Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What is the formula to achieve 400rwhp?

My injectors (also stock items) were at 72% duty at 250rwhp on 0.8bar boost. I've been told by my mechanic not to run more that 1.1bar boost through my high flowed turbo (R33) because of my internals. 300rwhp would be nice if I knew how to reach it.

Mark

  • Replies 335
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I got to 296.9rwhp on the stock turbo, so all 300 requires is an upgrade turbo.

I'm using a GT30 500hp turbo on mine, Wolf 3D, Greddy plenum, R34 GTR intercooler on mine, but there are plenty of other setups that will give you similar power, a good tuner is a must.

Pauls car was one of many cars being set up for a Dyno comp to run on another Dyno so i would have to be stupid to jack up the power when its about to run in front of hundreds of people on a different Dyno.My Dyno was calibrated less than one month ago.

At our test day ( the day we got 411 out of Pauls car) we also had near standard GTSs making less that 200rwhp.If you use a very good pump and rising rate fuel reg plus a good ecu you can feed the samesort of power on stock injectors but use standard pumps and you will struggle to feed 300.We will get Dyno Dynamics to prove this car and post the results but it is really making 411rwhp, ask any sucker thats been silly enuff to go for a ride.

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

JimX, I wasn't disagrreing with you there, just saying that most of the dyno's we (SAU WA) tend to use in WA are the accurate ones, and we leave the high reading ones to Silvia owners who need all the help they can get:D

i DEMAND you take that back.. :shake: although im in qld.. i dont really care about dyno readings at the moment.. my car is pretty much stock.. 4.3 diff gears and exhaust (std dump) oh and its rb20.. i ran a 14.0 with an apparent 220.5 hp reading (this was with 1.0bar boost) in shootout mode at what i am lead to belive was subzero's dyno.. i know there is a lower time in my car because i used sh*tty tyres, screwed my start up and had axle tramp.. i think the best way is to find your mate with the power on the street and go from there.. but then again its illegal.. so organise something.. meet in the middle of aussie and use rolling starts.. then no one can blame sh*tty starts.. yea well i forget what the whole point of writting something was.. but just because you have all this wonderful power doesnt mean youll run a good time.. maybe a dyno is the only way to tell..

rbs13, I was only have a tease of all my mates with Silvia's, it's an on-going rivalry. I think there great cars, and the power to weight is in your advantage. I was beaten on the day I got 411 by a Datsun 1600 with an SR20 pumping out 433rwhp, so I have much respect for the engine:D

MRK25T, I don't recommend pushing the stock turbo as hard as I did to get that sort of power, but I was planning on replacing it anyway, so we upped the boost. With an aftermarket turbo you should be able to make 340rwhp easy on just over 1 bar, if your not then something isn't working right.

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

MRK25T, I don't recommend pushing the stock turbo as hard as I did to get that sort of power, but I was planning on replacing it anyway, so we upped the boost. With an aftermarket turbo you should be able to make 340rwhp easy on just over 1 bar, if your not then something isn't working right.

I've got a high flowed standard R33 turbo along with the stuff you have on your car (I have a powerFC though) and tuned at .8bar it only managed 252rwhp. I asked if it could get anywhere near 300 if I increased the boost to 1.1bar and they said youd be lucky to get 280. The car seems to be holding back.

Originally posted by Hicks

Thats terrible. I'd be taking my car elsewhere, Mrk25t.

Indeed Hicks.

I've got a Z32AFM now (standard was maxing out) and i'm just thinking about getting a HKS2530 turbo to replace my high flowed one. I've never been to unigroup (or whatever the place is called) but from feedback on this forum they seem to be quite good.

Maybe I should get my car checked out by them first with a list of recommendations of what to fix/replace. Getting the car tuned is expensive :)

Originally posted by Steve

Mark, do you have cooler and exhaust?  Cos the power you are quoting is below what the stock turbo is capable, so I dont know where whoever sold you the turbo gets off calling it a high flow.

- somethiing is just not right there, sorry to say.

3" HKS catback exhaust + hi flow cat and front/dump pipe (probably no-name brands).

FMIC I think is Micks metalcraft

I also have regulator, pump, profec b, powerfc, clutch, adj cam sprocket (which wasnt touched in the tune), non ball bearing high flow standard R33 turbo, pod filter.

A good manifold will help, but I think you need to get the set up you have sorted first (thats what I would be doing) as you 'should' be getting alot more.

To give you an idea, I took my car to morpowa (here in SA) after having a tune and not being 100% happy. He (martin donnon) got me an extra 26rwkw, with no increase in detonation, and better idle and part throttle response.

He asked me what setup I had, told me what sort of power I should be expecting and low and behold, thats what I got.

Having someone who knows what they are doing makes a huge difference - bit like Steve SST and his wolf ecus :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...