Jump to content
SAU Community

You Went From Maf To Map ..

rtune

By rtune,
in Forced Induction Performance

 Share

Recommended Posts

rtune Experienced

rtune

Posted
Posted

I've done a search and seen it said that MAP loses some transient throttle response .. aka .. driveability.

Has anyone experienced the before and after and can state clearly what it took away, if anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bloodzkull Community Regular

bloodzkull

Posted
Posted

i did the change. also went from a pfc to a wolf v500, with a much more in depth tune so i can't really coment on possible response loss, as i actually gained a lot of throttle response.

only ill effect i noticed was a small increase in the amount of times the car cranked over before it started. like maybe half a second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maximajim Community Regular

maximajim

Posted
Posted (edited)

There are many automakers who use MAP based systems with no problems at all, so why would you have problems with a map based standalone? If there were problems you can probably chalk it up to bad tuning or just a poorly designed standalone. I have zero problems with my standalone map based system even though I have a 5bar map sensor. Cold start, Drive-ability, Closed loop wide band Cruise, and deceleration are perfect.

Edited by maximajim
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rezlo Community Regular

Rezlo

Posted
Posted

I went from ECR33 PFC L-jetro and converted it to run the GTR's D-jetro, Being that I mapped both setup's I can say this, the D-jetro was much easier to get nice dead stable AFR's, Drivability is better and fuel consumption is up by .5L better per 100km. (this was with no other mods done at all besides ECU change, I use FCedit, dual widebands, EGT and dual knocklinks when mapping RB's)

Best thing, no idle mess around! car just runs better all round. D-jetro's idle stabilization by timing is fantasic as well! almost as good as VEMS's

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rtune Experienced

rtune

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

so far then .. it sounds all good.

I wasn't told map has any "problems" but that it isn't a good choice if you plan

to do mountain driving, as altitude (or big temp changes) muck with the tune vs maf.

My tuner says map will "feel different" in a possibly negative way, he didn't elaborate.

And people on sau have posted before that map is 'for race cars' and maf is for street,

and someone else on sau said map didn't work as well with multiple throttle bodies.

So I figured I'd ask if people had experienced a car before vs after with as much else

the same.

Edited by moneypit
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rtune Experienced

rtune

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I would say buy a ecu based on his recommendation or find another tuner who is competent in tuning a map system.

He should know that a good standalone will have temp and barometric trims (if needed).

He recommended going map, ecu is hks f-con,

but he just said it will feel different, and indicated I might not prefer it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Strik3r Experienced

Strik3r

Posted
Posted

MAP sensor here too. Given the choice, i'll always go MAP over AFM. The number of AFM related issues that seem to pop up all the time is crazy. I went through 3 AFMs on my old car, and it still never was quite right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
N1GTR Grand Master

N1GTR

Posted
Posted
MAP sensor here too. Given the choice, i'll always go MAP over AFM. The number of AFM related issues that seem to pop up all the time is crazy. I went through 3 AFMs on my old car, and it still never was quite right.

100% agree

MAP user here :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MBS206 Grand Master

MBS206

Posted
Posted
so far then .. it sounds all good.

I wasn't told map has any "problems" but that it isn't a good choice if you plan

to do mountain driving, as altitude (or big temp changes) muck with the tune vs maf.

My tuner says map will "feel different" in a possibly negative way, he didn't elaborate.

And people on sau have posted before that map is 'for race cars' and maf is for street,

and someone else on sau said map didn't work as well with multiple throttle bodies.

So I figured I'd ask if people had experienced a car before vs after with as much else

the same.

The issue with multi throttle bodies and MAP, is the turbulunce.

You can get the same MAP reading, for a different throttle reading, and it plays havoc.

Good ECU's, like the Adaptronic, Motec, (I also believe Haltech, ViPEC and Autronic) run MAP vs TPS tuning.

I run MAP with the Adaptronic, and it has no issues at all.

Actually, it has quite a few benefits... I can run NO BOV, and not have a single issue.

I run an oil coated air filter, and not have it flood my AFM giving shit readings, resulting in poor idle...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
N1GTR Grand Master

N1GTR

Posted
Posted

Yeah mine doesnt take long to crank, and doesnt hunt on cold start. It does everything "normally" compared to an AFM based ECU.

....Well, except for having dramas when the AFM's get dirty and play up :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MBS206 Grand Master

MBS206

Posted
Posted
Ford XR6 Turbo runs map and no issues there. So the whole map = race car is a little off.

The 1JZ and I believe 2JZ also run MAP...

Lots of manufacturers cars run MAP from the factory

My car takes a couple of cranks to fire, but that is purely the ECU, and NOTHING to do with it being MAP based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted
I went through 3 AFMs on my old car

Brand new each time or 2nd hand? I'd be interested to hear the reasons why 3 brand new AFM's would have died in a short period.

If 2nd hand, then well... thats pretty much a pointless statement :D

Every AFM that i put in (new) works/worked fine without issue.

Ive played around with 2nd handies lately (due to time constraint) and had nothing but problems, but i accept that because im playing around with used parts and not brand new ones.

That said - go with what the tuner reccomends. He is tuning it afterall...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
paulr33 Grand Master

paulr33

Posted
Posted

MAP vs TPS is pointless

guess what TPS is when you floor it?

%100 and never changes

much like manifold pressure when your reach full boost

so you go back to 1 dimensional tuning, the RPM axis

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Russco Proficient

Russco

Posted
Posted

Straight MAP was poor on light throttle compared to AFMs but I had multiple throttle bodies (RB26). Redid the tune with MAP over TPS (combination of the 2) and found driveability every bit as equal as stock AFMs.

Best point => if I blow a cooler pipe/vacumm hose at the drags I can drive it home as is... unlike AFMs which would instantly foul the plugs. Best move I ever made was getting rid of the AFMs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R33S2 Grand Master

R33S2

Posted
Posted

I went for a MAP because my tuner prefers it, he put it this way to me, although the AFM is a good bit of gear he has had more problems with that one piece of equipment than any other but finding out it is the AFM to be the problem is the real reason he prefers the MAP sensor, as for driveabilty I didnt really notice anything except the power increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • ev1r34
      Rear Main Seal (RMS)

      By ev1r34 · Posted

      What are the torque specs for those 6 bolts on the retainer plate and 4 oil pan bolts? I'm currently tackling this job during an auto to manual conversion... I thought this would a 5 minute job! 
    • Desean Strickland
      Forged piston skirt coating or no coating?

      By Desean Strickland · Posted

      Tryna decide if I should get a skirt coating on my cp 2618 forged pistons that im about to order. Anyone have first hand experience with a forged RB with coated or non coated piston skirts? Is it worth it and does it make much difference? And for people who went with 2618 pistons with no skirt coating how long has your engine lasted? The engine is an rb25/30 and main concern is  that It will be a daily car and will probably see a fair bit of short distance driving, have been told by my machine shop and my tuner that generally a forged engine lasts around 40,000kms before needing a rebuild. Would a skirt coating make much of a difference? cheers 
    • MBS206
      Can anyone shed some insight on this Turbo?

      By MBS206 · Posted

      From now on read it as minus 5 and minus 7 instead of dash, and you're correct...
    • XoRoKu
      R32 GTR fuel gauge not working despite fixing fuel level sender

      By XoRoKu · Posted

      Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • GTSBoy
      rb20de neo +t conversion - boost pressure sensor needed?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
×
×
  • Create New...