Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey All,

I have finally bothered to try and install my GReddy Breather Tank (for those people that reckon it's not needed, that is irrelevant to this post as I want to install what I already have bought) :/

As usual all instructions are in Jap. So I did a bit of searching and came up with the English translation of the connection diagram on the back of the packaging:

BreatherTank.jpg

Now every connection makes sense except one. The one the needs a feed from the top of the head.

I know on the RB26 there is a "Cooling System Air Drain Plug". It is just a screw fitting. This is normally used to help air escape when you are performing a full coolant flush/refill. I think it is part of a vacuum chamber which feeds to the fuel pressure regulator.

So my question is where do I connect the "hot" water feed required from the head?

Has anybody on SAU have a Breather tank installed in their RB26? Pictures of your setup would be nice. 

Any help is appreciated (saves me $$$ getting a mechanic to do it)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/267079-greddy-breather-tank/
Share on other sites

Lot of expense for nothing

380rwkw circuit/targa cars car run a stock setup... if its good enough for them.. well...

Have you ever seen one of these in action? Great for bleeding the coolant system the rest of it's functionality does not bother me either way.

Im thinking people are over the "My way or the highway attitude", there is more than one way to skin a cat, no pun intended Trent :/

i'm installing one of these now on my 25. I'm sorta with nismoid when it comes to standard engines. (not standard power wise, as in stock plenum, T/B, radiator etc.

I have altered my coolant system by fitting a forward facing plenum, and not running coolant thru the T/B. the highest point has changed and i no longer have the factory coolant bleeder. so i'm running a line from the old bleeder point nibble on the plunum (factory runners and flange) and one from the bottom radiator hose and I have a swirl pot here I may put in the top radiator hose and might run a line from that also.

as for expense, you can pick up D1 or M spec breather tanks for a around 100 bux. a coolant line fitting a nipple go for round 30 bux and then its some silicone line. not too much expense really.

Have you ever seen one of these in action? Great for bleeding the coolant system the rest of it's functionality does not bother me either way.

Im thinking people are over the "My way or the highway attitude", there is more than one way to skin a cat, no pun intended Trent :)

You already get one from the factory...

Yes i've seen them in action, a much better setup than the greddy as well, still doesn't mean you need one :)

You already get one from the factory...

Yes i've seen them in action, a much better setup than the greddy as well, still doesn't mean you need one :)

yes the greddy and D1 systems are extremeley simple but they are effective and like you i dont think modifying the coolant/vacuum rail on the manifold is warranted. What most people need is a simple fix i think the whole setup owes us $100 :)

i can tell you that if you fit a forward facing plenum it is a must. It was also mandatory on our car as we run only two coolant hoses on the whole engine upper and lower rad hoses and bleeding the system was nearly impossible (rad is quite low too).

(Fit a clear hose to your engine and watch it on the dyno) you will be suprised after some heavy work the shortcommings of the std setup.

Edited by URAS
yes the greddy and D1 systems are extremeley simple but they are effective and like you i dont think modifying the coolant/vacuum rail on the manifold is warranted. What most people need is a simple fix i think the whole setup owes us $100 :P

i can tell you that if you fit a forward facing plenum it is a must. It was also mandatory on our car as we run only two coolant hoses on the whole engine upper and lower rad hoses and bleeding the system was nearly impossible (rad is quite low too).

(Fit a clear hose to your engine and watch it on the dyno) you will be suprised after some heavy work the shortcommings of the std setup.

um wut? :w00t:

i was strongly advised against using one from my mechanic and tuner. if u have a radiator in the stock position why use one. its aimed at v mount setups that dont use header tanks...or so i was told.

ps i run a forward facing plenum, dont use one and im fine :P

um wut? :thumbsup:

i was strongly advised against using one from my mechanic and tuner. if u have a radiator in the stock position why use one. its aimed at v mount setups that dont use header tanks...or so i was told.

ps i run a forward facing plenum, dont use one and im fine :laugh:

probably as your tuner does not know what it does....... if you read the second part of my post and carry out the simple test you will soon see why rb25's with forward facing plenums benefit from a swirlpot.

I completely agree with URAS...its not necessary but it is beneficial as it is easier to bleed and will stop you having unwanted air in system.

It works like a header tank does on alot of cars these days...eg mazdas, most saabs, etc. These cars do not have bleed screws to get rid of the air. I personally think it is a good design and am keen to set one up on my RB20.

Has anyone done a breather tank on an RB20 and have pics of their setup? Sorry for hijacking the thread a bit. Just keen to see how people have done it.

I was thinking to run mine off the coolant lines that go to the throttle body or tap a nipple into the bleed screw hole on plenum.

Installed this Afternoon (car wasn't started yet when photo was taken so thats why there is not much coolant in the lines).

IMG_0031.jpg

From the picture, the bleeder tank is too low.

Your bleeder tank coolant level needs to be higher and above the head bleeding point for it to be effective.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...