Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking to finally get rid of my tein coilovers and go for the more street friendly setup that Sydney kid used to recommend/supply before he disappeared off these forums.

Only problem is i don't know the specifics of what his setup was.

From memory it was:

6/4 (f/b) whiteline springs with bilstein shocks

whiteline sway bars

Can any1 confirm the spring rates and/or provide any part numbers for any of the parts above.

Also would be keen on a workshop/shop that can supply these parts at reasonable prices that anyone can recommend.

Thanks guys

Edited by Taso84

yeah i did some research into this already, and with sloazr33's help, i came up with these part numbers.

The springs he used were whiteline. I think the fronts were 4kg and the rears were ~3kg

Part numbers:

Front: Spring-coil Lowering Kit WSL - Control - 73175

Rear: Spring-coil Lowering Kit WSL - Control - 83139

The shocks are Bilstein B6 Sport

Part Numbers:

Front: #F4-B46-1873-H0

Rear: #F4-B46-1916-H0

SK's shocks had extra circlip grooves (for height adjustment) machined into the shock body. They dont come standard off the shelf with these, but you can request this from your supplier.

Also, i've been told that King Springs in a similar rate, are a better alternative.

Contact Daniel at Elite Racing. He does this exact package with the king springs.

Thanks mate, that really helpfull. I'm assuming that these part numbers were for the 33 gtst, shouldv'e mentioned that in my fist post.

Also what the diff b/w kings and whiteline springs? I was sort of leaning towards getting eibachs instead of whitelines but not sure now

yeah thats for R33. i just assumed lol.

the kings have progressive rates front and rear. I think the whitelines are only progressive rears.

Eibach would also be a good choice, but you need to be careful with matching the spring rate to the damper.

So if you stay with approx the same spring rate it should be ok.

well ideally, you leave the circlips in the standard position. (350mm centre of wheel to guard)

if you drop the height, you shorten the stroke of the shock, and you're stuffing up the whole setup. ive been warned and triple warned about this, and that's why i cant commit to using this setup.

ive tried to convince myself, but 350mm is too high. lol

anyway, i'm not an expert, so ask daniel from elite racing. he will send you a very detailed reply.

edit:

actually, i'd like to see pics of some cars that are using SK's or Elite Racing's bilstein set up to see just how high or low it looks.

caaaarn guys. shows us ur bilsteins :D

Edited by Munkyb0y

is that 325mm all around? and i know these arent bilsteins. you have the greddy type s coilovers in there.

whats the standard ride height, front and rear? anyone know?

i think i read somewhere 375mm, but not sure if thats only front.

i just picked up a set of tein super streets, and wondering how low they can go on the 33.

btw joeyjoejoeyoufknbastardilovethelookofyourcar :P

Edited by Munkyb0y

350mm on the back is perfect for me but i'd prefer around 360mm on the front to save my front bar from scraping on gutters.

So this SK setup comes with 350m (centre wheel to guard) for the front and back?

Also, i know Sydney Kid mentioned that his setup was hard enough for all tracks except maybe Phillips Island, but 4/3 seems abit to soft for track. What do u guys think?

Monkeyboy, i gather that you didnt end up getting SK's pack and went for the tein SS. Was there any reason for this other than the height that you didnt like?

350mm on the back is perfect for me but i'd prefer around 360mm on the front to save my front bar from scraping on gutters.

So this SK setup comes with 350m (centre wheel to guard) for the front and back?

Also, i know Sydney Kid mentioned that his setup was hard enough for all tracks except maybe Phillips Island, but 4/3 seems abit to soft for track. What do u guys think?

Monkeyboy, i gather that you didnt end up getting SK's pack and went for the tein SS. Was there any reason for this other than the height that you didnt like?

i run similar rates in the stag, i think they would be fine in a GTST, aslong as you have swaybars.

It's hard enough for track work if you are using street tyres and big sway bars.

semi slicks like a stiffer spring, around the 6/5 mark, or you can run a higher spring rate again with stock sway bars. There are a few ways to achieve a similar result. Each has it's own merits and short comings.

As has been mentioned already, the main failing with this set up is the stroke of the shock. The soft spring rate doesn't help in that regard so you can end up smashing your bump stops in certain situations where stiff sway bars don't contribute.

whats the standard ride height, front and rear? anyone know? (R33)

i think i read somewhere 375mm, but not sure if thats only front.

i just picked up a set of tein super streets, and wondering how low they can go on the 33.

someone answer Munkyb0y's question.....

yeah...someone answer him

Edited by Munkyb0y
Monkeyboy, i gather that you didnt end up getting SK's pack and went for the tein SS. Was there any reason for this other than the height that you didnt like?

well i got them for a good price vs the bilsteins which seem kind of pricey + the adjustability, and ive heard so many good reports on them.

i run 325mm and even that could be a little lower, visually speaking ofcourse....

DSC00070.jpg

so add an inch to that basically

that looks hot , but maybe drop the back another 10mm and will be fine :)

i agree that 350mm is to high

well i got them for a good price vs the bilsteins which seem kind of pricey + the adjustability, and ive heard so many good reports on them.

Have you put them in yet? What spring rates did you get and how are they?

Also what was the price differential b/w the two setups?

i bought the teins second hand, so its not a viable price comparison in my case.

but the bilsteins with king spring, or whiteline springs will set you back at least $1500 or so, depending what kind of deal you can get. thats about the cheapest i could get them (WITH circlip adjustment).

i think the teins sell for about $2100 delivered from Nengun .

I havent installed them yet. Waiting on some c spanners. They come with a 4kg spring rate front and rear i believe. Ive also heard 5kg front, 4kg rear. But either way, its not a heavy spring.

And from all accounts, they provide a very comfortable ride at soft damper setting, that can be turned up to quite stiff if you require. 16 level damper adjust.

Edited by Munkyb0y
someone answer Munkyb0y's question.....

yeah...someone answer him

I think this was from SK R33 GB thread

"Standard (new) height is 380 mm front and 370 mm rear"

For the OP:

Definitely get a front swaybar

BNF24Z whiteline Swaybar 24mm-h/duty Blade adjustable

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...