on the weekend only for it to f**k out on me again this morning. Think there is something wrong with the choke on the carb.

Mangs,

Got the bike working on the weekend only for it to f**k out on me again this morning. Think there is something wrong with the choke on the carb.

Trade it on boost for a used mountain bike inner tube and a fish tank, then drive the GT-R :thumbsup:

i think most are upset cause its half way through the season and now cause one team has protested they all have to change parts on their cars...

its poor to think if one team threatens the FIA with pulling from F1 they jump...

id just say "ok, see ya"

they need to set one set of rules, then consider/announce changes at the end of a season...

or if they announce early have them not take effect until next season...

Morning Mangs,

Fark, it's only Tuesday :(.

I'll give you 4 GPS units and a half eaten pizza...

You're a half eatern pizza

Today I got turkey slapped by a ratchet and an oil drain, and bukaked by a battery. Fail.

Sounds like my kind of party! :banana:

wished people would pick other places to commit suicide. that incident at geebung this morning made my trip in here 1:15..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...