Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

nah i dont have any problem with that

its the damn gay ass telstra tool bar with uptodate usage meter...its not up to date all the time! and doesnt dispense gold out of my computer! what the hell?!?!?!

hehe

when did u go get dyno? (cant reply going bed now)

you loose approx 9 kw from the auto box.

My Dyno result was a 203 rwkw on 13psi.

But i have the following.

Fuel pump

T04e/gts-r exhaust manifold

ARC front mount

3" zorst

and i think a slight possibility of a modded diff/gearbox (but i have no idea on that one)

Looking at your graph that's a very typical shape.

I've seen that shape out of a number of cars with similar mods.

BUT at the end of the day, all you use it for is to compare the next time you do more mods, on compare as a group on a dyno day.

If you do another mod (say a cooler) and get it re-tuned then you compare that with your previous figure/graph and go from there. Just because you made 127rwkw means nothing.

It has nothing to do with 'whos' dyno is more accurate, or reads higher.

As long as you use it for a base of comparison and use that dyno consistently. Chopping and changing dyno's doesnt help as figures and readings will vary

hope that clarifies.

ash

hey guys, i was wondering would this have anything got to do with the AFM? haven't checked if they are clean etc.. oh almost forgot , also have K&N Panel filter.. car just done 86,000km , close to change timing belt and fuel pump. Would this help increase some rwkw?

Thanks for all your feedbacks ppl. Much appreciated... :)

If its auto it explains the 10-20rwkw loss. Depends on the condition of the auto as well, if its slightly shagged it'll slip a little under high revs..

Anyhow, who cares about dyno figures.. as long as the car feels harder and runs a good 1/4 mile time then i wouldn't worry too much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...