Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So Lee and Adrian which turbo would be better suited to drag racing?

with some MT streets etc and a pulp tune?

with mt streets and a e85 tune?

with good street rubber?

u guys both have strong r33 gtst's so in your personal opinions?

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So Lee and Adrian which turbo would be better suited to drag racing?

with some MT streets etc and a pulp tune?

with mt streets and a e85 tune?

with good street rubber?

u guys both have strong r33 gtst's so in your personal opinions?

Lets just say i'm more than happy with the midrange/top end of the HKS3037.

Gotta compare apples with apples, i'm still running standard manifolds (which lets face it would be pretty much at their limits) and Adrians has a Plazmaman intake and etm high mount.

If i was a betting man i would put my money on Adrians in a Drag race with the extra top end.

100kph roll on in fourth i think would net a different result. Different animals but both lots of fun :P

So Lee and Adrian which turbo would be better suited to drag racing?

with some MT streets etc and a pulp tune?

with mt streets and a e85 tune?

with good street rubber?

u guys both have strong r33 gtst's so in your personal opinions?

Good times tend to rely on mph so I think the bigger of the 2 turbos will win in most of the above cases!

E85 allows the 3037 to punch well above it's weight, so the midrange is very similar, I think the 25 head has reached it's flow limit so without cams and head work it's hard to say if the 3582 has reached it's full potential!

If both were tuned on ulp I think the gap would be alot wider in the 35's favour,

I would love to try both setups on the same car oneday.

i run a low mount GT35, 16psi makes 270kw n i fkn love it, turbo hits that hard when it comes on, if u want something that excites u id go for the 35. Im not knocking the brilliant powercurves that alot of the people have with smaller turbos but i think at the end of the day i feel my car is a bit more exciting to drive with the 35 than say a 30. Personal preference of course.

If both were tuned on ulp I think the gap would be alot wider in the 35's favour,

I would love to try both setups on the same car oneday.

Agree with the ULP comment but reckon the E85 masks the size of the 3582 on a 2.5ltr. Should tune for PULP for fun one day and see how the car responds.

Another guy i know with 3540 running PULP on a 25 is quite laggy but hey his tune might not be optimum.

Years ago when i was playing with V8's (ally headed clevo's mainly) my main aim was always averages not peak power and thats where i think the 3037 is the right choice for a 25.....Throw a 25/30 into the mix then its a different story 3582 would be a better choice for sure again my opinion only.

Trying turbo's on same car wouldn't net much difference imo, the engines both done similar work.

Either way they are both weapons.

So Lee and Adrian which turbo would be better suited to drag racing?

with some MT streets etc and a pulp tune?

with mt streets and a e85 tune?

with good street rubber?

u guys both have strong r33 gtst's so in your personal opinions?

A GT3582R is clearly capable of more power, but the guy was saying he is going to run 1bar-1.3bar on a standard motor - ie, where you won't see the advantages of the bigger turbo. If we were talking a built motor with 1.4+bar then I would be voting the GT3582R without hesitation.

both Lee's and Adrian's motors are stock. thats why i thought it was a good comparison. and u have to remember as well there talking a hks 3037 not a garret 3076

HKS 3037 IS a Garrett GT3076R. Garrett sell the GT3076R with no turbine housing, suppliers/aftermarket outfits sort one out to their disgression. HKS do so by buying it, putting on their own .68a/r turbine housing (my Garrett has the .82a/r which has virtually imperceptible amounts more lag and flows more) and a cute little bellmouth on the intake which covers up the surge slots which some people find a put off. Oh yeah, and the HKS badge.

The 52T GT3037 is a bit different but no one really uses them on RB25s, they're more suited to smaller motors and don't flow as well.

Taken from Nengun.

The HKS GT Series Turbos are based on ball-bearing Garrett units and like the HKS Signature Series have re-engineered compressor and turbine wheels along with specific A/R and trim levels.

HKS carefully tested Trim and A/R levels along with different inlet and outlet diameters to achieve optimal power

As you can see they are quite a bit different to the Garrett 3076. HKS have built the turbo around the engine so to speak. Garrett have everyone in mind with their turbo housings/wheels etc. I think thats what Dangerman was referring to.

As you can see they are quite a bit different to the Garrett 3076. HKS have built the turbo around the engine so to speak. Garrett have everyone in mind with their turbo housings/wheels etc. I think thats what Dangerman was referring to.

Yeah, but a 56T HKS GT3037 (ie, your turbo) being "based" on a Garrett turbo is that they have got a GT3076R CHRA and put an HKS turbine housing on it. TBH being the same core I don't differentiate it. Either way its better for a basic stock internal RB25 which someone is going to push 1.3bar boost MAX into.

