Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Crower/carillo/pauter...if you genuinely want to make big power & still have peace of mind about a rod not exiting the block.

Pauter do custom size rods all the time unlike many other manufacturers.

just wondering peoples chose on conrods for an rb30 set to make 1000hp ?
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/273949-rod-chose/#findComment-4645662
Share on other sites

Based on what?

The worlds most powerfull, quickest and fastest RB30 uses Argo so they must be plenty good enough I'd say.

Not getting involved with whats better or what not but one thing i like about the carrillos when side by side to other rods ive found the equivalent carrillos were consistantly lighter..... the downside is the price :)

Edited by URAS
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/273949-rod-chose/#findComment-4662908
Share on other sites

ive used carrillo's in speedway moters that have done 30 race meets a season and they are throw away after that . they stretch and ya can kiss a motor goodbye if you dont pull ya motor down and measure them from time to time .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/273949-rod-chose/#findComment-4662923
Share on other sites

ive used carrillo's in speedway moters that have done 30 race meets a season and they are throw away after that . they stretch and ya can kiss a motor goodbye if you dont pull ya motor down and measure them from time to time .

which exact model were you using? oh and engine type. We change valve springs on some v8 drag engines every few races and they are the best money can buy everything is relative to application.

Edited by URAS
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/273949-rod-chose/#findComment-4668289
Share on other sites

Do the manufactures provde strength testing charts????? i'm guessing they don't. that would settle all reasoning.

there are plenty of independant test results around, if your really hardcore you could even send them to an AUSTRALIA NATA Accredited Laboratory for Mechanical stress Testing. I did such with a range of rods we bought out the back door of a big manufacturer that supplies a few jap and american brands. We sent the original and a "back door" special for testings to confirm they were indeed the same thing.

This said assembly line produced Scat, K1, Eagle, Brian Crower and a couple of other brands ran the same "assembly line". Some just do the finishing in house.

Carrillo

Pauter

Oliver

Argo etc are in a separate boat to the above 'assy line'.

From Carrillo;

“When considering any connecting rod, the configuration of the beam does not dictate the strength of the connecting rod. Different applications place different

requirements on a rod design, hence also suggesting different beam configurations. Deciding factors on which beam type to use include weight, clearance and actual load conditions in the engine.”

good reading; http://www.faliconcranks.com/Making%20the%20Connection.pdf

Edited by URAS
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/273949-rod-chose/#findComment-4668497
Share on other sites

there are plenty of independant test results around, if your really hardcore you could even send them to an AUSTRALIA NATA Accredited Laboratory for Mechanical stress Testing. I did such with a range of rods we bought out the back door of a big manufacturer that supplies a few jap and american brands. We sent the original and a "back door" special for testings to confirm they were indeed the same thing.

This said assembly line produced Scat, K1, Eagle, Brian Crower and a couple of other brands ran the same "assembly line". Some just do the finishing in house.

Carrillo

Pauter

Oliver

Argo etc are in a separate boat to the above 'assy line'.

From Carrillo;

"When considering any connecting rod, the configuration of the beam does not dictate the strength of the connecting rod. Different applications place different

requirements on a rod design, hence also suggesting different beam configurations. Deciding factors on which beam type to use include weight, clearance and actual load conditions in the engine."

good reading; http://www.faliconcranks.com/Making%20the%20Connection.pdf

Very interesting. if they all published there results it would be clear which ones to buy. Generally i think they will all be of similar metalurgy which is why id be worried about lighter ones.

obviously in terms off higher RPM the thicker the cross section the higher the UTS but then as carrillo mention, other factors such as twisting could cause some issues which is why i think the I/H beam designed rods would be hard to beat???

Edited by GT-RZ
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/273949-rod-chose/#findComment-4672880
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
    • Manual boost controllers (where a little of the boost was bled off) were quite common back in the day, because they were cheap and easy. Generally they had a manual adjustment screw rather than being fixed like yours. Down side is they always bleed boost, not just when you want them to so an electronic boost controller that uses a solenoid will have less lag.
    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
    • Legend. I ended up finding the facebook account of the owner of the first car i sent but sadly he deactivated the account. I think you’re right in saying it’s some sort of well done custom job. Really appreciate your help anyways.
×
×
  • Create New...