Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I put some height adjustable suspension in my car on the weekend. The old suspension was low - 330mm at the front. I'm now thinking 340 front, 330 rear. What are you guys running? The car sees a bit of track and already has plenty of adjustable arms/bushes to get the geometry right.

Have a look at the roll centre.

With the GTST I find if I go any lower than ~345-350mm it looks as if the lower control arms start to level with the cross member (up front) and then if I push it to 340mm the cross member is noticably lower than the lower control arms.

Dare say its approximately the same with the R32 GTR.

I've got the front of mine at 345 and rear at 350 as when the rear is slightly lower it tends to understeer and simply feels a little nicer with it sitting just that little bit higher.

From what I've been told don't go too low as it messes with the roll centre.

Edited by TheRogue

My understanding is that the rear should be 10mm lower; See Here;

"Rake angle (or front to rear balance) plays a huge part in how the GT-R corners. Lowering overall by 1" as you say is OK, but you must make sure you keep the front (as measured from the centre of the wheel to the arch) is around 10mm higher than the rear. If you have a neutral (or worse rear elevated) rake the car will understeer like a bitch.

"

And IIRC SK used to quote a 10mm difference. Sort of makes sense as you'd expect the front wheel arches to be cut higher in the guard to give more clearance to the wheels that steer....

Many people forget that as the lower cross member lowers it can badly affect the rear tow and cause a raft of issues.

At stock height for example. If the wheel raises or lowers the rear tow could for example change by 1 degree in and out as the wheel rises and falls.

If you lower the car to extremes you will probably get assymetrical tow changes causing crappy bump steer performance.

The best way to lower the car without causing this is, lower suspension arms like the Ikeya items which lower the bottom ball joint leaving the suspension geometry as per stock

My understanding is that the rear should be 10mm lower; See Here;

"Rake angle (or front to rear balance) plays a huge part in how the GT-R corners. Lowering overall by 1" as you say is OK, but you must make sure you keep the front (as measured from the centre of the wheel to the arch) is around 10mm higher than the rear. If you have a neutral (or worse rear elevated) rake the car will understeer like a bitch.

"

And IIRC SK used to quote a 10mm difference. Sort of makes sense as you'd expect the front wheel arches to be cut higher in the guard to give more clearance to the wheels that steer....

Front 355

Rear 345

Try and get about 6 to 6.5 front caster

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did and sync timing with light 
    • Have you done the Ignition Sync Wizard in the AEM software?
    • Find out what RPM it was idling at with the IACV unplugged. It's very weird that the rpm didn't change at all, and then it stalled. When it stalls is it nearly like a switch off, like you've turned the engine off? Or is it more stutters and sputters and coughs to death over a few seconds? Or does the RPM just slowly keep going down and down? Have you done a test of trying to start it with the AFM unplugged? Does it still die?     If you Follow Josh's advice on using Nistune to check the voltages (which is a perfect method!) if you see anything out of wack voltage wise, THEN get the multimeter out and read the voltage directly at the sensor. If the two vary, then you're now looking for a wiring issue vs a sensor issue. So be aware, what the ECU sees, may not be what the sensor is actually saying too...
    • You very likely need to get it on a dyno and tune it. My assumption is, you've got an RB25DET tune in it, which has a different manifold, different injectors, and different cams as a minimum. What O2 sensor are you running?   When you say it runs extremely rich from idle all the way to redline, is this just free revving it you see that?
    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
×
×
  • Create New...