Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, recently just had an accident and my front unpainted front jun style kit is smashed:(

Any one out there have a spare Jun style or Any nice looking front bumper for for sale? For skyline R33

I've been looking around but not in luck with it :D , Much appreciate the help guys :wub:

Post the pictures on here with price and postage prices.

cheers. ;)

post-51548-1241260146_thumb.jpg

Edited by sxc_skylinee
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268116-need-a-new-aftermarket-front-bumper/
Share on other sites

Veilside looks good...you should put 1 of those on

+1

dezz is a respected member of SAU with almost 30k posts

i think he knows what his talking about

veilside FTMFW my mates got a veilside bar and the amount of chicks who compliment his car is unreal

ahhaha on the Banana Bar :P

I Almost got the whole set of veilside kit but i just lost interest in them, not sure why. i think because they stick out too much on the edges that kinda turned me off :down: lol.

But Jun style is niceeeeee :D not to out there and looks awesome :cool: . + the chicks will digg the sound of the car then the looks unless they like rice burners lmao!

I bought my Jun style kit from ebay aswell it was a bitch to fit on but i did it :happy: , but had an accident recently and yea the front smashed! so i just need the front bumper.

i do check ebay occasionally, but no 1 is selling them yet. i will check out PSI parts cheers :D

+1

dezz is a respected member of SAU with almost 30k posts

i think he knows what his talking about

veilside FTMFW my mates got a veilside bar and the amount of chicks who compliment his car is unreal

respect from 30,000 posts - lol

veilside blows, looks like balls.

as for pulling the chicks lol - its a skyline its not that great.

am i the only one seeing a r35 in the pic added ?

lol, yes i saw it while i was filling up at springvale BP, spoke to the guy and he worked at nissan dealer and thought to take the car out for a weekend drive lol. sat inside fairly roomy and feels like a ferrari style.

got pics of me in it :P haha

Just go to www.jetspeed.com.au , a bit pricey but you'll get the look you want.

thanks bro, i saw they dont have jun but what do u reckon of the 400r type? i've already got the side and back from jun style and if i mix it with 400r, would it look good? :P

ebay has some more kits up now :yucky:, hard choices here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...