Yeah, but a 56T HKS GT3037 (ie, your turbo) being "based" on a Garrett turbo is that they have got a GT3076R CHRA and put an HKS turbine housing on it. TBH being the same core I don't differentiate it. Either way its better for a basic stock internal RB25 which someone is going to push 1.3bar boost MAX into.

re-engineered compressor and turbine wheels.

You missed that bit^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Whats 1.3 bar around 20psi? Like to know why you think thats the max cause mine loves 23psi and some. Maybe your talking a PULP tune not E85.

Have you actually measured the wheels to confirm this?

:ninja:

IMO its marketing hype at its finest. The differences, if any, are minimal

I'm not that interested that i'm going to measure wheels etc, just seems (to me anyway) that guys with 3076 Garretts flip off HKS3037's as being nothing more than a pretty comp cover. I believe otherwise which is why i purposefully went down the HKS path to the detriment of my hip pocket........(350rwkw on E85 with standard manifolds seems to reflect my thoughts also). Again these are only my opinions read into them what you will.

re-engineered compressor and turbine wheels.

You missed that bit^^^^^^^^^^^^^

No I didn't. This is really beyond the scope of this thread, believe what you want really. I'd love to know what people who think the HKS GT3037 uses different wheels think of the fact that you can fit an HKS turbine or compressor housing onto a Garrett GT3076R with absolutely no modification and the wheels fit perfectly. Having all exactly the same measurement it makes it seem like the same wheels. For rofls if you ever have you turbo off, you should google the CHRA tag on the turbo and see what you get. I've done it with an "HKS" turbo before with much amusement.

FWIW, my turbo even had "GT3037-56T" on the core.

Whats 1.3 bar around 20psi? Like to know why you think thats the max cause mine loves 23psi and some. Maybe your talking a PULP tune not E85.

1.3 bar is less than 20psi, its the boost level the guy who made the post said he was looking at running a maximum of. You are quite right, the GT30R will not be maxed out at that level - which is why I am saying there is no point going bigger if the GT30R is more than capable of it.

Seeing as you mentioned PULP at all, here is a dyno overlay of a .82a/r GT3076R and a .82a/r GT3582R both running 32psi on a fully worked Honda B18C (car that I believe touched single digits down the 1/4) on C16:

gt30rvsgt35rhighboost.jpg

Edited by Lithium
I'm not that interested that i'm going to measure wheels etc, just seems (to me anyway) that guys with 3076 Garretts flip off HKS3037's as being nothing more than a pretty comp cover. I believe otherwise which is why i purposefully went down the HKS path to the detriment of my hip pocket........(350rwkw on E85 with standard manifolds seems to reflect my thoughts also). Again these are only my opinions read into them what you will.

You'd hope with a HKS3037/GT3076 would do 350 on E85 considering they are 300rwkw on PULP :ninja:

id feel the same way if i spent a couple extra grand on a hks rather then a garrett for basically the same thing

Some people just know everything don't they^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I actually only paid 3K for the complete HKS set up, cant see ya getting a complete Garrett turbo, Dump pipe, turbo to AFM pipe etc etc etc for 1K unless you know something i dont. Oh BTW internally gated 3076's that i know of have trouble with spike if you dont relieve the gate (more money) something i didn't have to worry about.

You'd hope with a HKS3037/GT3076 would do 350 on E85 considering they are 300rwkw on PULP :thumbsup:

they may be capable but not many get there on std engines, 270-280 seems the average

as for hks vs garret, unless you get a good deal like Lee did I dont think it's worth the extra $$

I read somewhere that the HKS have there own blade design on the comp wheel, but yeah physical dimensions are the same

