Jump to content
SAU Community

Cool Fuel In F1 ?


Recommended Posts

Hay guys why do the Formula one teams cool the fuel down before it goes into the cars ?

And i was reading that fuel pump is cooled by the fuel passing throught it so would it warm up the fuel ?

Wont this do the opposite to what the formula 1 teams try to do i assume that they cool the fuel down because it makes more power some how which you guys will hopefully

be able to help me with.

The fuel pump warms the fuel up so it makes all the cars less efficent if the fuel is warmer ?

I assume that it makes the the air intake temps lower as it is sprayed into the piston is that what cold fuel dose ?

Edited by cm712
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the rx7's when they raced in the 12 hour used to cool there fuel i think i remember something like 7 degC

ive only seen a couple of cars since that have a icebox for fuel last one was up in darwin i saw last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id say so its more dense thus you can fit more into the tank. Kinda the same as they recommend u fill up in the morning.

Bingo.

More Dense Fuel = More Fuel In tank

Although a lot of the benefit would be wiped out in the engine bay unless you could insulate the fuel lines from heat, keeping the fuel cool means you could fit more into the cylinders too.

More Fuel in Cylinders = Higher Compression = More power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few teams used to use fuel coolers in parc fermé overnight to stop fuel from evaporating out of the tank. This was when they weren't allowed to refuel between the end of qualifying and starting the race.

They'd cycle the fuel out through a chiller and pump it back in. I suppose when races are practically decided by fuel strategy, every last millilitre counts.

Otherwise, I'd opt for the density answer Skyrin3 said. Aside from being able to fit more in the tank, denser fuel means more fuel for a given volume. This means you can move more fuel over a certain length of time. In a competition settled in the thousandths of a second, refuelling a split second faster could also improve placings.

Colder fuel could theoretically increase power by cooling the charge air as it goes in, but I'm not sure if the fuel can really stay cold in the tank. I can't imagine its particularly cool anywhere in a F1 car, and with the refuelling neck behind the driver I can only assume the fuel tank is near the engine.

Edited by scathing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few teams used to use fuel coolers in parc fermé overnight to stop fuel from evaporating out of the tank. This was when they weren't allowed to refuel between the end of qualifying and starting the race.

They'd cycle the fuel out through a chiller and pump it back in. I suppose when races are practically decided by fuel strategy, every last millilitre counts.

Otherwise, I'd opt for the density answer Skyrin3 said. Aside from being able to fit more in the tank, denser fuel means more fuel for a given volume. This means you can move more fuel over a certain length of time. In a competition settled in the thousandths of a second, refuelling a split second faster could also improve placings.

Colder fuel could theoretically increase power by cooling the charge air as it goes in, but I'm not sure if the fuel can really stay cold in the tank. I can't imagine its particularly cool anywhere in a F1 car, and with the refuelling neck behind the driver I can only assume the fuel tank is near the engine.

by regulation in F1, the fuel tank must sit behind the driver, along with the oil tank (they are dry sump)

id love to see someone do some engineering along the lines of cold fuel vs. hot fuel and their effects on power.

i can imagine for turbo cars, colder fuels would decrease the chance of detonation... i.e. adding a 'tank cooler' would have similar effects to adding/having a bigger intercooler, thus allowing you to safely up the boost a little more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the filling up with fuel in the morning thing is a bit of a myth. the tanks are underground so don't get affected by the heat of the day very much (or the cold overnight). in fact during the night they would be heated by the warmth of the ground in the same way that the houses in coober pedy are underground and don't require heating or cooling. also it takes a very large amount of energy to alter the temp of a large body of liquid that isn't getting direct sunlight. the other problem is that if you fill up on a cold morning your tank won't hold quite as much fuel (minutely smaller amount). this is because metal contracts (shrinks) when it is cold and expands when it is hot.

as for cooling the fuel in the lines, that would mean denser fuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

by regulation in F1, the fuel tank must sit behind the driver, along with the oil tank (they are dry sump)

id love to see someone do some engineering along the lines of cold fuel vs. hot fuel and their effects on power.

i can imagine for turbo cars, colder fuels would decrease the chance of detonation... i.e. adding a 'tank cooler' would have similar effects to adding/having a bigger intercooler, thus allowing you to safely up the boost a little more.

