Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've just ordered a GT3076r for an RB25/30

Comp 0.6A/R

Trim 56

Turbine 0.82A/R

Recently been advised this configuation isn't available, only with a 0.86 A/R rear.

Who makes the 0.86 ?

If I strictly want the 0.82 rear then trim has to be 52 and Comp cover either 0.5 or 0.7 A/R.

Can anyone please confirm these specs are correct.

Cheers.

Edited by conan7772
  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Strange.

Horse power in a box don't do the 0.6 comp with 0.82 rear in 56 trim.

Check out the turbo charts.

Another US distibutor was the same.

Can't seem to get the genuine Garrett package anywhere.

Maybe due to back log ?

ANyone know ?

Cheers.

were you trying to get the rear housing to have a skyline dump pipe pattern on it? if so then that may be the reason as garret housings aren't compatiable with the skyline dump pipe. if you weren't and just getting the garret housing, then it sounds a bit odd.

actually, was just looking and the person may have gotten it confused with a 3071r as the 3071r comes in a 0.5 AR compressor with a 0.86 rear

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_700382_20.htm

Adelaide turbo services - GT3076

rear AVO .73 skyline 6bolt housing

front ported Nissan 45V4 compressor housing 60-Trim

centre Garrett bb CHRA 700177-3

very very very NICE

auto, stock injectors, 240rwkw

:)

Ive had headwork and got tomei cams/springs

starts boost 2400 rpm

full boost by 3500 - 3800 rpm depending on conditions (road/gear/standing-start or cruising-punch)

very responsive. 180kmph overdrive gear @ 3200rpm with steady full boost, pulling

full boost of 1.05bar (15psi) before 4000 rpm, and just pulls hard onwards holding boost the whole way (profec-b).

rated for 280rwkw

with S15 480cc injector upgrade and a re-remap of my ecu would net me 260rwkw+

240kw is fine for the moment, but eventually will do this ^ :)

and wind up for a 18psi tune (1.25bar)

Had the gt3076r with 0.7 rear housing (Had the id tag 3037) So that core with the Garrett Gt30 anti surge front housing and AVO rear housing to suit rb25det.

Couldnt push more then 250rwkw on 20psi without major det, dont think that rear housing is any good, id stick with the garrett one or got for an hks gt3037 pro s

Had the gt3076r with 0.7 rear housing (Had the id tag 3037) So that core with the Garrett Gt30 anti surge front housing and AVO rear housing to suit rb25det.

Couldnt push more then 250rwkw on 20psi without major det, dont think that rear housing is any good, id stick with the garrett one or got for an hks gt3037 pro s

cheers for the info Dynamite

ATS rates their version at 280rwkw, and frankly Im real happy with 240kw atm, seeing its auto & stock injectors.

I would hope for above 250kw tho if/when I upgrade the injectors/ecu-remap/1.3bar boost tune...... seeing Ive got a strong freshly worked head, etc.

With bottom end work (forgies,gtr rods,bearings) Id hit 270rwkw at 20psi Im sure. But then Id need to see Mike at MV Automatics again :)

Comes down to who built/balanced the turbo, and If you've got a strong engine. And the gearbox.

This current 240kw tune has no detonation, whereas a previous tune of 190kw with the ex- slide highflow had an 'ol rattle & shake'...

No worries, mine was from horsepower in a box, rated at 300rwkw

I made 210rwkw on the stock series 2 turbo then upgraded

nismo 555cc injectors, z32 afm, gt3076r with avo rear housing, bosch 044,and only made 250rwkw...

Felt like i was the ginnie pig testing this turbo....

Now i wouldnt touch any GCG or AVO or hi flow for that matter

Only genuine Garrett or Hks

Edited by DYNAMITE
were you trying to get the rear housing to have a skyline dump pipe pattern on it? if so then that may be the reason as garret housings aren't compatiable with the skyline dump pipe. if you weren't and just getting the garret housing, then it sounds a bit odd.

actually, was just looking and the person may have gotten it confused with a 3071r as the 3071r comes in a 0.5 AR compressor with a 0.86 rear

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_700382_20.htm

No, I'll need a new dump pipe anyway.

I just strictly want the genuine Garrett turbine WITHOUT any machining and/or cropping merely to merit a re-badge.

As far as I can see, HKS are the only ones worthy of this, but hey you gotta pay for it.

Anyway, most of the custom rears were designed for 4 cylinder aps, trying to find good middle ground.

My setup is the RB25/30 pushing 284rwkw with a high-flow (now blown), 256 poncams, 555 cc injectors, Haltech s2000, plazmaman 70mm TB and custom fuel rail.

From all the threads I've read, consistent problems arise with custom modified hot sides on the six cylinders.

Boost creep, boost spike, boost drop, unmatched flow etc.

Most distributors are now supplying the 0.70 AR comp with the GT3076R according to their charts except GCG.

I know there's currently a huge demand and back order on these popular models.

I'm assuming some suppliers put together their own configs just to keep sales going out the door. I may be wrong.

Anyway, I'm staying with what the threads have illustrated, Garrett unmodified turbine.

0.70 comp might be better with the RB30 and cams.

Should get over 330 rwkw.

But I'd still prefer the 0.60 for me, after the high flow at full boost at 2800 rpm, and 974 Nm of torque, that's power on demand!

were you trying to get the rear housing to have a skyline dump pipe pattern on it? if so then that may be the reason as garret housings aren't compatiable with the skyline dump pipe. if you weren't and just getting the garret housing, then it sounds a bit odd.

actually, was just looking and the person may have gotten it confused with a 3071r as the 3071r comes in a 0.5 AR compressor with a 0.86 rear

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_700382_20.htm

Yeah you're right, and the 0.86 has a 3.5mm smaller turbine wheel.

Might be a bad flow match for the 76mm comp wheel.

This is where I'm afraid because of the back orders, suppliers are selling whatever they can to keep sales up whilst the next containers arrive. Maybe...

I have been tring to track down one of these 700382-12 Gt3076 for the last 3 days. Everyone is saying there is no stock of the rear.82 5 bolt IW housings.

Some have said there should be in the next 3-4 weeks, others have said some time in August

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...