Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

DO NOT put those on a skyline!

not even a holden deserves that sort of punishment!

Funnily enough we have someone at work who fitted Paranormal 18# to his commodore. and yes he is a gigantic fag.

They really do scream "no style" like turning up to a black tie function and dragging your arse across the carpet like a dog with worms.

brilliant choice mate, I really wanted those but didn't want to wait...stupid me

This picture is before spacer and 4wd spec, same size and offset = same fit. I got 2 sets of spacers for front and rear but they weren't on yet

img0008m.jpg

I then got the rear guards rolled and the fronts knocked up a bit and lowered on coilovers.

Rears are pretty much perfect, can barely fit a finger in there but I need to get some camber arms because there is a lot of camber

Unfortunately there was barely any camber on the front and I couldn't keep the spacers on as it was scrubbing. Theses photos have no spacers on the front

snc00032.jpg

background2j.jpg

what do you guys recon of these rims? im in the same boat i need sum nice light jap rims that look good for my silver r33 series 2, ive looked through so many pics of silver gtst's and this is the only one thats stuck out, just wanna second opinion from the fellow skyliners :)

2njf2ie.jpg

They really do scream "no style" like turning up to a black tie function and dragging your arse across the carpet like a dog with worms.

mate, ive already apologised, how was i supposed to know the punch was alcoholic?

brilliant choice mate, I really wanted those but didn't want to wait...stupid me

This picture is before spacer and 4wd spec, same size and offset = same fit. I got 2 sets of spacers for front and rear but they weren't on yet

img0008m.jpg

I then got the rear guards rolled and the fronts knocked up a bit and lowered on coilovers.

Rears are pretty much perfect, can barely fit a finger in there but I need to get some camber arms because there is a lot of camber

Unfortunately there was barely any camber on the front and I couldn't keep the spacers on as it was scrubbing. Theses photos have no spacers on the front

snc00032.jpg

background2j.jpg

Man i love the way that looks especially over the rears,

what do you guys recon of these rims? im in the same boat i need sum nice light jap rims that look good for my silver r33 series 2, ive looked through so many pics of silver gtst's and this is the only one thats stuck out, just wanna second opinion from the fellow skyliners :)

2njf2ie.jpg

yer man thats looks sweet to simple but tough i reckon

the problem with gtsts is they aint wide enoguh. and people who say te37 are just fooling themselves....you need good decent offset.

something liek ce28ns are a good choice. i just ordered myself some SSR professors Sp1s.....running samething like 19x11 +5.

you get something like this

IMG_3244.jpg

IMG_3250.jpg

IMG_3247.jpg

my advice....if your keeping your fenders standard....get ce28ns....anything that avoids dish....or progressive spokes....cuz they just look stupid

its no r33 i know but u get an idea of wat is hot

Edited by Jap_Muscle

you CAN fit te37's with good offset on a gtst, you just have to work the guards a bit.... not a widebody kit, just a roll/flare and its done

easy 18x10 +12 fit... and with te's you really dont need any more dish than that

ive got volk racing SE37 rims on my gtst, 18x9.5 rear ad 18x8.5 front, running 235 wide rubber front and rear, i cant remember exactly what offset but there pretty much inline with the rear gaurds (ithink +32 offset?)

im thinkin of putting sum 15mm spacers on the rear to pump them out abit and continue running streched 235 tyres

car is lowered already but it aint that low

gotta get sum pics up soon....love that phat wide look

the problem with gtsts is they aint wide enoguh. and people who say te37 are just fooling themselves....you need good decent offset.

something liek ce28ns are a good choice. i just ordered myself some SSR professors Sp1s.....running samething like 19x11 +5.

you get something like this

IMG_3244.jpg

IMG_3250.jpg

IMG_3247.jpg

my advice....if your keeping your fenders standard....get ce28ns....anything that avoids dish....or progressive spokes....cuz they just look stupid

its no r33 i know but u get an idea of wat is hot

Oh my Gawd

you CAN fit te37's with good offset on a gtst, you just have to work the guards a bit.... not a widebody kit, just a roll/flare and its done

easy 18x10 +12 fit... and with te's you really dont need any more dish than that

I wouldn't say 'easy' but I'd say it can be done...

My 18x9.5+22's stuck out a fair bit, but I guess if you wanna stretch some tires on the 10"+12's you could get it happening ..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...