Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

I'm looking for a turbo for my RB30DET project. My goal is 800 - 850hk on boost, and another 100 - 150hk NOS shot on the 1/4 mile track. (Flywheel HK)

Have 2 garretts and one tubonetics in mind.

GT4094R

GT4294R

Or the new GTK 850hk turbo.

8000 rpms limit, high lift cams etc etc..

Which turbo would be my be my best bet? Want as early spool as possible, but still within my goals

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/263268-help-to-choose-turbo/
Share on other sites

Whats "hk"?

A to4z will do 800hp if you get the rear housing correct. Cheap, easily available, heaps of parts made to suite - its a pinless procedure :bunny:

hk is horse kower. but I want to know what parts to suite are and how the procedure is pinless? where do the pins normally go in this suite? :down:

Hk is Hp.. Will use HP form now on. hehe.

Have searched, but cant find conclusive info. Especially on the GT-K series.

Im leaning towards the GT4294R, in a 1.01 trim.. How do you think that will boost on the 3 liter? I have seen the GT4294r compared to a HKS t51 kai unit? Is that correct?

If you want the results of those turbos on 3L motors, have a look on www.supraforums.com www.supraforums.com.au and www.mkiv.com. They've got all the results of turbo vs turbo on 3L based motors albeit 2JZ's instead of RB's :down:

I'd lean to a GT4294R for that power level if I were doing it. The GTK turbos I've heard references to being fairly laggy compared to a lot of the other turbos on the market but are probably tough as anything.

I am also leaning towards a GT4294R.. In one of the smaller trims. 1.01 is the one I'm looking the most at.

In the supra forums I cant seem to find that much info on gt4294r.. its either gt4088r they talk about, or waaay bigger (GT45) than my goals. Or HKS.

I think especially talking to people who have gone that crazy, the consensus seems to be that once you are heading for something more drag orientated and if its moving well out of the range of full on street friendly turbos such as the GT3582R and at most the T04Z (on a 3litre) then its best just be accepted you won't be getting much boost pulling from low revs etc you may as well just go for something silly as if you've got bored with 600hp, whats going to stop you getting bored with 800 after a while.

Thats not necessarily my opinion, but I know people who have been there and done that and they tend to feel that way. The GT4294R is a reasonably proven turbo, the GT4094R is marketed to be fantastic but I'm still not 100% sure on it - I've seen contrasting views on them and while they seem that they could be good I don't think they fit into the proved group, hence why I'd go for a GT42R as there are plenty who have made that kind of power with them and on a 3litre it shouldn't be too bad. There were quite a few around a few years ago that had GT4294Rs I think, just pretty sure they went up to GT4202R or bigger. If you want just around the 800hp mark then a GT4094R should get you there and may be a bit more lively under foot on the road - though the impressions I get is they still have the "large turbo" feel about them.

Hi.

Thanks for the replys. :-) I dont care if i need to be over, say 4500 rpms to get some action.

Arrrg its tough to deside.

The rule "get as small a turbo that will meet my demands" is in my mind.. And 800hk is the goal. So maybe I should just try out the GT4094R.. ? The maps for a GT4094R looks like they fit my goal.

The car should be more track day oriented than drag oriented... But its all how you define each? Monday I will try and call the shop were i usually by my turbos, and have talk with them. Monday the turbo will be bought.

The turbonetics GT-K series I have crossed out now.

So the finalist are GT4094R, or the GT4294R. And if using the rule "get the smallest turbo that fit the goal" applies then it should be a GT4094R.

What do you recon?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...