Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think the ruling was that Skaifes door was ok at first, but then after the safety car, due to the extra congestion, vehicles in close proximity it became a safety concern.

Doesnt make sense really as after 30sec of racing under green the only car he would have overtaken would have been Murphys, which i dont think he would have caught even if he wasnt black flagged.

Makes me want to sell the Skyline and start saloon car racing, emulate Doughboy in a VN (Are you reading this?)

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest RedLineGTR

i rekon as soon as the door had the problem they should of made him go in....not wait like 4 laps before they decided while the safety car was out..because they thought it might hit some of the other cars etc etc...and other teams were bitching about it..

Bowe is a winger, Skaifes passing move was perfectly fine as was S. Richards. from what I saw JB saw he was being passed and tryed to suddenly close the door but far too late. He bitches and moans about other drivers causing inccidents but I think he should work on his own driving first.

All credit to Murph and kelly they did a fantastic job would have been a really good fight to the finsh with skaife if they hadnt pulled him in, which if they were going to do it should have been done right away instead of near the end.

Disappointing weekend from SBR, I'm a holden fan but I still like to see a good contest. Jimmy and steven's duel for 4th near the end was great! as was Larry Perkins' drive, he may not have the pace but there is no denying he knows how to make a car wide and fend people off how long was ingall behind him!

Congrats to Shuey on another F1 championship too all in all a great weekend of motorsport.

I dont like Ingall at all, so i loved seeing old LP holding him at bay.

What would make me really happy is Ingall putting the car into the wall over the next few rounds and SBR drop him.

Dont think its that much of a stretch as they dont tolerate poor results, only have to look at Baird, Longhurst, Besnard, Larkham, over past seasons, they have all been chopped at the drop of a hat.

Not likely to happen but as far as recent results go, Ingall makes silly mistake at Sandown, didnt show a lot of confidence in traffic in todays race, is known as a pretty poor qualifier, hasnt come to grips with the Ford as quickly as he expected....

Then they have Mark Winterbottom who with Noske was lapping well and handling the responsibilty/pressure running at the front, and SBR dont know what to do with him next season?

BTW, I totally disagree with the comment about the richards v bowe incident.

JB has *always* been an overly defensive driver, he had been holding up SR for 10 minutes with half an hour of the race to go

If it was the last few laps that would be one thing, but there was ages to go at that time. The rules are quite clear that you can't block, if you do you should be shown the blue flag, if you ignore it 3 times, black flag. The flaggies need to be encouraged to use the blue flag for more than just leaders lapping traffic.

Blocking is the scrounge of racing worldwide - most categories are close enough that it only takes a little blocking to ruin the whole race

/rant

The thing with skaife was that they were aware that there was a problem with the door and if it was going to be a problem with traffic they should have said something as soon as the saftey car was going out not a few laps later, i dont think its the last we will hear of the incident either.

Roy, you make some good points RE: SBR not tolerating substandard perfromances and the brilliance that Winterbottom displayed all year and at Bathurst. I reckon they may run a 3rd car in 2004 if they can get $$ and an extra spot from TEGA.

However, Russell hasnt exactly been disappointing this year (he's running 3rd in Championship) + the Stones have outlayed big $$ to have him. Just like Lowndes, Ingall will be staying put and will more than likely finish his career at Ford (and SBR).

Add W.Gardner to your list of rejected SBR drivers too... hehe.

Wasnt old Waynes fault though... hell the regulatoins have been changed because of his accident last year.

Winterbottom went well, but there were times where he looked a little ragged, but christ he did a sensational job. That ragged thing could be said about Lowndes in his first bathurst when he overtook Bowe on the outside at the end of mountain straight.

As for Ingall being 3rd in the chamionship, well he has been towed along by Ambrose for some of those points/results at Sandown and Bathurst. I think you will find with the exception of QLD Raceway where he was given the lead from Ambrose most of his results have struggled to keep pace with Ambroses with 4 or 5 finishes in 8th thru 13th.

But i suppose that can be said for many teamates.

I think you will find that it was Ford that paid all the money for Ingall, Not SBR.

So it is possible Ford could throw him in another Ford franchise like they did with Lowndes. Forbes Racing is a franchise that SBR/Ford could easily pick up for another of their drivers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know if you can disassemble the thing and put it backwards for different ramp rates. They're both "2 ways" or both "1.5 ways" because well, 2 ways and 1.5 ways are the same 'thing' I do not know for sure, but I believe the 38420-RSS15-B5 is the 1 way, and 38420-RSS20-B5 is the two way. In other words, I predict Nissan considers this: to be a 1.5 way. No idea what actually happens when it arrives/you disassemble it. It would be an excellent question to ask Nismo directly! I somehow doubt you will get an answer though, I feel you would be the first person to document what you encounter when you open the box and the internet would be grateful.
    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...