Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Heres the story:

I installed a Rb25 into my ceffy, the whole time I was having a missfire issue, after swapping plugs a heap of times, trying different gaps, swapping other ign parts I had the shits and changed to the AU coilpack set up, just for something to do and it was worth a shot.

Fired the car up, let it idle till it warmed up, went for a test drive.

About 2 streets away from my house, driving under light load in a 50kph street, the cabin fills with smoke.

I shit myself, pull over and pot the bonnet

So I know what blow by is and what causes it, but Ive never seen it this bad before!

It was literally high pressure oil coming from the breathers on the rocker cover.

Started it up, drove back home.

Pritty much no oil left in the sump.

Mods include:

aftermarket intercooler, full exh, hks 2535 on 10psi.

Stock ecu

Now, Is it possible that a lean-out might of happened the last time I drove it, enough to do damage but not enough to show it at the time?

Head gasket?

Other issues?

Havent looked at the car yet, was kind of annoyed it didnt really want to touch it for the time being, just trying to determine the problem before I rip the motor out.

Cheers,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277983-huge-blow-by/
Share on other sites

agreed with the plumbing

i bet you removed all the charcoal canister and polution gear when you did the conversion, and havnt plumbed something up, if it was only under light load you may not have damaged anything yet. get the pressure cleaner out and take before and after shots so we can see where the oil came from and the so we can see how everything is plumbed under there, you will probly have an intercooler half full of oil aswell

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277983-huge-blow-by/#findComment-4699435
Share on other sites

Hang on...

How did the oil "get everywhere" if all the hoses were on?

If it were all plumbed up, all blow by would be sucked back into the motor and burnt up...

If it had a catch can, the catch can would be full/over flowing in to the intake...

If you left off the cross over pipe, it'd spew oil all over the engine bay, and thus, you just need to connect it up!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277983-huge-blow-by/#findComment-4699455
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...