I don't see how you're going to get more power from colder fuel?

It means you could "theoretically" run smaller injectors, but if you cool the fuel, and inject for the same amount of time, you've just richened the engine up...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a BBC news article about some fuel cooler scandal back in 2007:

Cooler fuel can give a car a performance advantage.

It is denser, so it can take slightly less time to refuel a car or marginally more fuel can be added in the same time.

Cooler fuel would also give a slight power advantage for about three laps before returning to the temperature out on the track.

However, the total advantage for each car over the race distance was almost certainly no more than a second.

Former F1 team owner Eddie Jordan agrees that cars do gain an unfair advantage if they use cooler fuel.

"If you put chilled or cool fuel into a car you get between 5 and 10 horsepower increase," he told 5live

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I definitely get the low power, sporty car to drive to smash gears but not be doing eleventy million miles an hour! It makes all the normal drives fun!   Rev match tune sounds like the funs! I didn't know the NC had a DBW throttle!   As for me, still have the Skyline, it still has the Barra in it. It's been pushed to the side of the workshop at the moment. Pretty much waiting on me finishing the wiring, and dropping new fuel lines in. Got myself an ACDC Tig end of last year so been teaching myself TIG welding to build a few things for the Skyline. The missus wrote off her GTB liberty at the end of last year, and got it back on salvage rights stupid cheap. It's also still registered, so will mean easier for me to take to the track already done most of the panel damage, just playing "clear the workshop" to make space to pull the motor and box out, fix some oil leaks, replace the clutch, and replace a few minor broken things.  Also got a Lathe at the start of the year, which is adding to the annoyance of no space, which is another reason I'm trying to build things to get more space, to get the Lathe back in a final home for it. It's a BIG lathe, can turn a 355mm diameter, and 1metre between centres... Got it at a steal! So between it and the TIG and old MIG welder, I'll be fabbing some fun little shit up But we've had a lot of shit stuff happening at home, so it's slow going getting things done. But one step at a time!
    • I love Catalunya.  Got a 1:54.632. The AMG is a hoot.
    • I hadn't got that far, my main worry was the connection to the actual calipers themselves. I'm just using new (ish) stock brake lines in the stock setup. I've just had a stud welded to the knuckle that is a little lower than the original stud (so my knuckles have two studs each side) to not have it be stretched so far in previous BBK setups, so the "block" (in the second picture) mounts a little lower for me and I hope I don't need to change anything. I may have even changed the connection to the calipers in the past and have since forgotten I did that. I may not have. Guess how I'm gonna find out. Source: hopium
    • It's more so I'm using the 1x piece line from HEL that goes from the body to the caliper. There's no middle block/mount like the HFM ones or the GKtech ones. There are certain angles/suspension compression where the line actually slightly contacts the ARB. Below of how mine sit (not my photo): How I want it:  
    • Oh I have mine all sitting in boxes ready to go, two sets of rotors, four sets of pads and caliper rebuild kits. They send a survey asking me if I had installed them months ago :p Grinder not necessary to fit the fronts, and not *really* for the rears. They have some good simple videos on how-to. I don't understand brake lines but from what I understand... somehow... OEM lines work, even though people say 350Z and 370Z use different banjo bolts, so it's possible 350'z had some different setup that Nissan changed to the 370Z/R33/R34 system? ....though are a little short, but past-me made a new bolt hole to bolt them to to reach my current fronts so I should be okay... maybe. In any case HFM don't sell any *different* line kits for R33/R34 front brakes than they do for the 370Z kits. So in my mind they must be compatible or they would have different products made to suit the different calipers. Please test and confirm for me kthx.
×
×
  • Create New...