Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thew r32's are a very sexy car and go jsut as hard as an r33.

they are also much more exclusive as we can only get one year of their prodiction from the 6 month 92 till 93. they tend to be in better nick . thery are oh so sexy compared to the r33.

who could not love this

meggala

mycar1.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2782-why-do-r32-gts-ts/#findComment-51847
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Issue is GTST's not GTR's. I think everyone agrees all GTR's kick ass! :rolleyes:

Humm 160kw or 187kw........187 for me thanks.

yet they are still slower.

R33 GTST - Overweight, underpowered, low body rigidity & RB25 that breaks easier.

RB20's are strong, almost as powerful evidence is the JMS car, that thing took a pounding, put out very decent power figures and was internally stock and still going strong.

btw - have seen R33 Gtst nearly beaten (was extremely close) by NA Supra. Both cars were standard, with similar driving skills.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2782-why-do-r32-gts-ts/#findComment-59874
Share on other sites

Originally posted by NIZ30

Issue is GTST's not GTR's. I think everyone agrees all GTR's kick ass! :)

 

yet they are still slower.

R33 GTST - Overweight, underpowered, low body rigidity & RB25 that breaks easier.

RB20's are strong, almost as powerful evidence is the JMS car, that thing took a pounding, put out very decent power figures and was internally stock and still going strong.

btw - have seen R33 Gtst nearly beaten (was extremely close) by NA Supra. Both cars were standard, with similar driving skills.

I didn't want to go this far to prove that you are wrong but anyway. Visit this link http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~arvidson/specs.htm check the specs, the figures speak for themselves. The R33 Gtst is faster on paper then the R32 Gtst. It's a known fact. And as for the comment about the RB25 breaking easier, well are you a mechanic? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2782-why-do-r32-gts-ts/#findComment-59942
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. You need 2x taps for anything that you cannot pass the tap all the way through. And even then, there's a point in response to the above which I will come back to. The 2x taps are 1x tapered for starting, and 1x plug tap for working to the bottom of blind holes. That block's port is effectively a blind hole from the perspective of the tap. The tapered tap/tapered thread response. You don't ever leave a female hole tapered. They are supposed to be parallel, hence the wide section of a tapered tap being parallel, the existince of plug taps, etc. The male is tapered so that it will eventually get too fat for the female thread, and yes, there is some risk if the tapped length of the female hole doesn't offer enough threads, that it will not lock up very nicely. But you can always buzz off the extra length on the male thread, and the tape is very good at adding bulk to the joint.
    • Nice....looking forward to that update
    • Neg, the top one is actually for the front. The sizes are 18x10.5 +18 and 18x11 +32.   I measured many times but I'm sure I'll have problems as this is the thread for problems.
    • Just one thing; tapping tapered threads is tricky. Taps are always tapered and you would generally run it as far as you can, but with a tapered thread you have to stop much sooner otherwise the wide part of the taper will run in too far and you will have to thread the sensor in too far too as well (possible that it will never make a good seal) BTW nice wide wheels, I guess the top one is for the back!
    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity. Edit: 11kg each (or 10.9/11.1 depending on what my scale decides over multiple tests, the 18x11 don't seem to weigh noticeably any more than 10.5)  
×
×
  • Create New...