Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I don't clicked the s2000!

My front bumper doesn't have nothing...

greeces13.jpg

the s2k had already started to swerve to try to avoid you. At 5mins in that video you will see this image and the sound of you touching the s2k

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well that would explain why the car was wobbling the rear end all over the place, Thats the reason why ANDRA specify a cross ply front trye must be used if on slicks going faster than i think 12 secs or is it 12.5?

Yes I am thinking the same thing.

Greece, if you have a Nismo 2 way diff then the accident could have been avoided with better brake control. I speculate that you left it too late to back off the throttle, panicked and then slamped on the brake when the rear end lost control. This just sent all of the weight to the front of an aldready heavy front ended set up and spun the car out of control. You should stiffen up the front suspension rather than put the stock front suspension back in.

Ok guys that is what I want.. to help me to optimise the car.. not to tell me that I am killer!!

zebra can you explain me better what are front cross ply tyres? I search it a little and I read that it is very important to run theese tires with slicks.. but I don't have slicks... I have Mickey Thompson ET Streets... They are like slicks.. they haven't metalic fibres for sidewall..

[WLDCRD]

If the S2000 continue the race she didn't have any problem.. I didn't touch her!

My front bumper hasn't any scratches! So how I touch her?

S2000 driver is a girl!!!! And we are in the same drag team :| :|

9krpm

Yes you are right!

If I leave it earlier it would be ok..

But I looose the car control because of the bumps of the street.

So you think that it is ok to have front stiff coilovers...

I also don't have front anti sway bar!! As I read at usa drag forums in every rwd they put off the antisway bar! Is it ok?

7.5 psi is very low?

The previous run was again with 7.5psi and was ok.. at the previous run I did the 11.2!

Maybe the tire pressure was less because I didn't check the tyre pressure before the run and it was night.. 7.5 was after hours that was the sun up! I protected both tires from the sun with boxes to don't have different pressures in the tires!

if some people read some things before posting they may be a little better informed

Mickey Thompson ET Street Radial Drag Tires yes Radial

http://www.jegs.com/p/Mickey-Thompson/Mick...753925/10002/-1

when i first watched the vids i though they were slicks without front runners and thought that was recipe for trouble but then read in the greeces13 sig and read he runs MT et's

i think parts of the Gibb River road in WA were flatter than that track

but at the end of the day thats racing you take it to the track where there is the support there is something go's wrong in this case it did

Edited by Walk510

ok then im quite sure you should be running front runners

as a friend ran these on his 32 with ran the front and said it scary at speed with those tyres

the radials are quite common on big hp street cars

[WLDCRD]

If the S2000 continue the race she didn't have any problem.. I didn't touch her!

My front bumper hasn't any scratches! So how I touch her?

S2000 driver is a girl!!!! And we are in the same drag team :| :|

are you saying that if she went straight ahead then she would have been fine and only you would have crashed?

i agree with whats been mentioned before there is a noise at around 5 minutes and you can also see the side skirt on the honda move when theres contact. yea maybe only minor contact, but when both your cars are allready off balance you dont ned much.

you car fish tales at least 4 times before you back off and hit the brakes. why is this?

Is it just me or does the track look like a lumpy Piece of crap ? From the first video it really looks like the track is some skanky Alleyway with all the lumps and bumps in it. Certainly not safe enough for a 10 sec car

zebra

As I understand my tires aren't radials... they are et street model... not et street radials!

And as I read is bias ply! Like cross ply..!

So i need front runners? But why? I see also

.. but I cannot understand why I cannot run with front radials..

The videο looks like with my video haha!

dangerman4

I don't know what exatly is this sound.. but you can definatly see that she turn it left before I came closer.

9krpm

I said that I don't have front sway bar!

I have only the rear sway bar.. the stock!

GTR-32U

Yeah!! It was like a motocross strip :):banana:

And in theese crazy scare strip try to run also some top fuel cars and motos.. see them following haha.

Some of them don't run after his first run!

48349636225351441008953.th.jpg48349597215351441008953.th.jpgmessini3rdrace20091114.th.jpgpolykastro2ndrace200920.th.jpg

Also read hear about my tires http://mickeythompsontires.com/strip.php?item=ETStreet

Theese tires needs tubes.. but the seller told me tha tubes needs very heavy vehicles and my vehicle don't need tubes!

Greeces13 - If I were you Id start to do a little more research before racing again, have a look for some US drag racing websites.

I thought you figured out why you cant run radials on the front and cross plys on the rear...due to the fact that you lost control of the car.....radials have WAY more cornering grip that cross plys, So instead of having even grip at the front an rear of the car, you have massive front end grip and next to zero at the back...this is half the reason you spun.

As for tubes in the tyres if they are reccomended by M/T then why the hell did the guy that sold them to you tell you, you dont need them???

Is it just me or is everybody else getting the feeling that there are ZERO saftey regs over there?

