Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

GT-Rs are perhaps best described as "intelligent" 4WD.

Subarus, Lancers, and the like are basically FWD that also feed (constant) drive to the rear wheels.

GT-Rs on the other hand are RWD, and feed some drive to the front wheels when the system detects a need to do so. Not simply when (rear) wheel slip is detected, but also when cornering forces indicate a need for some FWD.

The GTR and GTS4 4WD system is unique to Nissan. There is no centre diff as in most other 4WD systems.

The way it works is that it behaves like a normal RWD most of the time, and under certain conditions, there is a clutch that will feed torque to the front wheels.

I believe the computer that controls the 4WD clutch looks at throttle position, as well as lateral and longitudinal accelerometers, and relative front/rear wheel speeds, and decides how much torque to feed to the front wheels.

It combines awsome straight line traction, but has none of the corner entry understeer of a full time 4WD. It is a very good highly developed system far better than full time 4WD.

Full time 4WD is probably better in mud, dirt, or snow, but the GTR system is more suited to driving on wet or dry sealed roads. It was made to win races, not drive around paddocks.

Hi SIR33, Warspeed covered it pretty well. I would only add that a GTR can have 100% torque to the rear wheels, whereas a front wheel drive based all wheel drive (Sub, Mitsi, VW, Audi etc) can only ever have a maximum of 40% of the engine's torque available to the rear wheels.

Since acceleration and cornering weight transfer is to the rear or diagonal, a GTR will always have higher traction capacity regardless of the suspension set up.

The Evo V111 (some 14 years after the R32 GTR) is the only car that even comes close. Notice "close" not "as good".

Hope that adds to the previous posts

This probably explains why alot of PRO-GTR drag racers are having a hard time getting the right setup with the correct torque split for the 4WD. There are plenty of GTST RWD's running quicker times than their GTR equivalents. This is something that HKS struggle with on their car too, apparently. Because all of those drag RWD suspension and tyre setups go out the window as soon as you try to do it on a 4WD.

Hi Zensoku, a lot of the fast GTST's run drag slicks, whereas a lot of the fast GTR's run street legal radials. There is a huge difference in traction and launch torque handling capacity between a proper drag slick and a radial.

Then there is the weight factor, it takes a lot of extra power to overcome a 250 kg weight handicap.

Hope that adds to the thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok guys thank you very much. GCG highflow it is then 🙂 
    • forgot to mention that when it does this it does not kill the engine, but I have not kept the pedal down long enough to let it, as I see no reason to beat up on it as its got to be something simple, small and dumb causing this.  And as soon as I let off pedal, the engine returns to its normal super smooth operation and rpms re-stabilize quickly, once below 4k. 
    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
×
×
  • Create New...