Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all,

had a set of high flowed sr20 injectors (flowed to 600cc) fitted to my car a few weeks back. since then i've noticed black carbon on my rear bar and chewing the fuel. i haven't been doing alot of boosting but am still getting just under 15l/100. to me this is too much so thinking its maybe to O2 sensor (was replaced about 1 year ago). got in contact with my tuner who is adamant that its the high flow injectors are causing the problem (bad spray pattern due to being drilled) not the tune. i got a power fc and high flow turbo.

hey all,

had a set of high flowed sr20 injectors (flowed to 600cc) fitted to my car a few weeks back. since then i've noticed black carbon on my rear bar and chewing the fuel. i haven't been doing alot of boosting but am still getting just under 15l/100. to me this is too much so thinking its maybe to O2 sensor (was replaced about 1 year ago). got in contact with my tuner who is adamant that its the high flow injectors are causing the problem (bad spray pattern due to being drilled) not the tune. i got a power fc and high flow turbo.

we have no dramas using high flow injectors providing they are done properly. Get an independent dyno check.

I'm a bit curious on this. Lately i swear my car is using more and more fuel. $30 of BP Ultimate gets me about 100-150km's driving to and from work, im pretty sure it used to get me around a lot more.

I was thinking maybe the oxygen sensor is f**ked from using antilag every now and then, however i'm not sure whether Microtech's and other non Power FC ECU's use the standard oxygen sensor.....?

Edited by PM-R33

My moneys on the injectors. Getting them to flow a certain rate is easy.... getting them to atomise like std ones once modded is the problem. You can get a certain afr your aiming for, but theres alot more fuel going in than required , as the unatomised stuff goes straight out the pipes.

Case in point, bout 5 years ago i wired and dyno'd an SR20 for a mate, against my advice he got the stocker's flowed to 550cc ... and said the guy promised they atomized perfectly...... Anyway i maxxed them out, 100% ..... ok, car still ran fine, except once small transition area off boost, i could not get rid of a small hiccup, no matter what i tried.... anyway left it there.

Month later i did another SR20 but this time guy used some factory 550cc injectors, made the same power, same fuel pressure (i always fit a gauge). ....... however............ only using 70% duty cycle. I was expecting a difference but not that much ! It opened my eyes quite abit.

Gary

Gary do you know much about the Microtechs and O2 sensors? I know the older models couldnt run them in closed loop, but i read somewhere the LT12S does. I hooked the laptop up and had a flick around to check if it was running in closed loop but i cant seem to find a setting anywhere. I'm pretty sure my O2 would be rooted (i've never replaced it since owning the car) however i dont know whether to replace it or not considering the Microtech might not even use it. You know anything about this? I might go ask Pete when i get a chance.

My moneys on the injectors. Getting them to flow a certain rate is easy.... getting them to atomise like std ones once modded is the problem. You can get a certain afr your aiming for, but theres alot more fuel going in than required , as the unatomised stuff goes straight out the pipes.

I've seen that on an N/A engine, especially with individual lambda sensors in the primary pipes, but never on a turbo engine, with a single sensor after the turbine . My theory has been that the hot exhaust turbine spins up the unatomised fuel, so it becomes atomised and hence shows up as richness on the F&W lambda sensor. Maybe I've just been lucky.

Pretty soon we will all be running on E85 and then it won't matter what the injector spray pattern is like, ethanol has such superior atomisation.

Cheers

Gary

PM_R33 my LT10S has the O2 sensor physically disconnected, and yeah I get about the same fuel economy as what you're getting :) effing shite ECU's they are, can't wait to get rid of it.

back on topic, is there any advantage to say getting standard RB25 injectors high flowed, or would it be better to get say S15 ones?

I don't mind the Microtech at all. Maybe mine is still tuned a lot richer than what a lot of you guys run, i dunno. I'm going to find out if it uses the 02 sensor, could have something to do with it. That fuel has to be going somewhere...

I would be looking toward the tune in the ECU, remembering microtech's have poor timing control for light throttle cruising, there injector control is also poor.

The injector spray does play a part in this also, and I will honestly say this

WHO THE f**k HIGH FLOWS INJECTORS.

Do not use them and do not sell them.

My 2c

Well let's just all jump on the "Payout Phil's ECU Train" lol. Yeah i know they aren't the best ECU. But when i put my foot down my boost gauge needle fly's really fast and car's in the mirror get really small...... I still smile :iluvff:

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...