You know bumps and bounces don't mix too well with a drag setup car... that is soft suspension and low pressure tyres. pointless comparing them to a rally car that is designed for it.

end of the day what was the recommended tire pressure for them tires? not 7.5psi. That's where the major mistake was had. Anyone else try to keep control of there car at high speed with practically flat tires... i hope not. There is a difference between lowering pressure to allow some sidewall flex and ensuring a flat footprint and deflating them so they don't work at all.

The second major mistake and the potentially lethal mistake for you both is directly your fault. You almost killed someone as well as yourself never mind the damage to their car. When you started to wobble all over you should have backed off immediately.

The track did look craphouse i agree but what you did could have netted the same result on any strip.

At least you did it on a strip and not the street which is why your posting to us, not like plenty of others who can't who are frontpage news.

you car fish tales at least 4 times before you back off and hit the brakes. why is this?

I can tell you why. it's called a tank slapper and is caused by a number of things, the biggest of which is poor car control. basically over reacting and slow reacting. instead of making a small correction to both the throttle and the steering wheel you can see he jumps off the throttle which unsettles the car and then (too late) has a big tug of the wheel. hence the tank slapper which builds in momentum until he's into the wall.

I bet the S2000 driver wishes she was a few 1/10ths fast then she would have been out of his path of destruction... shame your accident also wrecked someone elses car whether you tagged it or not.

the reason you don't run radial tyres with ply tyres is not really to do with different levels of grip. it's because of the different construction of the tyres. bias ply or cross ply tyres have very soft sidewalls and very little lateral grip. running them with radial tyres on the front can cause problems with getting the car to run straight.

I would suggest going back to the ET street RADIALS. for some practice, then perhaps down the track go back to a bias ply or cross ply drag slick with the appropriate front runners to match. with more practice and some more experience your car control will improve and hopefully nothing like this will happen again.

I can tell you why. it's called a tank slapper and is caused by a number of things, the biggest of which is poor car control. basically over reacting and slow reacting. instead of making a small correction to both the throttle and the steering wheel you can see he jumps off the throttle which unsettles the car and then (too late) has a big tug of the wheel. hence the tank slapper which builds in momentum until he's into the wall.

I bet the S2000 driver wishes she was a few 1/10ths fast then she would have been out of his path of destruction... shame your accident also wrecked someone elses car whether you tagged it or not.

the reason you don't run radial tyres with ply tyres is not really to do with different levels of grip. it's because of the different construction of the tyres. bias ply or cross ply tyres have very soft sidewalls and very little lateral grip. running them with radial tyres on the front can cause problems with getting the car to run straight.

I would suggest going back to the ET street RADIALS. for some practice, then perhaps down the track go back to a bias ply or cross ply drag slick with the appropriate front runners to match. with more practice and some more experience your car control will improve and hopefully nothing like this will happen again.

ive had a few tank slappers on my bikes doin between 100-200km/h & it is frightening!

same as a skateboard when gets in a death wobbler...when this happens u hang on & hope for it to end.

I didn't touch her!

My front bumper hasn't any scratches! So how I touch her?

S2000 driver is a girl!!!! And we are in the same drag team :| :|

ella rrre - is your friend a good sort :D

zebra

As I understand my tires aren't radials... they are et street model... not et street radials!

And as I read is bias ply! Like cross ply..!

So i need front runners? But why? I see also

.. but I cannot understand why I cannot run with front radials..

The videο looks like with my video haha!

9krpm

I said that I don't have front sway bar!

I have only the rear sway bar.. the stock!

That video cracked me up but what you replied about the sway bar gives me the impression that you should certainly need to research more into car handling.

You don't wack a heavier engine into the front, remove the front sway bar and expect the car to be stable.

I read what you posted buddy. Without a sway bar at the front your car is even worst than having a stock or soft sway bar! I think you need to read a bit more into suspension tuning.

I wont' even ask what wheel alignment you had on the car.

Ok guys thanks for your good words for me.

Do you believe that I wanted to do it?

It was semifinal race of the championship at "Street RWD-4WD".

You will stop from the 1/8?

I continue the race as everyone would continue.

I was ok and I had the control of the car since I push the brakes. At the last cone was the end of the race... I hit the brakes 60 foots before the end because I was feel uncomfortable with my car.

But with the brakes the car starts to make drift.

In a good strip there is glue in all 1/4 mile.

In a good strip there is really good glue at the first foots so if I was in a good strip I didn't run with 7.5psi at my tires.

In a good strip there aren't bumps!!! If there aren'ts bumps my car wouldn't do like a ballerine!!

I understand that the strip is shit at my first run... and this run was the 6th!

That was my fault.... that I continue to do the "stunt man".

S2000 run 26x11.5x16 I run 26x11.5x15 .... Ofcourse S2000 is more stable!

S2000 had coilovers front and rear.

I had coilovers front and stock rear... maybe this was wrong too... maybe I must run with stocks front and rear!

so winning the race is more important than your life/ the other racers life and both of your cars?????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...