Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heya Guys.

im taking my car to the drags tomorrow night.

it has 217kw at all four wheels with 450 nm of torgue.

do u guys have an idea of what time id get ??

or whats the best tyre pressure psi on standard rims tyres 245/45/17's that are slightly bold lol :)

and would like to know. your power and times u have ran.

cheers Chris.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268529-quater-mile-time/
Share on other sites

Depends on a few things.

How well your reaction time is?

Who gave you your Dyno sheet and was it accurate?

Who tuned your car?

Will it be wet or dry?

How good is your clutch?

I will though take a guess.

You will be in the high 12's.

Depends on a few things.

How well your reaction time is?

Who gave you your Dyno sheet and was it accurate?

Who tuned your car?

Will it be wet or dry?

How good is your clutch?

I will though take a guess.

You will be in the high 12's.

ahh sweet. thanks for the reply.. ill let you know what i run tomorrow lol ( hopefully it is dry )

It's a little more complicated than "x" Power = "y" Time

you need to take into account suspension tune, driveline, how good you are between gears, all that stuff comes into account too.

That's why you haven't been inundated with figures.

Stock R33 GTR sould do about 13.7 secs, with 206 kW's.

(Nissan claim 206 kW's).

You with 217 kW's, you should do better then 13.7 secs.

Depending on how good your launch + (clutch, tyres, suspension + all your mods) and reaction time is, I would say high 12's.

14.9@98MPH

217KW WAS AT A FOUR WHEELS....He should get high 13's with that.

206KW From Factory is at the fly-wheel.....AT FOUR WHEELS is like 170KW....this is why a stock GTR does 13.5 seconds.

Got Boost and REV210...........really guys a holden does those times....

Chris....you are a laugh too.

217KW WAS AT A FOUR WHEELS....He should get high 13's with that.

206KW From Factory is at the fly-wheel.....AT FOUR WHEELS is like 170KW....this is why a stock GTR does 13.5 seconds.

Got Boost and REV210...........really guys a holden does those times....

Chris....you are a laugh too.

yeah but, he hasn't run his car yet.

So until he does, he gets the appropriate response for a 'gonna'

14.9@98MPH

They would be alot meaner to him in the motorsport section :starwars:

217KW WAS AT A FOUR WHEELS....He should get high 13's with that.

206KW From Factory is at the fly-wheel.....AT FOUR WHEELS is like 170KW....this is why a stock GTR does 13.5 seconds.

Got Boost and REV210...........really guys a holden does those times....

Chris....you are a laugh too.

haha. nah man i know what time gtr's run stock. mine was 166.7kw at all four wheels stock. now its 217 at all four wheels right.

stock standard with the full light wieght asian drivers.. iv seen em hit low 13's and a 12.9 .

but mine has heavy duty clutch ( gonna launch ride the clutch kinda launch so i dont bog down ) at about 4000 rpm

and hills motorsport tuned and dyno'd my car.

so yeh. unfortunetly i couldnt race. but i will be racing this wensday. so ill let yous know then

i know im an average drive ( 19 yr old.. bla blah too young ) ... but im hoping for low 13's high 12's

as im only launching at 4000 rpm

Depends on a few things.

How well your reaction time is?

Who gave you your Dyno sheet and was it accurate?

Who tuned your car?

Will it be wet or dry?

How good is your clutch?

I will though take a guess.

You will be in the high 12's.

His reaction time has absolutely nothing to do with his quarter mile time...

The person that tuned the car has nothing to do with what quarter mile it'll do...

He won't be racing if it's wet...obviously...

If the dyno is accurate and isn't reading high and you do in fact have 217kw at the wheels, my guess, in a 33 GTR (if you can drive) would be a mid 12 at around 110mph.

For reference purposes, and this isn't the best reference...in a calais turbo auto with exactly 200kw at the wheels I did a 12.69@110mph. You should get a better 60 ft that that ever would've, effectively lowering your ET, and with a little more power, pull better mph. I'm just trying to factor in a little extra weight the 33 would be carrying, but yeah...anyway good luck.

His reaction time has absolutely nothing to do with his quarter mile time...

The person that tuned the car has nothing to do with what quarter mile it'll do...

He won't be racing if it's wet...obviously...

If the dyno is accurate and isn't reading high and you do in fact have 217kw at the wheels, my guess, in a 33 GTR (if you can drive) would be a mid 12 at around 110mph.

For reference purposes, and this isn't the best reference...in a calais turbo auto with exactly 200kw at the wheels I did a 12.69@110mph. You should get a better 60 ft that that ever would've, effectively lowering your ET, and with a little more power, pull better mph. I'm just trying to factor in a little extra weight the 33 would be carrying, but yeah...anyway good luck.

well said mate.. thank you very much

ill be sure to let yous all know soon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...