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, yeah would need to do the flywheel although the 6 bolt NA clutch can handle a 20de if just wants to replace the stocker.
    • No it's fine. Heat sleeve is a thing. With oil running through it it is unlikely. Engine off heat soak can be a thing though. There is no way that you have a leak through the hose. That has pressure behind it and any small hole will turn into a large one in very short order. It is so much more likely to be leaking from the connection.
    • Really? That's piss weak. I didn't know they hobbled the shitboxen that badly. OK. So probs need to buy a flywheel too. But that's not too bad.
    • Hi all. I already posted some newbie-ish questions here and there but this will be my first "big" post. Last summer I went and fulfilled a kind of childhood wish, because I just thought I needed this experience in my life no matter what. The car I bought is a mildly modded 1995 BCNR33 Vspec. It was repainted to a metallic orange color all around and it had all windows reseated. Not so well done black respray in the trunk and a metallic black in the engine bay. From outside it looks very nice except for a minor paint error on the roof and the rear spats needing new adhesive tape. The inside is pretty clean and no broken plastics, missing or faded buttons. Even the adjustable mirrors and trunk antenna work like a charm. Despite a moderately long list of issues I don't (yet) regret buying this car. Most mechanical problems are just due to age, like worn rubbers here and there. The underside sadly has lots of corrosion, especially to the back. It looks like it either has been driven in the winter for a while or it lived near the saltwater in Japan, the rust is nothing terrible but it'll require to be looked after. Mostly panel gaps and all the mounted components underneath are a bit crusty, but I don't think anywhere has progressed so badly that there's going to be holes. Front right jacking rail is crushed and needs some care so it doesn't develop into a rust crater at some point. Worst part is definitely the strut towers. I thought they looked fine but after taking off the strut bar I noticed that it actually started bulging up on the passenger side. Probably would have passed on the car or negotiated down by some thousand Euros more if I had noticed this before buying, but here we are. Trunk area also has signs that there was a water leak to the interior once but nothing too crazy, I guess lots of Skylines had this at some point. As for the list of (known) issues, I'll try to make this compact. I hope the coloring is self explanatory. Mechanical: -Various busted or soon-to-be busted rubber bushings and ball joints. Will replace ball joints with OEM or better and bushings with polyurethane where possible. -Shaking steering wheel at above 80kph -downshift from 5th to 4th is a bit crunchy unless I rev-match, might just try to renew the shifter assembly, but it's not a priority issue -tailshaft centre bearing could use a replacement, is it worth going 1-piece tailshaft as it doesn't look too fresh all around? Chassis: -underbody corrosion on many spots and in hollow spaces, needs to be treated -corrosion on many bolts, hoses, lines, suspension components, subframes, will be treated when replacing of the bushings is needed as time goes on -strut tower top panels and some of the surrounding panels are rusty, so needs fixing. Will look into doing this with a buddy in the winter, otherwise bite the bullet and pay a professional -driver side door is misaligned to the body and needs to go a slight bit more inwards -both door windows are misaligned and have an airgap where the window meets the door at the B pillar -The Aerocatch latches for the bonnet have locks but no keys, need new keys. -driver side door window is kind of gritty and could use a polish -damaged jacking rails and front frame rails, from people lifting the car the wrong way, might have this fixed by a bodyshop Electrical: -Nismo tachometer is just bouncing and displaying nonsense, supposedly worked fine when the stock ECU was still in the car -An old Greddy boost controller sits on the dash which will be removed as it servers no purpose anymore. -a led segment rpm gauge is on the steering column, will probably also be (re-)moved once the Nismo tacho is working correctly -there was an attempt to make the sound system better by the previous owner but it was just inducing noise all the time, ripped out the amp and filters in the back, no music for now -trunk antenna goes up as long as the radio is on regardless of the mode, I want it to only rise if I choose Radio specifically or per switch -3rd brake light is a bit dimmer than the taillights but everything was converted to LEDs so mabye now it just seems dimmer? -reverse light flickers, have to test if that behavior changes when I fiddle with the gear stick. Hope I can get around changing the switch. -Left side taillight, blinker section has minor water intake and is humid after washing. Other side has a hole in it, probably for that exact reason. I'll probably reseal them entirely and plug the holes. Engine: -minor coolant drips on one or the other hose -rear turbo leaks oil onto the exhaust making the car essentially undriveable due to fire hazard -Oil filter relocation kit has an oil drip at the Dash lines, will probably make a new connection there and tighten real good and pray -throttle body assembly is slightly stuck for the first throttle pedal input after sitting for a while I'm always open to suggestions and advice from more experienced people, I'm sure half of this list is easily dealt with and just requires some time and effort to sort out properly. Once I have some proper pictures of the car I will post some in this thread, I just have to remember to take some more once I get the chance to. Will post updates when I have news on anything, I want to try to keep this thread as kind of a logbook as well. Ultimately my goal for this car is to just enjoy it. An engine rebuild is probably going to happen sometime as well, because it is old after all. It will never be fully new again, I am just not that rich. But I want it to look good, work well and not rot away while I drive it. I'm probably gonna spend a lot of money on this journey, hopefully not an unreasonable amount.
    • Hi all. So one of my major issues at the moment is my rear turbo leaking oil on the exhaust (and the general area). I presumed it was the rock hard super old drain hose, which it was not. So now I am in the midst of removing the rear turbo to get access to the banjo bolt that goes into the turbo oil feed. As one of the previous owners accidentally? tore off the OEM oil feed hardline that reaches behind the turbo, they ran braided lines directly to the turbo, presumably PTFE. Now, regardless if the line has rubber or teflon inside, is it just generally a bad idea to do this? I imagine these lines get quite hot being between the engine, turbo core and exhaust manifold. I suppose it's not too far fetched to think the line may even have melted. I'd love to hear your opinions on this as as the replacement OEM hardline piece is 130 per unit. And cutting open the currently mounted line to see inside will mean I just have to get a replacement either way. So far I am hoping maybe the bolt just loosened or (god forbid) they forgot one of the crush washers.
×
×
  • Create New...